Using in situ hybridisation, we identified interstitial telomeric sequences in seven chromosomal translocations present in normal and in syndromic subjects. Telomeric sequences were also found at the centromeric ends of a 4p and a 4q caused by centric fission of one chromosome 4. We found that rearrangements leading to interstitial telomeric sequences were of three types: (1) termino-terminal rearrangements with fusion of the telomeres of two chromosomes, of which we report one case; (2) rearrangements in which an acentric fragment of one chromosome fuses to the telomere of another chromosome. We describe four cases of Prader-Willi syndrome with the 15q1-qter transposed to the telomeric repeats of different recipient chromosomes; (3) telomere-centromere rearrangements in which telomeric sequences of one chromosome fuse with the centromere of another chromosome. We describe two examples of these rearrangements in which not only telomeric sequences but also remnants of alphoid sequences were found at the fusion point. Instability at the fusion point of the derivative chromosome was found in the Prader-Willi translocations but we were unable to correlate this instability with culture conditions. The two subjects with the termino-terminal rearrangement and the centric fission respectively have normal phenotypes. The two patients with telomere-centromere fusions were unbalanced for the short arm of an acrocentric chromosome and had failure to thrive; one of them also had dysmorphic facies. We postulate that these phenotypes could be the result of uniparental disomy.

The time required to reach a correct diagnosis is a key concern for rare disease (RD) patients. Diagnostic delay can be intolerably long, often described as an “odyssey” and, for some, a diagnosis may remain frustratingly elusive. The International Rare Disease Research Consortium proposed, as ultimate goal for 2017–2027, to enable all people with a suspected RD to be diagnosed within one year of presentation, if the disorder is known. Subsequently, unsolved cases would enter a globally coordinated diagnostic and research pipeline. In-depth analysis of the genotype through next generation sequencing, together with a standardized in-depth phenotype description and sophisticated high-throughput approaches, have been applied as diagnostic tools to increase the chance of a timely and accurate diagnosis. The success of this approach is evident in the Orphanet database. From 2010 to March 2017 over 600 new RDs and roughly 3600 linked genes have been described and identified. However, combination of -omics and phenotype data, as well as international sharing of this information, has raised ethical concerns. Values to be assessed include not only patient autonomy but also family implications, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, solidarity and reciprocity, which must be respected and promoted and, at the same time, balanced among each other. In this work we suggest that, to maximize patients’ involvement in the search for a diagnosis and identification of new causative genes, undiagnosed patients should have the possibility to: (1) actively participate in the description of their phenotype; (2) choose the level of visibility of their profile in matchmaking databases; (3) express their preferences regarding return of new findings, in particular which level of Variant of Unknown Significance (VUS) significance should be considered relevant to them. The quality of the relationship between individual patients and physicians, and between the patient community and the scientific community, is critically important for optimizing the use of available data and enabling international collaboration in order to provide a diagnosis, and the attached support, to unsolved cases. The contribution of patients to collecting and coding data comprehensively is critical for efficient use of data downstream of data collection.