Aziz None Sancar

Prof. Aziz None Sancar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2004 in Annual Review of Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAziz None Sancar
Aziz None Sancar
LLLaura A. Lindsey-Boltz
Laura A. Lindsey-Boltz
KÜKeziban Ünsal-Kaçmaz
Keziban Ünsal-Kaçmaz
SLStuart Linn
Stuart Linn
▪ Abstract DNA damage is a relatively common event in the life of a cell and may lead to mutation, cancer, and cellular or organismic death. Damage to DNA induces several cellular responses that enable the cell either to eliminate or cope with the damage or to activate a programmed cell death process, presumably to eliminate cells with potentially catastrophic mutations. These DNA damage response reactions include: (a) removal of DNA damage and restoration of the continuity of the DNA duplex; (b) activation of a DNA damage checkpoint, which arrests cell cycle progression so as to allow for repair and prevention of the transmission of damaged or incompletely replicated chromosomes; (c) transcriptional response, which causes changes in the transcription profile that may be beneficial to the cell; and (d) apoptosis, which eliminates heavily damaged or seriously deregulated cells. DNA repair mechanisms include direct repair, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair, and cross-link repair. The DNA damage checkpoints employ damage sensor proteins, such as ATM, ATR, the Rad17-RFC complex, and the 9-1-1 complex, to detect DNA damage and to initiate signal transduction cascades that employ Chk1 and Chk2 Ser/Thr kinases and Cdc25 phosphatases. The signal transducers activate p53 and inactivate cyclin-dependent kinases to inhibit cell cycle progression from G1 to S (the G1/S checkpoint), DNA replication (the intra-S checkpoint), or G2 to mitosis (the G2/M checkpoint). In this review the molecular mechanisms of DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints in mammalian cells are analyzed.

19 April 2003 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAziz None Sancar
Aziz None Sancar

15 March 2010 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAziz None Sancar
Aziz None Sancar
LLLaura A. Lindsey-Boltz
Laura A. Lindsey-Boltz
Tae-Hong KangTae-Hong Kang
Tae-Hong Kang
JRJoyce T. Reardon
Joyce T. Reardon
JLJin Hyup Lee
Jin Hyup Lee
NONuri Ozturk
Nuri Ozturk

1 January 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAziz None Sancar
Aziz None Sancar
RGRussell N. Van Gelder
Russell N. Van Gelder
Doubts in cancer-rhythms connections: Circadian clocks help to coordinate physiological processes with the daily cycles of light and dark and periods of feeding, activity, and rest. Being out of sync with such 24-hour cycles can have unhealthy effects. Sancar and Van Gelder review the available evidence regarding circadian disruption and predisposition to cancer and circadian variations in response to cancer chemotherapy. The literature can be difficult to interpret. For example, complete knockouts of clock genes are not the same as shift work. Overall, they find that the jury is still out on whether circadian disruption can promote cancer in general and if the timing of cancer treatment can be optimized. However, enough indications are present that further research is recommended. Science , this issue p. 42

10 February 2003 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VBVladimir P. Bermudez
Vladimir P. Bermudez
LLLaura A. Lindsey-Boltz
Laura A. Lindsey-Boltz
ACAnthony Cesare
Anthony Cesare
YMYoshimasa Maniwa
Yoshimasa Maniwa
JGJack D. Griffith
Jack D. Griffith
ASAziz None Sancar
Aziz None Sancar
The human DNA damage sensors, Rad17-replication factor C (Rad17-RFC) and the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (9-1-1) checkpoint complex, are thought to be involved in the early steps of the DNA damage checkpoint response. Rad17-RFC and the 9-1-1 complex have been shown to be structurally similar to the replication factors, RFC clamp loader and proliferating cell nuclear antigen polymerase clamp, respectively. Here, we demonstrate functional similarities between the replication and checkpoint clamp loader/DNA clamp pairs. When all eight subunits of the two checkpoint complexes are coexpressed in insect cells, a stable Rad17-RFC/9-1-1 checkpoint supercomplex forms in vivo and is readily purified. The two individually purified checkpoint complexes also form a supercomplex in vitro , which depends on ATP and is mediated by interactions between Rad17 and Rad9. Rad17-RFC binds to nicked circular, gapped, and primed DNA and recruits the 9-1-1 complex in an ATP-dependent manner. Electron microscopic analyses of the reaction products indicate that the 9-1-1 ring is clamped around the DNA.

21 November 2006 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSChristopher P. Selby
Christopher P. Selby
ASAziz None Sancar
Aziz None Sancar
Photolyases and cryptochrome blue-light photoreceptors are evolutionarily related flavoproteins that perform distinct functions. Photolyases repair UV-damaged DNA in many species from bacteria to plants and animals. Cryptochromes regulate growth and development in plants and the circadian clock in animals. Recently, a new branch of the photolyase/cryptochrome family was identified. Members of this branch exhibited no or trace levels of DNA repair activity in vivo and in vitro and, therefore, were considered to be cryptochromes, and they were named cryptochrome-DASH. Here, we show that Cry-DASH proteins from bacterial, plant, and animal sources actually are photolyases with high degree of specificity for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in ssDNA.