Árún K. Sigurðardóttir

Dr. Árún K. Sigurðardóttir

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2005 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ÁSÁrún K. Sigurðardóttir
Árún K. Sigurðardóttir

1 January 2016 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Beata DobrowolskaBeata Dobrowolska
Beata Dobrowolska
IMIan McGonagle
Ian McGonagle
RKRoslyn Kane
Roslyn Kane
CJChristine S. Jackson
Christine S. Jackson
BKBarbara Kegl
Barbara Kegl
Alvisa PaleseAlvisa Palese
Alvisa Palese

14 January 2020 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSonja Stelly Gustafsdottir
Sonja Stelly Gustafsdottir
ÁSÁrún K. Sigurðardóttir
Árún K. Sigurðardóttir
SASolveig A. Arnadottir
Solveig A. Arnadottir
GHGudmundur T. Heimisson
Gudmundur T. Heimisson
LMLena Mårtensson
Lena Mårtensson
Background: Health literacy (HL) is defined as the knowledge and competences of people to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. It is an important factor in ensuring positive health outcomes, yet Iceland is one of many countries with limited knowledge of HL and no valid HL measurement. The aim of this study was to translate the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire- short version (HLS-EU-Q16) into Icelandic, adapt the version, explore its psychometric properties and establish preliminary norms. Methods: The HLS-EU-Q16 translation model included three steps: 1) translation-back-translation of HLS-EU-Q16 including specialists’ review (n = 6); 2) cognitive interviewing of lay people (n = 17); and 3) psychometric analysis with survey participants. The HLS-EU-Q16 includes 16 items, with scores ranges from zero (low/no HL) to 16 (high HL). Statistics included were descriptive, internal consistency measured by Cronbach’s α, exploratory factor analysis, and multivariate linear regression. Results: After the translation and cognitive interviewing, 11 of the HLS-EU-Q16 items were reworded to adapt the instrument to Icelandic culture while maintaining their conceptual objectives. Survey participants were 251. Internal consistency of the translated and adapted instrument was α = .88. Four factors with eigenvalues > 1.0 explained 62.6% of variance. Principal component analysis with Oblimin rotation presented four latent constructs, “Processing and Using Information from the Doctor” (4 items, α = .77), “Processing and Using Information from the Family and Media” (4 items, α = .85), “Processing Information in Connection to Healthy Lifestyle” (5 items, α = .76), and “Finding Information about Health Problems/Illnesses” (3 items, α = .73). Lower self-rated health was an independent predictor of lower HL (β = −.484, p = .008). Preliminary norms for HL ranged from five to 16 (M 13.7, SD ± 2.6) with 72.5% with sufficient HL (score 13–16), 22% with problematic HL (score 9–12) and 5.5% with inadequate HL (score 0–8). Conclusions: The Icelandic version of HLS-EU-Q16 is psychometrically sound, with reasonably clear factor structure, and comparable to the original model. This opens possibilities to study HL in Iceland and compare the results internationally. The translation model introduced might be helpful for other countries where information on HL is missing based on lack of validated tools.

1 July 2007 in Patient Education and Counseling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÁSÁrún K. Sigurðardóttir
Árún K. Sigurðardóttir
HJHelga Jonsdottir
Helga Jonsdottir
RBRafn Benediktsson
Rafn Benediktsson

1 January 2014 in International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alvisa PaleseAlvisa Palese
Alvisa Palese
AZAdelaida Zabalegui
Adelaida Zabalegui
ÁSÁrún K. Sigurðardóttir
Árún K. Sigurðardóttir
MBMichael Bergin
Michael Bergin
Beata DobrowolskaBeata Dobrowolska
Beata Dobrowolska
CJChristine Jackson
Christine Jackson
The Bologna Declaration and the subsequent processes is the single most important reform of higher education taking place in Europe in the last 30 years. Signed in 1999, it includes 46 European Union countries and aimed to create, a more coherent, compatible, comparable and competitive European Higher Education Area. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the Bologna Declaration achievements in nursing education at 2010 within eight countries that first signed the Declaration on 1999. Researchers primarily identified national laws, policy statements, guidelines and grey literature; then, a literature review on Bologna Declaration implementation in nursing was conducted on the Medline and CINAHL databases. Critical analyses of these documents were performed by expert nurse educators. Structural, organizational, functional and cultural obstacles are hindering full Bologna Process implementation in nursing education within European Economic Area. A call for action is offered in order to achieve a functionally unified system within nursing.

5 January 2015 in International Nursing Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Beata DobrowolskaBeata Dobrowolska
Beata Dobrowolska
IMI. McGonagle
I. McGonagle
CJC. Jackson
C. Jackson
Ros KaneRos Kane
Ros Kane
Esther CabreraEsther Cabrera
Esther Cabrera
Alvisa PaleseAlvisa Palese
Alvisa Palese