ROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO

Dr. ROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 August 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RTROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
ROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
SGSantiago Grau
Santiago Grau
JBJordi Blanch
Jordi Blanch
MRMarta Riu
Marta Riu
PSPere Saballs
Pere Saballs
HKHernando Knobel
Hernando Knobel
There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in patients with bacteremia. We performed a retrospective study of patients with a first episode of community-acquired or healthcare-related bacteremia during hospital admission between 2004 and 2009. A total of 2,311 patients were included. Cox regression was used to analyze the behaviour of eosinophil count and the NLCR in survivors and non-survivors. In the adjusted analysis, the main independent risk factor for mortality was persistence of an eosinophil count below 0.0454·103/uL (HR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.66–6.62). An NLCR value >7 was also an independent risk factor but was of lesser importance. The mean eosinophil count in survivors showed a tendency to increase rapidly and to achieve normal values between the second and third day. In these patients, the NLCR was 7 were independent markers of mortality in patients with bacteremia.

31 January 2008 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FÁFrancisco Álvarez-Lerma
Francisco Álvarez-Lerma
EMElena Maull
Elena Maull
RTROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
ROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
CSConcepción Segura
Concepción Segura
IPIrene Planells
Irene Planells
AVAntonia Vázquez
Antonia Vázquez
Background: An outbreak of severe nosocomial Burkholderia cepacia infections in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), including investigation of the reservoir, is described. Methods: Over a period of 18 days, isolates of Burkholderia cepacia were recovered from different biological samples from five patients who were admitted to a multidisciplinary 18-bed intensive care unit. Isolation of B. cepacia was associated with bacteraemia in three cases, lower respiratory tract infection in one and urinary tract infection in one. Contact isolation measures were instituted; new samples from the index patients and adjacent patients were collected; and samples of antiseptics, eau de Cologne and moisturizing body milk available in treatment carts at that time were collected and cultured. Results: B. cepacia was isolated from three samples of the moisturizing body milk that had been applied to the patients. Three new hermetically closed units, from three different batches, were sent for culture; two of these were positive as well. All strains recovered from environmental and biological samples were identified as belonging to the same clone by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The cream was withdrawn from all hospitalization units and no new cases of B. cepacia infection developed. Conclusion: Moisturizing body milk is a potential source of infection. In severely ill patients, the presence of bacteria in cosmetic products, even within accepted limits, may lead to severe life-threatening infections.

24 December 2009 in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Maria Milagro MonteroMaria Milagro Montero
Maria Milagro Montero
MSMaria Sala
Maria Sala
MRM. Riu
M. Riu
FBF. Belvis
F. Belvis
MSM. Salvado
M. Salvado
HKHernando Knobel
Hernando Knobel

1 December 2009 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juan P. HorcajadaJuan P. Horcajada
Juan P. Horcajada
MBMarcos Busto
Marcos Busto
SGSantiago Grau
Santiago Grau
LSLuisa Sorlí
Luisa Sorlí
RTROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
ROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
HKHernando Knobel
Hernando Knobel

7 April 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMarta Riu
Marta Riu
PCPietro Chiarello
Pietro Chiarello
RTROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
ROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
MSMaria Sala
Maria Sala
EGEnric Garcia-Alzorriz
Enric Garcia-Alzorriz
FCFrancesc Cots
Francesc Cots
To calculate the incremental cost of nosocomial bacteremia caused by the most common organisms, classified by their antimicrobial susceptibility. We selected patients who developed nosocomial bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These microorganisms were analyzed because of their high prevalence and they frequently present multidrug resistance. A control group consisted of patients classified within the same all-patient refined-diagnosis related group without bacteremia. Our hospital has an established cost accounting system (full-costing) that uses activity-based criteria to analyze cost distribution. A logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the probability of developing bacteremia for each admission (propensity score) and was used for propensity score matching adjustment. Subsequently, the propensity score was included in an econometric model to adjust the incremental cost of patients who developed bacteremia, as well as differences in this cost, depending on whether the microorganism was multidrug-resistant or multidrug-sensitive. A total of 571 admissions with bacteremia matched the inclusion criteria and 82,022 were included in the control group. The mean cost was € 25,891 for admissions with bacteremia and € 6,750 for those without bacteremia. The mean incremental cost was estimated at € 15,151 (CI, € 11,570 to € 18,733). Multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa bacteremia had the highest mean incremental cost, € 44,709 (CI, € 34,559 to € 54,859). Antimicrobial-susceptible E. coli nosocomial bacteremia had the lowest mean incremental cost, € 10,481 (CI, € 8,752 to € 12,210). Despite their lower cost, episodes of antimicrobial-susceptible E. coli nosocomial bacteremia had a major impact due to their high frequency. Adjustment of hospital cost according to the organism causing bacteremia and antibiotic sensitivity could improve prevention strategies and allow their prioritization according to their overall impact and costs. Infection reduction is a strategy to reduce resistance.

15 August 2010 in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCD. Conde-Estévez
D. Conde-Estévez
SGS. Grau
S. Grau
JAJ. Albanell
J. Albanell
RTROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
ROSER TERRADAS-ROBLEDO
MSM. Salvadó
M. Salvadó
HKHernando Knobel
Hernando Knobel