Due to its unique properties, zirconia is increasingly being used in dentistry, but surface preparation for bonding is difficult because of its polycrystalline structure. This study aimed to determine the effect of a new etching technique (Zircos-E) on Ceramill Zi (Amann Girrbach). The effect of etching and the use of primers (Monobond Plus and MKZ Primer) on the bond strength of zirconia with resin cement (NX3) was assessed. Shear bond strength was evaluated after storage in water for 24 h and after thermal aging (5000 thermocycling at 5 °C/55 °C). A scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4700) was used to evaluate the surface structure before and after the Zircos-E system. The roughness parameters were assessed using an SJ-410 profilometer. The etched zirconia surface is more homogeneous over the entire surface, but some localized forms of erosion exist. The etching of zirconia ceramics caused changes in the surface structure of zirconia and a significant increase in the shear bond strength between zirconia and resin cement. The use of primers positively affects the adhesion between resin cement and zirconia. Aging with thermocycler significantly reduced the shear bond strength, with one exception—sandblasted samples with MKZ Primer. Standard ceramic surface preparation, involving only alumina sandblasting, does not provide a satisfactory bond. The use of etching with the Zircos-E system and primers had a positive effect on the strength of the zirconium–resin cement connection.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of prosthetic substrate type, resin cement shade, and opaquer liner application on the translucency and color matching of translucent zirconia- and lithium-based ceramics. Four A2-shade zirconia materials (Katana HTML Plus, STML, UTML, and YML), with and without an opaquer liner, lithium disilicate ceramics (Amber Mill LT and HT), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Celtra Duo) were investigated. Monolithic crowns and standardized rectangular specimens were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and cemented with neutral, warm-shade, and opaque try-in pastes onto A2-shade composite resin and cobalt–chromium substrates. Color measurements were performed using a digital colorimeter based on the CIE L*a*b* system. Translucency parameters (TPs) and color differences (ΔE) relative to the A2 reference shade were calculated. Lithium-based ceramics exhibited significantly higher translucency than zirconia materials. Application of the opaquer liner on intaglio surface of crowns reduced their translucency. On A2-shade substrates, translucent zirconia luted with neutral or warm-shade paste demonstrated the most favorable color compatibility. In contrast, opaque try-in paste resulted in clinically unacceptable color deviations and loss of optical depth. On metallic substrates, most materials exhibited pronounced gray discoloration and substantial color mismatch, particularly lithium disilicate ceramics. These findings indicate that ceramic type, substrate color, opaquer liner application, and resin cement shade significantly influence the optical performance and final color outcome of all-ceramic restorations.