Noritaka Imamachi

Prof. Dr. Noritaka Imamachi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2007 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMarcello Trevisani
Marcello Trevisani
JSJan Siemens
Jan Siemens
SMSerena Materazzi
Serena Materazzi
DBDiana M. Bautista
Diana M. Bautista
RNRomina Nassini
Romina Nassini
PGPierangelo Geppetti
Pierangelo Geppetti
TRPA1 is an excitatory ion channel expressed by a subpopulation of primary afferent somatosensory neurons that contain substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide. Environmental irritants such as mustard oil, allicin, and acrolein activate TRPA1, causing acute pain, neuropeptide release, and neurogenic inflammation. Genetic studies indicate that TRPA1 is also activated downstream of one or more proalgesic agents that stimulate phospholipase C signaling pathways, thereby implicating this channel in peripheral mechanisms controlling pain hypersensitivity. However, it is not known whether tissue injury also produces endogenous proalgesic factors that activate TRPA1 directly to augment inflammatory pain. Here, we report that recombinant or native TRPA1 channels are activated by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE), an endogenous α,β-unsaturated aldehyde that is produced when reactive oxygen species peroxidate membrane phospholipids in response to tissue injury, inflammation, and oxidative stress. HNE provokes release of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide from central (spinal cord) and peripheral (esophagus) nerve endings, resulting in neurogenic plasma protein extravasation in peripheral tissues. Moreover, injection of HNE into the rodent hind paw elicits pain-related behaviors that are inhibited by TRPA1 antagonists and absent in animals lacking functional TRPA1 channels. These findings demonstrate that HNE activates TRPA1 on nociceptive neurons to promote acute pain, neuropeptide release, and neurogenic inflammation. Our results also provide a mechanism-based rationale for developing novel analgesic or anti-inflammatory agents that target HNE production or TRPA1 activation.

1 June 2009 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGrégory Scherrer
Grégory Scherrer
NINoritaka Imamachi
Noritaka Imamachi
YCYu-Qing Cao
Yu-Qing Cao
CCCandice Contet
Candice Contet
FMFrançoise Mennicken
Françoise Mennicken
ABAllan I. Basbaum
Allan I. Basbaum

7 July 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NINoritaka Imamachi
Noritaka Imamachi
GPGoon Ho Park
Goon Ho Park
HLHyosang Lee
Hyosang Lee
DADavid J. Anderson
David J. Anderson
MSMelvin I. Simon
Melvin I. Simon
SHSang-Kyou Han
Sang-Kyou Han
The mechanisms that generate itch are poorly understood at both the molecular and cellular levels despite its clinical importance. To explore the peripheral neuronal mechanisms underlying itch, we assessed the behavioral responses (scratching) produced by s.c. injection of various pruritogens in PLCβ3- or TRPV1-deficient mice. We provide evidence that at least 3 different molecular pathways contribute to the transduction of itch responses to different pruritogens: 1) histamine requires the function of both PLCβ3 and the TRPV1 channel; 2) serotonin, or a selective agonist, α-methyl-serotonin (α-Me-5-HT), requires the presence of PLCβ3 but not TRPV1, and 3) endothelin-1 (ET-1) does not require either PLCβ3 or TRPV1. To determine whether the activity of these molecules is represented in a particular subpopulation of sensory neurons, we examined the behavioral consequences of selectively eliminating 2 nonoverlapping subsets of nociceptors. The genetic ablation of MrgprD + neurons that represent ≈90% of cutaneous nonpeptidergic neurons did not affect the scratching responses to a number of pruritogens. In contrast, chemical ablation of the central branch of TRPV1 + nociceptors led to a significant behavioral deficit for pruritogens, including α-Me-5-HT and ET-1, that is, the TRPV1-expressing nociceptor was required, whether or not TRPV1 itself was essential. Thus, TRPV1 neurons are equipped with multiple signaling mechanisms that respond to different pruritogens. Some of these require TRPV1 function; others use alternate signal transduction pathways.

1 June 2021 in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYShunsuke Yawata
Shunsuke Yawata
NINoritaka Imamachi
Noritaka Imamachi
SSShinichi Sakura
Shinichi Sakura
HYHanako Yamamoto
Hanako Yamamoto
YSYoji Saito
Yoji Saito

1 January 2016 in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSManabu Sakakihara
Manabu Sakakihara
NINoritaka Imamachi
Noritaka Imamachi
YSYoji Saito
Yoji Saito
The μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist–induced itch is a significant issue associated with analgesic therapies. Research suggested that systemically administered κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists inhibit intrathecal morphine–induced itch in primates. However, serious adverse effects induced by systemically administered KOR agonists may restrict their usefulness in humans. We investigated the effects of intrathecal KOR agonists on intrathecal morphine–mediated itch and antinociception in mice. Mice received intrathecal injections of one of the following drugs: morphine (0.1–1.0 nmol), the selective KOR agonist TRK-820 100 pmol, the combination of morphine 0.3 nmol + TRK-820 (10–100 pmol), and 5 μL of saline. One hour after intraperitoneal administration of the selective KOR antagonist nor-binaltorphimine 1.0 μmol, the effect of TRK-820 100 pmol on intrathecal morphine 0.3 nmol–induced scratching was tested. Total numbers of scratches after intrathecal injection were analyzed. After observing scratching behavior, sedation level was evaluated subjectively. Nociceptive threshold was determined by tail immersion test with intrathecal injections of the following agents: morphine (0.1–1.0 nmol), TRK-820 (10–100 pmol), morphine 0.1 nmol + TRK-820 10 pmol, and 5 μL of saline. Intrathecal TRK-820 dose-dependently inhibited intrathecal morphine-induced scratching compared with that in the saline group. Intraperitoneal nor-binaltorphimine completely inhibited the antiscratching effect of intrathecal TRK-820 100 pmol. The combination of morphine 0.3 nmol and TRK-820 did not alter the sedation score compared with that in the morphine 0.3 nmol group. Morphine 0.1 nmol + TRK-820 10 pmol significantly produced greater thermal antinociceptive effects than morphine 0.1 nmol. We demonstrated that intrathecal KOR agonists exert antipruritic effects on intrathecal morphine–induced itch without affecting sedation. The combination of intrathecal morphine and intrathecal KOR agonists produces more potent antinociceptive effects against a thermal stimulus compared with morphine alone.

1 July 2012 in Anesthesia & Analgesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YNYasuhiro Narai
Yasuhiro Narai
NINoritaka Imamachi
Noritaka Imamachi
YSYoji Saito
Yoji Saito
BACKGROUND: Gabapentin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) attenuate postoperative pain and neuropathic pain in humans. The combination of gabapentin and NSAIDs is effective for postoperative pain and enhances functional recovery after surgery. Intrathecal administration of gabapentin or NSAIDs inhibits hyperalgesia in a rat postoperative pain model. However, there is no information on the effects of intrathecal administration of a combination of gabapentin and NSAIDs. We therefore investigated the effects of intrathecal administration of gabapentin and NSAIDs in a rat model of postoperative pain. METHODS: Rats were prepared for intrathecal catheters under halothane anesthesia. Two days after catheterization, gabapentin (4, 40, or 400 μg per 20 μL of saline), diclofenac sodium, a nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor (2, 20, or 200 μg per 20 μL of 6% glucose), 20 μL saline, 20 μL 6% glucose, and a combination of gabapentin and diclofenac (40 μg gabapentin + 20 μg diclofenac and 4 μg gabapentin + 2 μg diclofenac per 20 μL 6% glucose) were injected intrathecally. We performed a hindpaw incision 30 minutes after injection. Each group consisted of 6 rats. The mechanical threshold was measured to evaluate secondary hyperalgesia using von Frey filaments before intrathecal catheterization and at 2 hours, and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after paw incision. RESULTS: Gabapentin 400 μg attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia for 7 days compared with the control group. Diclofenac 200 μg inhibited hyperalgesia for 5 days compared with the control group. The 40 μg gabapentin + 20 μg diclofenac group had a significantly reduced secondary hyperalgesic response in 2 hours and 1 day compared with 40 μg gabapentin and 20 μg diclofenac, respectively. The 4 μg gabapentin + 2 μg diclofenac group had a significantly reduced secondary hyperalgesic response in 2 hours and 1 day compared with 2 μg diclofenac. The withdrawal threshold on the contralateral paw did not change compared with the preincision threshold. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal administration of gabapentin and diclofenac in combination reduced secondary hyperalgesia at doses having no antihyperalgesic effects when given individually. Our results suggest that gabapentin and diclofenac have an important role in postoperative pain reduction at the spinal level, and that gabapentin augments the antihyperalgesic effects of diclofenac through action in the spinal cord.