Arterial lactate is an established risk marker in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). However, its clinical applicability is limited by the need of an arterial puncture. In contrast, venous lactate can easily be measured from blood samples obtained via routine peripheral venepuncture. We investigated the prognostic value of venous lactate with regard to in-hospital adverse outcomes and mortality in 419 consecutive PE patients enrolled in a single-center registry between 09/2008 and 09/2017. An optimised venous lactate cut-off value of 3.3 mmol/l predicted both, in-hospital adverse outcome (OR 11.0 [95% CI 4.6-26.3]) and all-cause mortality (OR 3.8 [95%CI 1.3-11.3]). The established cut-off value for arterial lactate (2.0 mmol/l) and the upper limit of normal for venous lactate (2.3 mmol/l) had lower prognostic value for adverse outcomes (OR 3.6 [95% CI 1.5-8.7] and 5.7 [95% CI 2.4-13.6], respectively) and did not predict mortality. If added to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) algorithm, venous lactate <2.3 mmol/l was associated with a high negative predictive value (0.99 [95% CI 0.97-1.00]) for adverse outcomes in intermediate-low-risk patients, whereas levels ≥3.3 mmol/l predicted adverse outcomes in the intermediate-high-risk group (OR 5.2 [95% CI 1.8-15.0]). Venous lactate above the upper limit of normal was associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes and an optimised cut-off value of 3.3 mmol/l predicted adverse outcome and mortality. Adding venous lactate to the 2019 ESC algorithm may improve risk stratification. Importantly, the established cut-off value for arterial lactate has limited specificity in venous samples and should not be used.
Background: While previous studies indicate an association between chest pain and favorable clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), the extent and underlying mechanisms of this effect remain inadequately defined. Methods: We investigated the prognostic value of chest pain with regard to in-hospital adverse outcomes and the association of chest pain with age and sex in consecutive patients with confirmed PE enrolled in a single-center registry between 2008 and 2019. Results: Of 858 patients (52% female) included in this study, 435 (51%) had chest pain at presentation. Chest pain was more prevalent in younger individuals aged 18–34 years (74%) compared to patients >34 years (46%). The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) was similar in patients with and without chest pain (17.0% vs. 16.1%). Chest pain patients less frequently presented with elevated troponin levels (p < 0.001) or signs of right heart strain (RHS; p = 0.007) but more frequently exhibited imaging signs of pulmonary infarction (p = 0.001). Chest pain was associated with lower risk of adverse outcome (OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.19–0.65]) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.31 [95% CI: 0.13–0.74]). Multivariable models confirmed a prognostic effect independent of sex, comorbidities and results of risk stratification algorithms. Conclusions: In acute PE, chest pain is a favorable prognostic marker irrespective of sex. Chest pain patients are less likely to suffer from myocardial ischemia or show signs of RHS but more frequently show imaging signs of pulmonary infarction, suggesting pleuritic irritation rather than myocardial ischemia as the likely cause of pain.