Background: The WHO advised that the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on TB services was estimated to be dramatic due to the disruption of TB services. Methods: A retrospective data collection and evaluation was conducted to include all the patients hospitalized for TB at INMI from 9 March to 31 August 2020 (lockdown period and three months thereafter). For the purpose of the study, data from patients hospitalized in the same period of 2019 were also collected. Results: In the period of March–August 2019, 201 patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of TB, while in the same period of 2020, only 115 patients, with a case reduction of 43%. Patients with weight loss, acute respiratory failure, concurrent extrapulmonary TB, and higher Timika radiographic scores were significantly more frequently hospitalized during 2020 vs. 2019. The median patient delay was 75 days (IQR: 40–100) in 2020 compared to 30 days (IQR: 10–60) in 2019 (p < 0.01). Diagnostic delays in 2020 remain significant in the multiple logistic model (AOR = 6.93, 95%CI: 3.9–12.3). Conclusions: Our experience suggests that COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on TB patient care in terms of higher diagnostic delay, reduction in hospitalization, and a greater severity of clinical presentations.
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) can seriously affect the hematopoietic system, with involvement of both myeloid and lymphoid cell lines as well as plasma components. These hematological changes act as a marker for the diagnosis, prognosis and response to therapy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and WHO websites from 1950 to May 2021 for papers on the interaction between TB and common and rare hematological manifestation. Results: Hematological reactions in patients with TB are possible in both young and old women and men but seem more frequent in the elderly, and they can be predictors of both diagnosis and worse outcome for TB, regardless of whether it is pulmonary, extra pulmonary or miliary. Even anti-TB therapies can cause hematological adverse events, among which some are serious and rare and can compromise the patient’s recovery pathway to completing treatment. Conclusion: Hematological screening and follow-up, including complete blood count and coagulation, are always necessary both at the diagnosis of TB and during antitubercular treatment in order to monitor hematological parameters. Short therapy regimens for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) may also be useful for reducing hematological toxicity, especially in contexts where this cannot be monitored. Close monitoring of drug interactions and hematological adverse events is always recommended.
Background/Objectives: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health issue, further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study assesses the clinical outcomes of TB-COVID-19-coinfected patients compared to those with TB disease alone at an Italian infectious disease hospital during the pandemic’s first two years. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was conducted on TB patients hospitalized from March 2020 to June 2022. Data included demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Coinfection was defined as concurrent TB disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Statistical methods included Fisher’s exact test and Mann–Whitney statistics. Results: Of 267 TB patients, 25 (9.4%) had concurrent COVID-19 infection. The TB-COVID-19 group showed higher rates of diabetes and cough. Acute respiratory failure was more prevalent in coinfected patients (odds ratio, 5.99), and coinfection was associated with worse outcomes compared to TB alone (odds ratio, 0.15). Despite similar socio-demographic factors, the coexistence of TB and COVID-19 led to exacerbated respiratory failure and increased mortality. Conclusions: Coinfection with TB and COVID-19 significantly increases the risk of acute respiratory failure and poor outcomes. Clinicians should be aware of this risk, especially in patients with pulmonary involvement. Although specific protocols are unavailable, prompt diagnosis and management may enhance outcomes. Additional research is necessary to understand the long-term effects of TB-COVID-19 coinfection, particularly as COVID-19 becomes endemic.
Diagnosing non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) in patients unable to produce sputum spontaneously requires invasive procedures to obtain valid respiratory specimens. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the results of microbiological tests performed on respiratory samples of 132 patients affected by NTM-PD. In the diagnostic workout, 98 patients performed both induced sputum (IS) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and were enrolled in our study. A total of 93 out of 98 BAL samples (95%) were culture-positive for mycobacteria, whereas only 67/153 (44%) induced sputum cultures were positive for NTM (p < 0.001). Molecular identification of NTM with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in 48/64 BAL (75%) and in 47/139 (34%) IS samples (p < 0.001). Patients affected by nodular-bronchiectatic form were 65/98 (66%): BAL culture was positive in 95% of cases (62/65 BAL), while only 30/99 IS cultures were positive (30%; p < 0.001). PCR was positive in 76% of BAL samples examined (26/34) and in 26% of the IS samples (24 out of 91) (p < 0.001). Among 33 patients with a fibro-cavitary radiological pattern, 65% of IS (35/54) were culture-positive for NTM, whereas 94% of cases (31/33) had a positive culture for NTM from BAL (p = 0.002). PCR was positive in 73% of BAL samples tested (22/30) and 48% of IS samples tested (23/48) (p = 0.031). Our results confirm BAL mycobacterial culture as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary mycobacteriosis. FBS with BAL should be performed in every patient with a strong suspicion of NTM-PD, if other respiratory samples are repeatedly negative. Sputum induction is a useful technique to obtain valid respiratory samples when patients are unable to produce spontaneous sputum, especially in the outpatient setting. However, during the diagnostic workup of NTM-PD, we should not forget that PCR and mycobacterial culture of induced sputum have a lower yield than when performed on BAL, especially in the nodular-bronchiectatic form of the disease.
Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) has been associated with tuberculosis (TB), but the true incidence is unknown. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the PTE prevalence in TB patients hospitalized at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases L. Spallanzani during the January 2016–December 2021 period. Retrospective data collection and evaluation were conducted. Among 1801 TB patients, 29 (1.61%) exhibited PTE. Twenty (69%) had comorbidities; eleven (37.9%) had predisposing factors for PTE. Nineteen (65.5%) had extensive TB disease. The commonest respiratory symptoms were cough (37.9%), dyspnea (31%), chest pain (10.3%), and hemoptysis (6.9%). Twenty-five (86.2%) had elevated serum D-dimer levels. An increased prevalence of PTE from 0.6% in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period to 4.6% in the pandemic period was found. Acute respiratory failure and extensive TB disease increased significantly in the pandemic period. The increase in PTE could be explained by the increased severity of TB in patients in the pandemic period and by increased clinical suspicion and, consequently, increased requests for D-dimer testing, including in patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients with extensive pulmonary disease are at high risk of developing PTE. Clinicians should be aware of this potentially life-threatening complication of TB, and patients should receive a thromboembolism risk assessment.
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) secondary to ATT treatment (TB-DILI) is reported in 2–28% of patients. We present here a series of clinical cases of suspected DILI arising during antituberculosis treatment, studied with the aid of liver biopsy. Methods: this was a retrospective descriptive study including 10 tuberculosis patients who underwent liver biopsy for suspected TB-DILI at the “Lazzaro Spallanzani” Institute from 2017 to 2022. Results: Ten patients who underwent LB were extracted from the database and included in the retrospective study cohort. According to the clinical classification, eight patients had hepatocellular liver injury, one patient had cholestatic injury, and another had mixed-type injury. Histopathological diagnosis revealed liver damage due to DILI in 5/10 (50%) cases. In one case, liver biopsy showed necrotizing granulomatous hepatitis. Conclusions: Severe and persistent elevation of hepatic transaminases, hepatic cholestasis despite discontinuation of therapy, and other suspected hepatic conditions are indications for liver biopsy, which remains a valuable tool in the evaluation of selected tuberculosis patients with suspected DILI for many reasons. However, the decision to perform a liver biopsy should be based on clinical judgment, considering the benefits and risks of the procedure.