Shin Young Yun, M.D., John Hoon Rim, M.D., Hyein Kang, M.D., Sang-Guk Lee, M.D., and Jong-Baeck Lim, M.D.. Ann Lab Med 2023;43:237-43. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.3.237

Objectives: Free light chain (FLC) is used for the diagnosis and prediction with regard to the progression risk of plasma cell disorders and Freelite reagent using the SPAplus analyzer (The Binding Site) has been one of the widely used option. However, N Latex FLC reagent with the Atellica CH 930 analyzer (Siemens Healthineers) has shown the advantages of automation and high throughput. We aimed to evaluated clinical implication by differential analytical performances of two assays. Methods: A total of 322 serum samples were collected from 193 patients requested for FLC analysis including 131 multiple myeloma patients. The precision, linearity, dilution recovery of N Latex FLC assay was evaluated. We compared the two assays and analyzed the monomer-dimer pattern for discrepant results. Results: The precision, linearity, and dilution recovery performance was appropriate for the routine use in clinical laboratories. Despite the good correlation within normal range, proportional bias up-to 170% was observed in samples with high concentrations especially for lambda. The higher value samples with N Latex FLC assay contained more monomer forms than controls. All opposite changes of FLC burden by the N Latex FLC assay proved to present concordant dynamic changes when assessed by serum protein electrophoresis. Conclusions: Clinical laboratories should be aware of the inter-assay variability of FLC quantitative measurements using different platforms, especially for high concentrations of both kappa and lambda measurements, possibly due to monomer/dimer ratio diversity. Clinical interpretations for multiple myeloma disease status might not be dramatically affected only when the same assay is utilized during follow-up periods.

Tumor markers should be measured regularly and accurately to prevent, diagnose, and monitor cancers efficiently. We aimed to characterize the pre-analytical factors effecting on the analytical performance of point-of-care test (POCT) platform Ichroma^TM II (Boditech Med Inc., Gangwon-do, Korea) for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) and evaluate their consequences in clinical practice. Based on comprehensive evaluation for the analytical performance of Ichroma^TM II including precision, linearity, and method comparison performed according to CLSI guidelines, pre-analytical factors of sample types and conditions were extensively analyzed. A total of five sample types [serum, plasma (PL) and whole blood (WB) from EDTA tube, PL and WB from sodium heparin tube] from 40 patients were used for comparing among specimen types. Additionally, stability was assessed up to 21 h at room temperature, refrigerated for 8 days, and frozen for 16 weeks by using 4 levels of pooled patient samples which were measured in triplicate. Precision, linearity and correlation with central laboratory analyzers observed in all three tumor markers were within acceptable criteria. However, variable degrees of percent deviations were observed according to sample type and storage conditions. Only EDTA PL samples presented clinically acceptable percentage biases for all three tumor markers when stored at room temperature or refrigerated condition. Positive bias of CEA and PSA in storage duration until 16 weeks were observed when stored in frozen condition. While Ichroma^TM II showed an adequate analytical performance as a POCT platform with simple operating procedures for the measurement of tumor markers, clinical laboratories should be aware of stability issues when different types of blood specimens are practically utilized.

Background: While the real-world impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation change on clinical outcome in a longitudinal cohort setting is limited, external valuation of equation performance should be performed in different population cohorts. This study aimed to compare differential impacts of eGFR values, calculated by 5 equations in a Korean patient population, on clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study analyzed 23 246 participants with standardized creatinine/cystatin C assay-based laboratory results. The primary exposure was baseline eGFR calculated by 5 different equations including the recently developed 2021 race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. Clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality, renal replacement therapy, and albuminuria were analyzed to estimate the hazard ratio of the eGFR on clinical outcomes. Results: Among the 5 equations, CKD-EPI 2021 with creatinine and cystatin C (CKD-EPI 2021-CrCys) showed an earlier increase in hazard ratios for all clinical outcomes, while CKD-EPI 2012 with cystatin C showed a higher hazard ratio for all-cause mortality at low eGFR. Replacing CKD-EPI 2012 with CKD-EPI 2021-CrCys, 5.4% of patients with mortality and 3.3% of patients who received renal replacement therapy were reclassified to a lower risk stage. Conclusions: The 2021 CKD-EPI equations were acceptable in a Korean population, with better predictive power for clinical outcomes when compared to previous equations. The updated race-free factors for eGFR calculation improved identification of patients at risk for clinical outcomes.

Yu Jeong Choi, M.D., Hyein Kang, M.D., Chan-Ik Cho, M.S., John Hoon Rim, M.D, Ph.D., Sang-Guk Lee, M.D., Ph.D., and Jong-Baeck Lim, M.D, Ph.D.. Ann Lab Med 2023;43:167-73. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.2.167

Hanmil Jang, Yonggeun Cho, John Hoon Rim, Hyein Kang, Sang-Guk Lee, and Jong-Baeck Lim. Lab Med Qual Assur 2021;43:208-13. https://doi.org/10.15263/jlmqa.2021.43.4.208