Erika do Carmo Ota

Dr. Erika do Carmo Ota


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 May 2026 in Biomass
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JOJuliana Dias de Oliveira
Juliana Dias de Oliveira
Ana Carolina Amorim OrricoAna Carolina Amorim Orrico
Ana Carolina Amorim Orrico
LILuis Inoue
Luis Inoue
MTMichely Tomazi
Michely Tomazi
TSTarcila Silva
Tarcila Silva
MJMarco Antonio Previdelli Orrico Junior
Marco Antonio Previdelli Orrico Junior
Fish-processing residues represent a significant environmental challenge due to their high moisture and nitrogen contents, which favor greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during degradation. This study evaluated how different waste management strategies affect GHG emissions from fish waste, including conventional composting (Bulk), composting amended with biochar (BulkBioch), burial with soil (S), and burial with soil plus sawdust (BulkS). Daily emissions of CH4, N2O, and CO2 were monitored, and cumulative emissions were modeled using generalized additive models. Composting treatments (Bulk and BulkBioch) released higher CO2, suggesting greater microbial degradation, while burial treatments developed earlier anaerobic conditions with reduced decomposition efficiency. Bulk showed the highest cumulative CH4 and CO2 emissions, whereas N2O fluxes were greater in burial methods, reaching 2.18 g N2O kg−1 TS in S. Biochar addition was associated with 15% and 10% lower CH4 and N2O emissions, respectively, and earlier stabilization of CH4 emissions. In global warming potential, BulkBioch presented the lowest climate impact (305 g CO2-eq kg−1 fish), followed by Bulk (338 g CO2-eq kg−1), whereas BulkS reached up to 599 g CO2-eq kg−1. The use of bulking agents in burial resulted in lower CH4 buildup and greater nutrient retention. Overall, combining bulking agents and biochar may represent a promising strategy to mitigate GHG emissions while supporting nutrient conservation.

27 August 2026 in Agriengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EOErika do Carmo Ota
Erika do Carmo Ota
Ana Carolina Amorim OrricoAna Carolina Amorim Orrico
Ana Carolina Amorim Orrico
LILuis Inoue
Luis Inoue
IMIsabella Da Silva Menezes
Isabella Da Silva Menezes
BLBrenda Kelly Viana Leite
Brenda Kelly Viana Leite
TSTarcila Silva
Tarcila Silva
Aquaculture intensification increases waste generation, whose composition may influence methane emissions. This study evaluated the effects of dietary protein and energy sources on nutrient digestibility and the methane production potential of Nile tilapia feces. Nine experimental diets were tested in digestibility assays: one reference diet (RD) and eight test diets containing 80% RD and 20% of an animal or plant ingredient. Feces were collected and subjected to batch anaerobic digestion. Soybean meal and meat and bone meal diets showed the highest apparent digestibility coefficients (ADC) for dry matter (84.1 and 82.6%) and energy (87.3 and 87.9%), whereas poultry by-product meal presented the lowest values. Crude protein digestibility ranged from 78.74% for blood meal diet to 94.3% for soybean meal diet. Feces from poultry by-product meal generated the highest methane potential (260.9 L kg−1 VS), whereas blood meal exhibited the highest methane production per unit of COD removed (310.5 mL g−1 reduced COD). After 10 days, poultry by-product meal accumulated the highest biogas volume, while soybean meal and blood meal showed the lowest. Principal component analysis suggested inverse relationships between nutrient digestibility and fecal biodegradability. Overall, dietary composition influenced nutrient digestibility, physicochemical characteristics of fish feces, and their methane generation potential. This integrated assessment suggests that feed formulation could contribute to strategies aimed at reducing the methane generation potential of aquaculture wastes.

28 October 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EOErika do Carmo Ota
Erika do Carmo Ota
TSTarcila Silva
Tarcila Silva
LRLaurindo Rodrigues
Laurindo Rodrigues
MTMichely Tomazi
Michely Tomazi
Ivan BergierIvan Bergier
Ivan Bergier
LILuis Inoue
Luis Inoue
Methane (CH4) emissions from aquaculture can be enhanced by organic waste accumulation and oxygen-limited conditions, yet field-based emission estimates remain scarce, particularly for intensive tilapia production in above-ground tanks in Brazil. This study evaluated how aquaculture waste composition and oxygen availability affect CH4 emissions and quantified emissions from a commercial intensive Nile tilapia production system. A controlled experiment assessed water and sediment characteristics and CH4 emissions during decomposition of feed, feces, and fish carcasses under contrasting residue combinations and aeration conditions. Field measurements quantified diffusive and ebullitive CH4 fluxes from production tanks and a sedimentation pond during 13 sampling campaigns conducted between February 2023 and November 2024. The non-aerated treatment receiving mixed residues showed the highest CH4 emissions, whereas aeration reduced mean flux by approximately 98.8%. At commercial scale, emissions were concentrated in the sedimentation pond and dominated by ebullition, while emissions from aerated production tanks were negligible. Annual CH4 emissions were estimated at 325.9 kg CH4 ha−1 yr−1, corresponding to 8799 kg CO2-eq ha−1 yr−1 and 0.147 kg CO2-eq kg−1 fish produced during the nursery phase. These findings identify oxygen availability and waste accumulation as key targets for CH4 mitigation through aeration and improved residue management, providing insights into strategies to reduce the environmental impact and support the sustainability of intensive tilapia production.