The ascomycete fungus Trichoderma reesei is the predominant source of enzymes for industrial conversion of lignocellulose. Its glycoside hydrolase family 7 cellobiohydrolase (GH7 CBH) TreCel7A constitutes nearly half of the enzyme cocktail by weight and is the major workhorse in the cellulose hydrolysis process. The orthologs from Trichoderma atroviride (TatCel7A) and Trichoderma harzianum (ThaCel7A) show high sequence identity with TreCel7A, ~ 80%, and represent naturally evolved combinations of cellulose-binding tunnel-enclosing loop motifs, which have been suggested to influence intrinsic cellobiohydrolase properties, such as endo-initiation, processivity, and off-rate. The TatCel7A, ThaCel7A, and TreCel7A enzymes were characterized for comparison of function. The catalytic domain of TatCel7A was crystallized, and two structures were determined: without ligand and with thio-cellotriose in the active site. Initial hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose was faster with TatCel7A than either ThaCel7A or TreCel7A. In synergistic saccharification of pretreated corn stover, both TatCel7A and ThaCel7A were more efficient than TreCel7A, although TatCel7A was more sensitive to thermal inactivation. Structural analyses and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to elucidate important structure/function correlations. Moreover, reverse conservation analysis (RCA) of sequence diversity revealed divergent regions of interest located outside the cellulose-binding tunnel of Trichoderma spp. GH7 CBHs. We hypothesize that the combination of loop motifs is the main determinant for the observed differences in Cel7A activity on cellulosic substrates. Fine-tuning of the loop flexibility appears to be an important evolutionary target in Trichoderma spp., a conclusion supported by the RCA data. Our results indicate that, for industrial use, it would be beneficial to combine loop motifs from TatCel7A with the thermostability features of TreCel7A. Furthermore, one region implicated in thermal unfolding is suggested as a primary target for protein engineering.

The cellobiohydrolase (CBH) Cel6A is an important component of enzyme cocktails for industrial degradation of lignocellulosic biomass. However, the kinetics of this enzyme acting on its natural, insoluble substrate remains sparsely investigated. Here, we studied Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei with respect to adsorption, processivity, and kinetics both in the steady‐state and pre‐steady‐state regimes, on microcrystalline and amorphous cellulose. We found that slow dissociation (k_off) was limiting the overall reaction rate, and we suggest that this leads to an accumulation of catalytically inactive complexes in front of obstacles and irregularities on the cellulose surface. The processivity number of Cel6A was low on both investigated substrates (5–10), and this suggested a rugged surface with short obstacle‐free path lengths. The turnover of the inner catalytic cycle (the reactions of catalysis in one processive step) was too fast to be fully resolved, but a minimum value of about 20 s⁻¹ could be established. This is among the highest values reported hitherto for a cellulase, and it underscores the catalytic efficiency of Cel6A. Conversely, we found that Cel6A had a poor ability to recognize attack sites on the cellulose surface. On amorphous cellulose, for example, Cel6A was only able to initiate hydrolysis on about 4% of the sites to which it could adsorb. This probably reflects high requirements of Cel6A to the architecture of the site. We conclude that compared to the other CBH, Cel7A, secreted by T. reesei, Cel6A is catalytically more efficient but less capable of attacking a broad range of structurally distinct sites on the cellulose surface.Enzymes: TrCel6A, nonreducing end‐acting cellobiohydrolase (EC3.2.1.91) from Trichoderma reesei; TrCel7A, reducing end‐acting cellobiohydrolase (EC3.2.1.176) from T. reesei.

Cellobiohydrolases effectively degrade cellulose and are of biotechnological interest because they can convert lignocellulosic biomass to fermentable sugars. Here, we implemented a fluorescence-based method for real-time measurements of complexation and decomplexation of the processive cellulase Cel7A and its insoluble substrate, cellulose. The method enabled detailed kinetic and thermodynamic analyses of ligand binding in a heterogeneous system. We studied WT Cel7A and several variants in which one or two of four highly conserved Trp residues in the binding tunnel had been replaced with Ala. WT Cel7A had on/off-rate constants of 1 × 10⁵m⁻¹ s⁻¹ and 5 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹, respectively, reflecting the slow dynamics of a solid, polymeric ligand. Especially the off-rate constant was many orders of magnitude lower than typical values for small, soluble ligands. Binding rate and strength both were typically lower for the Trp variants, but effects of the substitutions were moderate and sometimes negligible. Hence, we propose that lowering the activation barrier for complexation is not a major driving force for the high conservation of the Trp residues. Using so-called Φ-factor analysis, we analyzed the kinetic and thermodynamic results for the variants. The results of this analysis suggested a transition state for complexation and decomplexation in which the reducing end of the ligand is close to the tunnel entrance (near Trp-40), whereas the rest of the binding tunnel is empty. We propose that this structure defines the highest free-energy barrier of the overall catalytic cycle and hence governs the turnover rate of this industrially important enzyme.

Cellulose degrading fungi such as Hypocrea jecorina secrete several cellulases including the two cellobiohydrolases (CBHs) Cel6A and Cel7A. The two CBHs differ in catalytic mechanism, attack different ends, belong to different families, but are both processive multi-domain enzymes that are essential in the hydrolysis of cellulose. Here we present a direct kinetic comparison of these two enzymes acting on insoluble cellulose. We used both continuous- and end-point assays under either enzyme- or substrate excess, and found distinct kinetic differences between the two CBHs. Cel6A was catalytically superior with a maximal rate over four times higher than Cel7A. Conversely, the ability of Cel6A to attack diverse structures on the cellulose surface was inferior to Cel7A. This latter difference was pronounced as the density of attack sites for Cel7A was almost an order of magnitude higher compared to Cel6A. We conclude that Cel6A is a fast but selective enzyme and that Cel7A is slower, but promiscuous. One consequence of this is that Cel6A is more effective when substrate is plentiful, while Cel7A excels when substrate is limiting. These diverse kinetic properties of Cel6A and Cel7A might elucidate why both cellobiohydrolases are prominent in cellulolytic degrading fungi.

Various cellulases consist of a catalytic domain connected to a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) by a flexible linker peptide. The linker if often strongly O-glycosylated and typically has a length of 20–50 amino acid residues. Functional roles, other than connecting the two folded domains, of the linker and its glycans, have been widely discussed, but experimental evidence remains sparse. One of the most studied cellulose degrading enzymes is the multi-domain cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Hypocrea jecorina. Here, we designed variants of Cel7A with mutations in the linker region to elucidate the role of the linker. We found that moderate modification of the linker could result in significant changes in substrate affinity and catalytic efficacy. These changes were quite different for different linker variants. Thus, deletion of six residues near the catalytic domain had essentially no effects on enzyme function. Conversely, a substitution of four glycosylation sites near the middle of the linker reduced substrate affinity and increased maximal turnover. The observation of weaker binding provides some support of recent suggestions that linker glycans may be directly involved in substrate interactions. However, a variant with several inserted glycosylation sites near the CBM also showed lower affinity for the substrate compared to the wild-type, and we suggest that substrate interactions of the glycans depend on their exact location as well as other factors such as changes in structure and dynamics of the linker peptide.