Background: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC), also known as stress-induced cardiomyopathy, is an acute but reversible form of left ventricular dysfunction, most commonly triggered by physical or emotional stress. Although well documented in cardiology practice, its occurrence following hepatobiliary surgery is rarely reported. Case presentation: We describe the case of a 67-year-old woman with a history of arterial hypertension and prior cholecystectomy who was admitted for elective hepatobiliary surgery due to choledocholithiasis complicated by a liver abscess. She underwent laparotomy with choledocholithotomy, hepaticojejunostomy, and abdominal drainage. The postoperative course was complicated by intra-abdominal bleeding, requiring reoperation, and subsequent intestinal leakage, necessitating a second re-laparotomy. On the tenth postoperative day after the second surgery, she developed chest discomfort and dyspnea upon minimal exertion. Electrocardiography revealed T-wave inversions in leads V3–V6, while echocardiography demonstrated a reduced ejection fraction of 45% with apical akinesis. Plasma levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT–proBNP) were elevated, whereas troponin remained within normal limits. Coronary angiography excluded obstructive coronary artery disease, and ventriculography confirmed apical ballooning consistent with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Conclusions: This case highlights Takotsubo cardiomyopathy as a rare but important postoperative complication of major hepatobiliary surgery. Awareness of this condition in surgical patients presenting with acute chest symptoms is essential, as timely recognition and differentiation from acute coronary syndrome directly influence management and prognosis.

Background. The existing literature highlights a lack of comparative studies between subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and the impact of misclassification on the epidemiological parameters. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the surgical outcomes. The authors used Poisson regression with modified errors to calculate the risk ratios (RR) and reported post-estimation marginal effects. Coefficient estimates, variance inflation factors, and Pearson’s goodness-of-fit test statistics were used to check for multicollinearity and model fit, respectively. We also performed a reclassification analysis by modeling Klatskin tumors (PCC) as extrahepatic (ECC), reclassifying them as intrahepatic (ICC), and comparing the corresponding changes in estimates. Results. Regression analysis revealed an increased risk of death in patients with ICC (RR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.11–3.78) and PCC (RR = 2.03, 95% CI 0.97–4.24) compared to those with DCC. When PCC was analyzed as an ECC, the ICC revealed an RR of 1.52 (95% CI 0.84–2.73). Further reclassification of PCC showed an RR of 2.04 for ICC (95% CI: 1.53–3.53). The adjusted marginal effects saw a reduction in the death probability for both ICC and ECC. However, post hoc analyses revealed insufficient evidence for differences between the reclassified models. Conclusions. Patients with DCC had slightly better prognosis compared to ICC and PCC. We found no differences in survival between ICC and ECC (combining DCC and PCC). The decrease in mortality risk due to reclassification in both groups was not confirmed statistically. Future studies should focus on statistical evidence when referring to the Will Rogers phenomenon, instead of inferring from raw comparisons.