Background: Local audits of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prescriptions and outcomes are necessary to assess guideline awareness among clinicians and treatment effectiveness. Aims: The aims were to investigate first-line prescriptions and effectiveness over a 10-year period in Ireland and evaluate the influence of the 2017 Irish consensus guidelines on these trends. Methods: Data were collected at e-CRF AEG-REDCap from the European Registry on H. pylori management (Hp-EuReg) and quality reviewed from 2013 to 2022. All treatment-naïve cases were assessed for effectiveness by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Multivariate analysis was also performed. Results: Data from 1000 patients (mean age 50 ± 15 years; 54% female) were analyzed. Clarithromycin (C) and amoxicillin (A) triple therapy represented 88% of treatments, followed by sequential C, A, and metronidazole (M) therapy (4.3%) and triple C + M (2.7%). Bismuth quadruple therapy was prescribed in 1.7% of cases. Treatment durations of 14, 10, and 7 days accounted for 87%, 4.5%, and 8.5% of prescriptions, respectively. High-, standard-, and low-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 80 mg, 40 mg, and 20 mg omeprazole equivalent b.i.d.) were used in 86%, 0.9%, and 13% of cases, respectively. The overall eradication rate was 80%, while it was 81% for triple C + A. Good compliance and high-dose PPI were associated with higher overall mITT eradication rates (OR 4.5 and OR 1.9, respectively) and triple C + A eradication rates (OR 4.2 and OR 1.9, respectively). Overall eradication rates increased from 74% pre-2017 to 82% (p < 0.05) by the end of 2022. Similarly, the triple C + A eradication rates increased from 76% to 83% (p < 0.05). Conclusions: While first-line treatment effectiveness improved in clinical practice over time, cure rates remain below 90%. Alternative first-line strategies are required in Ireland.

Resistance surveillance programmes are essential for choosing the most appropriate eradication therapy for the stomach pathogen Helicobacter pylori. This study aimed to determine H. pylori antimicrobial resistance rates in Ireland. H. pylori was cultured from patients attending four gastroenterology clinics from 2018 to 2023. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using Etests for metronidazole, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, tetracycline and rifampicin and resistance classified using EUCAST guidelines. Resistance rates were compared between H. pylori treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (primary and secondary resistance, respectively). Samples from 138 culture-positive patients (mean age 49.4 ± 15.7 years, 47.1% female) were analysed. A total of 28.7% of isolates from treatment-naïve patients were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested. Primary resistance rates to metronidazole, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, tetracycline and rifampicin were 44.3%, 36.5%, 18.3%, 14.6%, 9.6% and 9.6%, respectively. Primary dual resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole was 22.6% and primary multidrug resistance was 13.0%. Secondary resistance rates were significantly higher than primary resistance rates for clarithromycin, metronidazole, dual resistance to clarithromycin and either amoxicillin, metronidazole or levofloxacin, and multidrug resistance. Female sex and older age were associated with increased risk of resistance. H. pylori resistance rates were high in our cohort. Clarithromycin-based triple therapy should no longer be used in Ireland in the absence of pre-treatment AST. Resistance to amoxicillin, tetracycline and rifampicin should be monitored closely.

Exploring the intricacies of host-pathogen communication is vital in order to understand why some microbes persist within a host, while others are effectively cleared. As such, host-pathogen communication is an urgent area of research underpinning human health and disease, especially given the emerging concerns of antibiotic resistance. Understanding host-pathogen pathways requires intricate knowledge in the fields of both microbiology and immunology. Living in a world of specialists, where scientists sometimes invest their whole career studying one organism, a specific pathway or a protein, multidisciplinary discussions of host-pathogen interactions are highly needed. This international conference will provide such a forum for scientific exchange at the highest level, between scientists from different research areas related to host-pathogen interactions, with the aim to trigger fruitful collaborations addressing the urgent questions in the field. This meeting has an additional special focus of bringing researchers from Ireland, Denmark and Israel together to learn about cutting edge biology and form new collaborations. Thus, the conference will be a showcase for the exciting and original research emanating from these three small but innovative countries.