This study presents the development of an eco-friendly brick for mining, a sustainable composite material manufactured from gold mine tailings and used cooking oil (UCO) through a thermal oxypolymerization process. Unlike conventional stabilization methods, which often require additional materials beyond tailings or have a high carbon footprint in their production, this approach uses oxypolymerization to transform these two waste products into novel building materials. The use of various percentages of UCO at different heating temperatures was evaluated to identify the optimal mixture, determining that a 9% UCO content and a 9 h cycle are key conditions for inducing fatty acid crosslinking. This logical relationship between heat treatment and dosage allows the organic binder to consolidate the mineral matrix, giving the material a compressive strength of 19.12 MPa and a flexural strength of 8.24 MPa, exceeding the thresholds of the NTE INEN 297 standard. The low water absorption (2.86%) is attributed to the densification of the matrix and the hydrophobic nature of the polymerized oil, indicators of its structural durability. This work is the first to use Ecuadorian tailings as the sole mineral aggregate, validating a high-efficiency, low-impact product for sustainable construction under the principles of the circular economy.

Slope stability in vegetated hillslopes depends on groundwater, geometry, external loading, soil properties, and root reinforcement. This study evaluated a low-plasticity clayey silt (CL–ML) from Loja, Ecuador, under bare soil, Eucalyptus, Pine, Vetiver, and Kikuyu covers. Direct shear tests on root-containing specimens provided equivalent Mohr–Coulomb parameters for limit-equilibrium and PLAXIS 2D strength-reduction analyses considering three slope geometries and three loading conditions: elevated groundwater, groundwater plus an 8 kN m⁻² surcharge, and groundwater, surcharge, and pseudo-static loading. The resulting 90 factor-of-safety values were assessed using scenario-based factorial ANOVA and MANOVA. Geometry and loading explained 41.4% and 35.0% of total variance, respectively, whereas numerical method explained 1.1%. Limit-equilibrium factors of safety were 5.4% higher on average than PLAXIS 2D values. The vegetation-cover main effect was small and marginal (η² = 1.5%, p = 0.051), while significant cover–loading and cover–method interactions indicated a scenario- and method-dependent response. Under pseudo-static loading, Vetiver and Kikuyu showed the highest PLAXIS 2D factors of safety, whereas LEM results remained narrowly grouped, precluding a general ranking of vegetation effectiveness. These findings support scenario-specific evaluation of equivalent root reinforcement in slope-stabilization design.

Sustainable landslide hazard mitigation requires scenario-based assessment of nature-based solutions under realistic hydromechanical and multi-hazard conditions. This study evaluates the mechanical effect of Vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) on slope stability in Loja, southern Ecuador, through an integrated framework combining geotechnical characterization, direct shear testing, finite element modelling, limit equilibrium analysis, and targeted statistical evaluation. Three fine-grained soils, classified as CH, MH, and ML, were analysed under baseline groundwater conditions, groundwater with an 8 kN/m² surcharge, and groundwater with surcharge plus pseudo-static seismic loading. Vetiver reinforcement increased apparent cohesion by 8.92–27.65% and internal friction angle by 6.90–17.43%, with the highest cohesion gain in ML soil. Numerical results showed that stabilization was controlled by soil type, slope geometry, loading condition, and interaction between the 2.0 m root-reinforced layer and the governing failure mechanism. Under surcharge loading, FS for ML at 0.5H:1V increased from 1.056 to 1.450. Under combined loading, FS increased from 0.217 to 1.440 for ML at 1H:1V and from 0.587 to 2.060 for CH at 1H:1V. Targeted ANOVA/MANOVA for MH soil confirmed the influence of geometry and combined loading. Therefore, Vetiver should be considered a complementary, site-specific, and risk-informed mitigation measure rather than a universal stabilization solution.