Matthew A. Lazzara

Dr. Matthew A. Lazzara

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 December 2012 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDavid Bromwich
David Bromwich
JNJulien P. Nicolas
Julien P. Nicolas
AMAndrew J. Monaghan
Andrew J. Monaghan
MLMatthew A. Lazzara
Matthew A. Lazzara
LKLinda M. Keller
Linda M. Keller
AWAaron B. Wilson
Aaron B. Wilson

31 August 2021 in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XLXichen Li
Xichen Li
WCWenju Cai
Wenju Cai
GMGerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl
DCDake Chen
Dake Chen
XYXiaojun Yuan
Xiaojun Yuan
CSChentao Song
Chentao Song

1 October 2012 in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMatthew A. Lazzara
Matthew A. Lazzara
GWGeorge A. Weidner
George A. Weidner
LKLinda M. Keller
Linda M. Keller
JTJonathan E. Thom
Jonathan E. Thom
JCJohn J. Cassano
John J. Cassano
Antarctica boasts one of the world's harshest environments. Since the earliest expeditions, a major challenge has been to characterize the surface meteorology around the continent. In 1980, the University of Wisconsin—Madison (UW-Madison) took over the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) Automatic Weather Station (AWS) program. Since then, the UW-Madison AWS network has aided in the understanding of unique Antarctic weather and climate. This paper summarizes the development of the UW-Madison AWS network, issues related to instrumentation and data quality, and some of the ways these observations have and continue to benefit scientific investigations and operational meteorology.

12 January 2012 in Reviews of Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDavid Bromwich
David Bromwich
JNJulien P. Nicolas
Julien P. Nicolas
KHKeith M. Hines
Keith M. Hines
JKJennifer E. Kay
Jennifer E. Kay
EKErica L. Key
Erica L. Key
NLNicole P. M. van Lipzig
Nicole P. M. van Lipzig

4 December 2023 in npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGIrina V. Gorodetskaya
Irina V. Gorodetskaya
CDClaudio Durán-Alarcón
Claudio Durán-Alarcón
SGSergi Gonzalez
Sergi Gonzalez
KCKyle R. Clem
Kyle R. Clem
XZXun Zou
Xun Zou
GPGhislain Picard
Ghislain Picard
The Antarctic Peninsula (AP) experienced a new extreme warm event and record-high surface melt in February 2022, rivaling the recent temperature records from 2015 and 2020, and contributing to the alarming series of extreme warm events over this region showing stronger warming compared to the rest of Antarctica. Here, the drivers and impacts of the event are analyzed in detail using a range of observational and modeling data. The northern/northwestern AP was directly impacted by an intense atmospheric river (AR) attaining category 3 on the AR scale, which brought anomalous heat and rainfall, while the AR-enhanced foehn effect further warmed its northeastern side. The event was triggered by multiple large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns linking the AR formation to tropical convection anomalies and stationary Rossby waves, with an anomalous Amundsen Sea Low and a record-breaking high-pressure system east of the AP. This multivariate and spatial compound event culminated in widespread and intense surface melt across the AP. Circulation analog analysis shows that global warming played a role in the amplification and increased probability of the event. Increasing frequency of such events can undermine the stability of the AP ice shelves, with multiple local to global impacts, including acceleration of the AP ice mass loss and changes in sensitive ecosystems.

19 May 2016 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RJR. W. Jones
R. W. Jones
IRI. A. Renfrew
I. A. Renfrew
AOA. Orr
A. Orr
BWB. G. M. Webber
B. G. M. Webber
DHD. M. Holland
D. M. Holland
MLMatthew A. Lazzara
Matthew A. Lazzara
The glaciers within the Amundsen Sea Embayment (ASE), West Antarctica, are amongst the most rapidly retreating in Antarctica. Meteorological reanalysis products are widely used to help understand and simulate the processes causing this retreat. Here we provide an evaluation against observations of four of the latest global reanalysis products within the ASE region—the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Interim Reanalysis (ERA‐I), Japanese 55‐year Reanalysis (JRA‐55), Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), and Modern Era Retrospective‐Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA). The observations comprise data from four automatic weather stations (AWSs), three research vessel cruises, and a new set of 38 radiosondes all within the period 2009–2014. All four reanalyses produce 2 m temperature fields that are colder than AWS observations, with the biases varying from approximately −1.8°C (ERA‐I) to −6.8°C (MERRA). Over the Amundsen Sea, spatially averaged summertime biases are between −0.4°C (JRA‐55) and −2.1°C (MERRA) with notably larger cold biases close to the continent (up to −6°C) in all reanalyses. All four reanalyses underestimate near‐surface wind speed at high wind speeds (>15 m s−1) and exhibit dry biases and relatively large root‐mean‐square errors (RMSE) in specific humidity. A comparison to the radiosonde soundings shows that the cold, dry bias at the surface extends into the lower troposphere; here ERA‐I and CFSR reanalyses provide the most accurate profiles. The reanalyses generally contain larger temperature and humidity biases, (and RMSE) when a temperature inversion is observed, and contain larger wind speed biases (~2 to 3 m s−1), when a low‐level jet is observed.