Purpose Life cycle assessment (LCA) is intended as a quantitative decision support tool. However, the large amount of uncertainty characteristic of LCA studies reduces confidence in results. To date, little research has been reported regarding the comparative sources of uncertainty (and their relative importance) and how, or how commonly, they are quantified in attributional and consequential LCA. This paper answers these questions based on a review of recent LCA studies and methods papers, and advances recommendations for improved practice. Methods All relevant LCA methods papers as well as case studies (amounting to 2687 journal articles) published from 2014 to 2018 in the top seven journals publishing LCA studies were reviewed. Common sources and methods for analysis of uncertainty in both attributional and consequential LCA were described, and their frequency of application evaluated. Observed practices were compared to best practice recommendations from methods papers, and additional recommendations were advanced. Results and discussion Less than 20% of LCA studies published in the past five years reported any kind of uncertainty analysis. There are many different sources of uncertainty in LCA, which can be classified as parameter, scenario or model uncertainty. Parameter uncertainty is most often reported, although the other types are considered equally important. There are also sources of uncertainty specific to each kind of LCA—in particular related to the resolution of multi-functionality problems (i.e. allocation in attributional LCA versus the definition of market-mediated substitution scenarios in consequential LCA). However, there are currently no widely applied methods to specifically account for these sources of uncertainty other than sensitivity analysis. Monte Carlo sampling was the most popular method used for propagating uncertainty results, regardless of LCA type. Conclusions Data quality scores and inherent (i.e. stochastic) uncertainty data are widely available in LCI databases, and researchers should generally be able to define comparable uncertainty information for their primary data. Moreover, uncertainty propagation for parameter uncertainty is supported by LCA modelling software. There are hence no obvious barriers to quantifying parameter uncertainty in LCA studies. More standardized methods based upon context-specific data that strike the right balance between comprehensiveness and usability are, however, necessary in order to better account for both the shared and unique sources of uncertainty in attributional and consequential LCAs. More frequent and comprehensive reporting of uncertainty analysis is strongly recommended for published LCA studies. Improved practices should be encouraged and supported by peer-reviewers, editors, LCI databases and LCA software developers.

Lay cycle lengths in the Canadian egg industry are currently 50 to 52 wk (68-70 wk of age). In light of increased productivity in commercial laying hens over the last few decades, the much longer lay cycle lengths already implemented in other countries, extending lay cycle lengths in Canada, should be considered with careful attention to potential environmental, economic, and animal welfare implications. However, there is a lack of information in the public domain that provides robust evidence of performance levels and potential trade-offs to support comprehensive consideration of the desirability of extending lay cycles beyond current Canadian norms. Hence, a systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was undertaken. Data collection focused primarily on information related to feed-, flock management-, and hen genetics/physiology-related interventions that were studied in literature to support extension of lay cycles (review objective 1), and compiling and analyzing productivity, egg quality, and animal welfare outcomes reported at 70 wk of age or beyond (review objective 2). Several feed-related interventions such as high-protein diets, and probiotics supplements, and flock management interventions such split-feeding were found to potentially improve productivity, and especially egg quality, outcomes in the late laying phase. More studies with bigger flock sizes and in commercial lay facilities need to be undertaken before any of these interventions can be definitively recommended for commercial egg production. Under objective 2, productivity was found to be at acceptable levels well beyond 70 wk of age. Performance on most egg quality traits and animal welfare indicators were also at acceptable levels past 70 wk of age but increased variability was observed beyond ∼80 wk of age. There were also inconclusive indications on how hens in caged housing and white laying hens fare relative to hens in noncaged housing and brown-type layers during the late laying phase. Economic data were limited but suggested that lay cycle lengths beyond 90 wk might not generated net economic benefits.

The field crop industry in Canada is a source of both significant economic benefits and environmental impacts. Environmental impacts include land and energy use, as well as greenhouse gas (GHG) and other emissions. Impacts also accrue upstream of the field in the product supply chain, from the production of such inputs as fertilizers and pesticides. There are currently two types of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA)—attributional LCA (ALCA) and consequential LCA (CLCA)—that may be used to study the life cycle impacts of products such as field crops. ALCA is a retrospective methodology that presents a snapshot of average, “status quo” conditions. CLCA is a prospective methodology that presents the potential implications of changes in a product system, including any associated market-mediated changes in supply or demand in other product systems. Thus, CLCAs can be used to assess large-scale changes in the field crop industry, including its relationship to other sectors and processes, such as the production of biofuel or of food for both human and animal consumption. The aim of this paper is to review and curate the knowledge derived through published CLCA studies that assessed the impacts of changes to field crop production systems on the life cycle resource use and emissions associated with the agricultural products, with a focus on their relevance to temperate climate conditions. The current study also highlights how previous studies, including ALCAs and farm management recommendations, can be used to inform the changes that should be studied using CLCA. The main challenges to conducting CLCAs include identifying the system boundaries, marginal products and processes that would be impacted by changes to field crop production. Marginal markets and product systems to include can be determined using economic equilibrium models, or information from local experts and industry reports. In order to conduct ISO-compliant CLCAs, it is necessary to include multiple relevant environmental impact categories, and to perform robust data quality and uncertainty analyses.

A carbon footprint analysis following the ISO 14067 standard reveals that Canadian field crops have generally much lower footprints than those of international competitors due to differences in soil carbon flux and nitrous oxide emissions. Transportation-to-market of Canadian crops is proportionately important, but related emissions are often more than offset by low production-related emissions. In extreme cases, Canadian crops could be shipped to western European markets an additional 17 times before their carbon footprint would break even with crops grown in Europe.

The study analyzed energy, environmental impact, and costs in intensive broiler production systems in the southeast of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, comparing scenarios with and without photovoltaic systems. Four configurations were evaluated, considering different ventilation types (positive and negative pressure) and photovoltaic generation. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), with a functional unit of 1 kg of live weight of chicken and a cradle-to-gate approach, indicated that photovoltaic systems reduce between 2.58 t and 4.96 t of CO₂-eq annually, in addition to offering better energy efficiency. Economically, sheds with positive pressure ventilation have the lowest cost–benefit ratios, while the feeding subsystem was the one that contributed the most to global warming, among the environmental impact categories evaluated in the LCA. Photovoltaic systems demonstrated the potential to reduce electricity costs between 19.4% and 26.5% per year. However, coffee husks used as chicken litter accounted for 36.5% of production costs, highlighting the need for more economical alternatives. It was concluded that photovoltaic systems are a viable solution to reduce environmental impacts and increase profitability, reinforcing the importance of resource-use optimization strategies in poultry farming.