Background: Advanced hormone-receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer is a common and a very heterogeneous disease. Hormone therapy is the main first line treatment of choice, given alone or in combination with other agents that have shown to improve patient outcomes, Nevertheless, treatment remains generally palliative rather than curative. Sequencing of such treatment remains challenging, especially with resurgence of variable resistance patterns. Multiple attempts have been made to overcome resistance and improve patient survival, yet resistance remains not very well understood and metastatic cancer remains a disease with dismal prognosis. Methods: In this paper, we searched pubmed database as well as local and international meetings for all studies discussing advanced and metastatic hormone-receptor-positive, her2-negative breast cancer, hormonal treatment, resistance to hormonal treatment, mechanism of resistance, and means to overcome such resistance. Conclusion: There does not exist an optimal treatment sequence for hormone-receptor-positive, her2-negative advanced breast cancer. However, after review of literature, a reasonable approach may be starting with tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, or fulvestrant in absence of visceral crisis, in addition to ensuring adequate ovarian function suppression in pre/peri-menopausal women. Aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant seem to be superior. Resistance to such agents is increasing, mostly attributed to genetic and molecular changes. Multiple modalities are addressed to overcome such resistance including use of CKD4/6 inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors in addition to other agents under study, all with promising results. CDK4/6 inhibitors work best when used in frontline setting. Finally, treatment of breast cancer remains a growing field, and more studies are to be awaited.

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus affects 4.8–78.5 people per 100,000 worldwide, 90% of whom are females. Geography and ethnicity have been shown to significantly affect the prevalence and natural history of the disease. Lupus nephritis affects around half of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Data about systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis in the Middle East are still scarce. In this study, we aimed to describe the characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of all biopsy-proven lupus nephritis patients admitted to the American University of Beirut medical center between January 2000 and December 2018. Patients above 12 years of age who had any International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) class of lupus nephritis on their renal biopsy were included in the study. Results: The study included 55 patients with lupus nephritis. Upon presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus, the most common clinical feature was arthritis, seen in 83% of patients, followed by anemia (82%) and malar rash (48%). In total 93% had positive ANA, 89% had positive anti-dsDNA and 98% of patients had proteinuria. The most common ISN/RPS class of lupus nephritis in our series was IV (49%). At the time of the biopsy 15% of patients underwent dialysis. At 6 months, 11/27 had complete remission, 6/27 had partial remission and 10/27 had no remission. At 1 year, 8/23 had complete remission, 4/23 had partial remission and 11/23 had no remission. During the study period, 15 out of 35 patients available for analysis had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and six out of 34 patients developed end-stage kidney disease requiring renal replacement therapy. In comparison to other series in the region, our series had more males affected, higher creatinine at the time of biopsy and greater degree of proteinuria. Conclusion: Our study provided insight on the demographics, characteristics, and outcomes of lupus nephritis in Lebanon. Interestingly, male gender was present in a quarter of patients. This warrants further investigation and confirmation. We are hoping to expand this experience into a national prospective registry to further characterize this entity in our region.

Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) is a chimeric anti-CD30 antibody, conjugated to anti-tubulin mono-methyl-auristatin. The AETHERA trial revealed increased PFS when BV is used as maintenance therapy for 16 cycles in high risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, this schedule is associated with high cost and significant toxicity. Our objective is to assess the safety and efficacy of four cycles Brentuximab Vedotin as consolidation after ASCT for relapsed/refractory (R/R) HL. We identified 20 consecutive adult patients with R/R HL treated with BV for four cycles as consolidation after ASCT. The indications for BV consolidation included primary refractory disease in 12 patients (60%), early relapse in 6 patients (30%) and extra-nodal involvement in two patients (10%). After a median follow up of 27 months, five (25%) patients relapsed. The median time to relapse was 6 months. Median PFS and OS were not reached. No significant toxicities were reported.

Daratumumab-based triplet regimens have demonstrated efficacy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, direct comparisons between these combinations remain limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 2 such regimens, DPd (daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone) and DKd (daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone), in a real-world RRMM population. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 399 patients with RRMM treated at three academic centers in the US. The patients received either DPd (n = 295) or DKd (n = 104). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), depth of response, and adverse event profiles were compared between the groups. The median PFS was 15 and 12 months in the DPd and DKd groups, respectively. The median OS was 38 months for DPd and was not reached in the DKd cohort. The differences in PFS (P = .2) and OS (P = .5) were not statistically significant. The overall response rates and depth of response were comparable across regimens. DPd was associated with higher rates of hematologic toxicity, particularly grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (36% vs. 23%) and leukopenia (26% vs. 14%), whereas DKd showed a greater incidence of cardiovascular adverse events (29% vs. 18%). DPd and DKd demonstrated similar clinical efficacies in RRMM patients, although their toxicity profiles differed. These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment decisions considering underlying patient comorbidities and prior drug exposure. These findings support the use of either regimen in appropriate patient subsets, based on efficacy and distinct safety profiles.

Obesity is a common health problem among multiple myeloma (MM) patients, and it has been linked to poor clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL). We conducted a secondary analysis of the BMT CTN 0702, a randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of three treatment interventions after a single hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (N = 758), to investigate the impact of visceral obesity, as measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), on clinical outcomes and QOL in MM patients. A total of 549 MM patients, median age 55.5 years, were enrolled in the study. The majority of patients received triple-drug antimyeloma initial therapy before enrollment, and 29% had high- risk disease according to cytogenetic assessment. The median follow-up time was 6 years. There was no significant association between WHR and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in MM patients undergoing HCT. Similarly, body mass index (BMI) did not significantly predict PFS or OS. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between WHR and QOL measures. In conclusion, this study suggests that visceral obesity, as measured by WHR, may not have a significant impact on clinical outcomes in MM patients undergoing HCT. These findings add to the existing literature on the topic and provide valuable information for healthcare professionals and MM patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to investigate other potential factors that may affect clinical outcomes and QOL in this patient population using modern imaging technologies to assess visceral obesity.