Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, European Center for Research in Medical Imaging, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
Prof. David Taïeb
Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, European Center for Research in Medical Imaging, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors belonging to the family of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma neoplasms. Despite advances in understanding the pathogenesis of these tumors, the growth potential and clinical outcome of individual cases remains largely unpredictable. Over several decades, surgical resection has long been the treatment of choice for HNPGLs. However, increasing experience in various forms of radiosurgery has been reported to result in curative-like outcomes, even for tumors localized in the most inaccessible anatomical areas. The emergence of such new therapies challenges the traditional paradigm for the management of HNPGLs. This review will assist and guide physicians who encounter patients with such tumors, either from a diagnostic or therapeutic standpoint. This review will also particularly emphasize current and emerging knowledge in genetics, imaging, and therapeutic options as well as the health-related quality of life for patients with HNPGLs.
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a significant medical challenge. Prostate cancer cells can develop mechanisms to resist androgen deprivation therapy, such as AR overexpression, AR mutations, alterations in AR coregulators, increased steroidogenic signaling pathways, outlaw pathways, and bypass pathways. Various treatment options for CRPC exist, including androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, localized or systemic therapeutic radiation, and PARP inhibitors. However, more research is needed to combat CRPC effectively. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of the disease and the development of new therapeutic strategies will be crucial in improving patient outcomes. The present work summarizes the current knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms that promote CRPC, including both AR-dependent and independent pathways. Additionally, we provide an overview of the currently approved therapeutic options for CRPC, with special emphasis on chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and potential combination strategies.
Our objective was to evaluate 18F-FDG PET uptake in patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic chromaffin-derived tumors. Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive unrelated patients with chromaffin tumors, including 9 patients with genetically determined disease, were studied. A combination of preoperative imaging work-up, surgical findings, and pathologic analyses was used to classify the patients into 2 groups: those with nonmetastatic disease (presumed benign, n = 18) and those with metastatic tumors (n = 10). 18F-FDG PET was performed in all cases. Visual and quantitative analyses were individually graded for each tumor. Somatic mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase subunits B and D and Von-Hippel Lindau genes were also evaluated in 6 benign sporadic tumor samples. Results: All but 2 patients showed significantly increased 18F-FDG uptake on visual analysis. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ranged from 1.9 to 42 (mean ± SD, 8.2 ± 9.7; median, 4.6) in nonmetastatic tumors and 2.3 to 29.3 (mean ± SD, 9.7 ± 8.4; median, 7.4) in metastatic tumors. No statistical difference was observed between the groups (P = 0.44), but succinate dehydrogenase–related tumors were notable in being the most 18F-FDG–avid tumors (SUVmax, 42, 29.3, 21, 17, and 5.3). Succinate dehydrogenase and Von-Hippel Lindau–related tumors had a significantly higher SUVmax than did neurofibromatosis type 1 and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A syndrome–related tumors (P = 0.02). 18F-FDG PET was superior to 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine in all metastatic patients but one. By contrast, 18F-FDG PET underestimated the extent of the disease, compared with 6-18F-fluorodopa PET, in 5 patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma. However, succinate dehydrogenase mutations (germline and somatic) and functional dedifferentiation do not adequately explain 18F-FDG uptake since most tumors were highly avid for 18F-FDG. Conclusion:18F-FDG PET positivity is almost a constant feature of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. It may be considered a molecular signature of such tumors, although which aspect of the plethora of molecular changes associated with dedifferentiation, germline genetic defects, or the adaptive response to hypoxia is responsible for this characteristic requires further elucidation.
5 December 2015 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging