Hannah Goldswain

Dr. Hannah Goldswain

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2020 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLynnette C. Goatley
Lynnette C. Goatley
ARAna Reis
Ana Reis
RPRaquel Portugal
Raquel Portugal
HGHannah Goldswain
Hannah Goldswain
GSGareth L. Shimmon
Gareth L. Shimmon
CNChristopher Netherton
Christopher Netherton
Classical approaches to African swine fever virus (ASFV) vaccine development have not been successful; inactivated virus does not provide protection and use of live attenuated viruses generated by passage in tissue culture had a poor safety profile. Current African swine fever (ASF) vaccine research focuses on the development of modified live viruses by targeted gene deletion or subunit vaccines. The latter approach would be differentiation of vaccinated from infected animals (DIVA)-compliant, but information on which viral proteins to include in a subunit vaccine is lacking. Our previous work used DNA-prime/vaccinia-virus boost to screen 40 ASFV genes for immunogenicity, however this immunization regime did not protect animals after challenge. Here we describe the induction of both antigen and ASFV-specific antibody and cellular immune responses by different viral-vectored pools of antigens selected based on their immunogenicity in pigs. Immunization with one of these pools, comprising eight viral-vectored ASFV genes, protected 100% of pigs from fatal disease after challenge with a normally lethal dose of virulent ASFV. This data provide the basis for the further development of a subunit vaccine against this devastating disease.

26 November 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IDI’aH Donovan-Banfield
I’aH Donovan-Banfield
RPRebekah Penrice-Randal
Rebekah Penrice-Randal
HGHannah Goldswain
Hannah Goldswain
ARAleksandra M. Rzeszutek
Aleksandra M. Rzeszutek
JPJack Pilgrim
Jack Pilgrim
TFThomas Fletcher
Thomas Fletcher
Molnupiravir is an antiviral, currently approved by the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for treating at-risk COVID-19 patients, that induces lethal error catastrophe in SARS-CoV-2. How this drug-induced mechanism of action might impact the emergence of resistance mutations is unclear. To investigate this, we used samples from the AGILE Candidate Specific Trial (CST)−2 (clinical trial number NCT04746183). The primary outcomes of AGILE CST-2 were to measure the drug safety and antiviral efficacy of molnupiravir in humans (180 participants randomised 1:1 with placebo). Here, we describe the pre-specified exploratory virological endpoint of CST-2, which was to determine the possible genomic changes in SARS-CoV-2 induced by molnupiravir treatment. We use high-throughput amplicon sequencing and minor variant analysis to characterise viral genomics in each participant whose longitudinal samples (days 1, 3 and 5 post-randomisation) pass the viral genomic quality criteria (n = 59 for molnupiravir and n = 65 for placebo). Over the course of treatment, no specific mutations were associated with molnupiravir treatment. We find that molnupiravir significantly increased the transition:transversion mutation ratio in SARS-CoV-2, consistent with the model of lethal error catastrophe. This study highlights the utility of examining intra-host virus populations to strengthen the prediction, and surveillance, of potential treatment-emergent adaptations.

26 May 2022 in GigaScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XDXiaofeng Dong
Xiaofeng Dong
RPRebekah Penrice-Randal
Rebekah Penrice-Randal
HGHannah Goldswain
Hannah Goldswain
TPTessa Prince
Tessa Prince
NRNadine Randle
Nadine Randle
JHJulian Hiscox
Julian Hiscox
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a complex strategy for the transcription of viral subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs), which are targets for nucleic acid diagnostics. Each of these sgmRNAs has a unique 5′ sequence, the leader–transcriptional regulatory sequence gene junction (leader–TRS junction), that can be identified using sequencing. High-resolution sequencing has been used to investigate the biology of SARS-CoV-2 and the host response in cell culture and animal models and from clinical samples. LeTRS, a bioinformatics tool, was developed to identify leader–TRS junctions and can be used as a proxy to quantify sgmRNAs for understanding virus biology. LeTRS is readily adaptable for other coronaviruses such as Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus or a future newly discovered coronavirus. LeTRS was tested on published data sets and novel clinical samples from patients and longitudinal samples from animal models with coronavirus disease 2019. LeTRS identified known leader–TRS junctions and identified putative novel sgmRNAs that were common across different mammalian species. This may be indicative of an evolutionary mechanism where plasticity in transcription generates novel open reading frames, which can then subject to selection pressure. The data indicated multiphasic abundance of sgmRNAs in two different animal models. This recapitulates the relative sgmRNA abundance observed in cells at early points in infection but not at late points. This pattern is reflected in some human nasopharyngeal samples and therefore has implications for transmission models and nucleic acid–based diagnostics. LeTRS provides a quantitative measure of sgmRNA abundance from sequencing data. This can be used to assess the biology of SARS-CoV-2 (or other coronaviruses) in clinical and nonclinical samples, especially to evaluate different variants and medical countermeasures that may influence viral RNA synthesis.

18 January 2024 in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AOAnn Olesen
Ann Olesen
LLLouise Lohse
Louise Lohse
FAFrancesc Accensi
Francesc Accensi
HGHannah Goldswain
Hannah Goldswain
GBGraham Belsham
Graham Belsham
RPRaquel Portugal
Raquel Portugal
Knowledge about African swine fever virus (ASFV) transmission and its survival in the environment is mandatory to develop rational control strategies and combat this serious disease in pigs. In this study, the risk that environmental contamination poses for infection of naïve pigs was investigated. Naïve pigs were introduced as sentinels into contaminated pens kept at ambient temperature (about 18–22˚C) either on the same day or up to 3 days after ASFV‐infected pigs were removed. Three experiments were carried out in which four to six pigs per pen were inoculated with virulent ASFV isolates OURT88/1 (genotype I), Georgia 2007/1, or POL/2015/Podlaskie (genotype II), respectively. The majority of the inoculated pigs developed acute disease but with no evident haemorrhagic lesions or haemorrhagic diarrhoea and were culled at the predefined humane endpoint. The levels of ASFV DNA detected in the blood of the infected animals reached 107−9 genome copies/ml before euthanasia. Environmental swabs were taken from different surfaces in the animal rooms, as well as from faeces and urine, close to the time of introduction of the naïve animals. Relatively low quantities of virus DNA were detected in the environmental samples, in the range of 103−7 genome copies per swab or per gram and ml of faeces and urine. No infectious virus was recovered from these environmental samples. Neither clinical signs nor virus genomes were detected in the blood of any of the sentinel pigs over a period of 2 to 3 weeks after exposure, indicating that transmission from the ASFV‐contaminated environment did not occur. Interestingly, viral DNA was detected in nasal and oral swabs from some of the sentinel animals at early days of exposure (ranging between 103.7−5.8 genome copies per swab), though none of them developed ASF. The results indicate a relatively low risk of ASFV transmission from a contaminated environment under the conditions provided in these experimental studies and in the absence of bloodshed from infected animals.

24 November 2021 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
TPTessa Prince
Tessa Prince
IDI’ah Donovan-Banfield
I’ah Donovan-Banfield
HGHannah Goldswain
Hannah Goldswain
RPRebekah Penrice-Randal
Rebekah Penrice-Randal
CHCatherine Hartley
Catherine Hartley
LTLance Turtle
Lance Turtle
Several regulatory agencies have either licensed or given emergency use approval for treatment of patients at risk of developing severe COVID-19 with the anti-viral drug, Molnupiravir. Recent trials involving Molnupiravir suggested the drug was not as efficacious as earlier studies suggested. This study aimed to: (i) determine the effectiveness of the Molnupiravir active metabolite (NHC) against different SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern (VoCs), (ii) establish the therapeutic window of NHC in a human lung cell model, and (iii) and evaluate the genetic barrier to resistance. Dose response assays were performed in parallel to determine the IC50 (the concentration required to inhibit virus titre by 50%) of NHC against different variants. Human ACE-2 A549 cells were treated with NHC at different time points either before, during or after infection with SARS-CoV-2. Multiple passaging in the presence or absence of drug was used to evaluate whether resistance occurred. To obtain genomic information, virus was sequenced at regular intervals. After 20 passages in the presence of the drug, dose response assays and sequencing showed the virus did not appear to have developed resistance. The drug had equivalent activity against four VOCs ranging from 0.04 to 0.16μM IC50. The efficacy of the drug diminished when applied after 24 hours post-infection. Our results suggest that earlier administration in patients, perhaps pre- or post-exposure rather than symptom onset, would be a more effective treatment option.

18 July 2022 in Research Square
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
TFThomas Fletcher
Thomas Fletcher
IDI'Ah Donovan-Banfield
I'Ah Donovan-Banfield
RPRebekah Penrice-Randal
Rebekah Penrice-Randal
HGHannah Goldswain
Hannah Goldswain
ARAleksandra Rzeszutek
Aleksandra Rzeszutek
JHJulian Hiscox
Julian Hiscox
Molnupiravir is an antiviral approved for treating COVID-19, which is thought to drive lethal error catastrophe. How this drug-induced mechanism of action impacts the emergence of resistance mutations is unclear. AGILE Candidate Specific Trial (CST)-2 is a phase IIa trial randomising 180 adult outpatients with SARS-COV-2 infection within five days of symptom onset to molnupiravir or placebo, with rich serial sampling of nasopharyngeal swabs over 29 days. Viral sequences, that passed genome quality control criteria, from subjects who received molnupiravir (n=59) or a placebo (n=65) were analysed by high-throughput amplicon sequencing. We found evidence that molnupiravir significantly increased the transition/transversion frequency in SARS-CoV-2 in patients, a hallmark of molnupiravir treatment. Over the course of treatment, no consistent, accumulated mutations were identified in either arm.