Jennifer Cronin

Jennifer Cronin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 August 2018 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJennifer Cronin
Jennifer Cronin
GAGabrial Anandarajah
Gabrial Anandarajah
ODOlivier Dessens
Olivier Dessens
Major transformation of the global energy system is required for climate change mitigation. However, energy demand patterns and supply systems are themselves subject to climate change impacts. These impacts will variously help and hinder mitigation and adaptation efforts, so it is vital they are well understood and incorporated into models used to study energy system decarbonisation pathways. To assess the current state of understanding of this topic and identify research priorities, this paper critically reviews the literature on the impacts of climate change on the energy supply system, summarising the regional coverage of studies, trends in their results and sources of disagreement. We then examine the ways in which these impacts have been represented in integrated assessment models of the electricity or energy system. Studies tend to agree broadly on impacts for wind, solar and thermal power stations. Projections for impacts on hydropower and bioenergy resources are more varied. Key uncertainties and gaps remain due to the variation between climate projections, modelling limitations and the regional bias of research interests. Priorities for future research include the following: further regional impact studies for developing countries; studies examining impacts of the changing variability of renewable resources, extreme weather events and combined hazards; inclusion of multiple climate feedback mechanisms in IAMs, accounting for adaptation options and climate model uncertainty.

1 January 2019 in Energy Strategy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PCPablo E. Carvajal
Pablo E. Carvajal
FLFrancis G.N. Li
Francis G.N. Li
Rafael SoriaRafael Soria
Rafael Soria
JCJennifer Cronin
Jennifer Cronin
GAGabrial Anandarajah
Gabrial Anandarajah
YMYacob Mulugetta
Yacob Mulugetta

16 May 2020 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJennifer Cronin
Jennifer Cronin
FZFlorian Zabel
Florian Zabel
ODOlivier Dessens
Olivier Dessens
GAGabrial Anandarajah
Gabrial Anandarajah
Bioenergy is expected to play a critical role in climate change mitigation. Most integrated assessment models assume an expansion of agricultural land for cultivation of energy crops. This study examines the suitability of land for growing a range of energy crops on areas that are not required for food production, accounting for climate change impacts and conservation requirements. A global fuzzy logic model is employed to ascertain the suitable cropping areas for a number of sugar, starch and oil crops, energy grasses and short rotation tree species that could be grown specifically for energy. Two climate change scenarios are modelled (RCP2.6 and RCP8.5), along with two scenarios representing the land which cannot be used for energy crops due to forest and biodiversity conservation, food agriculture and urban areas. Results indicate that 40% of the global area currently suitable for energy crops overlaps with food land and 31% overlaps with forested or protected areas, highlighting hotspots of potential land competition risks. Approximately 18.8 million km2 is suitable for energy crops, to some degree, and does not overlap with protected, forested, urban or food agricultural land. Under the climate change scenario RCP8.5, this increases to 19.6 million km2 by the end of the century. Broadly, climate change is projected to decrease suitable areas in southern regions and increase them in northern regions, most notably for grass crops in Russia and China, indicating that potential production areas will shift northwards which could potentially affect domestic use and trade of biomass significantly. The majority of the land which becomes suitable is in current grasslands and is just marginally or moderately suitable. This study therefore highlights the vital importance of further studies examining the carbon and ecosystem balance of this potential land‐use change, energy crop yields in sub‐optimal soil and climatic conditions and potential impacts on livelihoods.

6 April 2019 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBen Parkes
Ben Parkes
JCJennifer Cronin
Jennifer Cronin
ODOlivier Dessens
Olivier Dessens
BSBenjamin Sultan
Benjamin Sultan
We applied two metrics, apparent temperature and humidex, to calculate heat stress in both present and future climates. We use an ensemble of CORDEX-Africa simulations to estimate heat stress during a baseline period and at two specific warming levels, 2 and 4 ∘C above pre-industrial. The increase in temperatures and changes to the precipitation distribution under climate change are projected to increase the intensity of heat stress events in Sahelian Africa and introduce new heat stress events in Northern and Central Africa. As the intensity of heat stress increases, it is expected that the use of energy-intensive cooling will increase. The energy system, therefore, will need to be able to supply more energy to power fans or air conditioning units. The cooling demand to turn a heat stress event into a non-heat stress event is computed. This value is then weighted by the population to find the total cooling required to prevent heat stress across the continent. Country-level results indicate that the greatest increases in cooling demand will occur in countries with densely populated regions, most notably Nigeria. Supplying this additional cooling demand will present the greatest challenge to less developed countries like Somalia. We find the least-cost future energy system that meets the projected increase in demand and derive the increase in energy system costs with the TIAM-UCL model. The total increase in energy costs to prevent heat stress is found to be $51bn by 2035 and $487bn by 2076.

1 January 2020 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJulia Tomei
Julia Tomei
JCJennifer Cronin
Jennifer Cronin
HAHéctor David Agudelo Arias
Héctor David Agudelo Arias
SMSamir Córdoba Machado
Samir Córdoba Machado
MMMaycol F. Mena
Maycol F. Mena
GAGabrial Anandarajah
Gabrial Anandarajah

4 May 2021 in Research Square
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
LALucy Allington
Lucy Allington
CCCarla Cannone
Carla Cannone
IPIOANNIS PAPPIS
IOANNIS PAPPIS
KBKarla Cervantes Barron
Karla Cervantes Barron
WUWill Usher
Will Usher
HRH-Holger Rogner
H-Holger Rogner
Energy system modelling can be used to assess the implications of different scenarios and support improved policymaking. However, access to data is often a barrier to starting energy system modelling in developing countries, thereby causing delays. Therefore, this article provides data that can be used to create a simple zero order energy system model for Zambia, which can act as a starting point for further model development and scenario analysis. The data are collected entirely from publicly available and accessible sources, including the websites and databases of international organizations, journal articles, and existing modelling studies. This means that the dataset can be easily updated based on the latest available information or more detailed and accurate local data. These data were also used to calibrate a simple energy system model using the Open Source Energy Modelling System (OSeMOSYS) and three stylized scenarios (Fossil Future, Least Cost and Net Zero by 2050) for 2020–2050. The assumptions used and results of these scenarios are presented in the appendix as an illustrative example of what can be done with these data. This simple model can be adapted and further developed by in-country analysts and academics, providing a platform for future work.