To identify the frequency of BRCA mutation in patients with high grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients with EOC included fallopian tube cancer or peritoneal cancer with high grade serous or high grade endometrioid were recruited. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were tested and analyzed by next generation sequencing system. A total of 87 patients were recruited; majority of them (88.5%) were EOC, 5.7% fallopian tube cancer, 4.6% peritoneal cancer, and 1.1% synchronous primary ovarian and endometrial cancer. Seventy-four patients (85.1%) had high grade serous carcinoma and 13 patients (14.9%) had high grade endometrioid carcinoma. Germline BRCA mutation was detected in 19 patients (21.8%); 14 patients (16.1%) had BRCA1 mutation and 5 patients (5.7%) had BRCA2 mutation. All BRCA mutations were found in patients with high grade serous carcinoma (25.7%) but none in high grade endometrioid carcinoma. Six from 19 patients (31.6%) who had BRCA mutation had no family history of breast and ovarian cancers. Higher frequency of BRCA mutation was detected in patients with fallopian tube cancer; 3 in 5 patients (60%) followed by peritoneal cancer; 2 in 4 patients (50%), and EOC; 14 in 77 patients (18.2%). The frequency of BRCA mutation in high grade serous carcinoma was 25.7%, none was found in high grade endometrioid carcinoma. High cost, unavailability of genetic testing, limited number of geneticists, may be barriers in limited resource countries. Selected patients especially high grade serous carcinoma should be considered initially.

To compare perioperative outcomes and oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients treated with laparotomy, and laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Endometrial cancer patients who underwent primary surgery from January 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes, including estimated blood loss (EBL), operation time, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and intra and postoperative complications, were reviewed. Recovery time, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Of the total of 218 patients, 143 underwent laparotomy, 47 laparoscopy, and 28 robotic surgery. The laparotomy group had the highest EBL (300, 200, 200 ml, p<0.05) while the robotic group had the longest operative time (302 min) as compared with laparoscopy (180 min) and laparotomy (125 min) (p<0.05). Intra and postoperative complications were not different with any of the surgical approaches. No significant difference in number of lymph nodes retrieved was identified. The longest hospital stay was reported in the laparotomy group (four days) but there was no difference between the laparoscopy (three days) and robotic (three days) groups. Recovery was significantly faster in robotic group than laparotomy group (14 and 28 days, p=0.003). No significant difference in DFS and OS at 21 months of median follow up time was observed among the three groups. Minimally invasive surgery has more favorable outcomes, including lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and faster recovery time than laparotomy. It also has equivalent perioperative complications and short term oncologic outcomes. MIS is feasible as an alternative option to surgery of endometrial cancer.