Stefania Stefani

Prof. Stefania Stefani

Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences Department, Section of Microbiology – University of Catania, Catania, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 March 2015 in Nature Reviews Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TBThomas U. Berendonk
Thomas U. Berendonk
Célia ManaiaCélia Manaia
Célia Manaia
CMChristophe Merlin
Christophe Merlin
DFDespo Fatta-Kassinos
Despo Fatta-Kassinos
ECEddie Cytryn
Eddie Cytryn
JMJose Martinez
Jose Martinez

24 July 2012 in Future Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Maria Lina MezzatestaMaria Lina Mezzatesta
Maria Lina Mezzatesta
FGFloriana Gona
Floriana Gona
SSStefania Stefani
Stefania Stefani
Species of the Enterobacter cloacae complex are widely encountered in nature, but they can act as pathogens. The biochemical and molecular studies on E. cloacae have shown genomic heterogeneity, comprising six species: Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter hormaechei, Enterobacter kobei, Enterobacter ludwigii and Enterobacter nimipressuralis, E. cloacae and E. hormaechei are the most frequently isolated in human clinical specimens. Phenotypic identification of all species belonging to this taxon is usually difficult and not always reliable; therefore, molecular methods are often used. Although the E. cloacae complex strains are among the most common Enterobacter spp. causing nosocomial bloodstream infections in the last decade, little is known about their virulence-associated properties. By contrast, much has been published on the antibiotic-resistance features of these microorganisms. In fact, they are capable of overproducing AmpC β-lactamases by derepression of a chromosomal gene or by the acquisition of a transferable ampC gene on plasmids conferring the antibiotic resistance. Many other resistance determinants that are able to render ineffective almost all antibiotic families have been recently acquired. Most studies on antimicrobial susceptibility are focused on E. cloacae, E. hormaechei and E. asburiae; these studies reported small variations between the species, and the only significant differences had no discriminating features.

3 January 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Silvia VivarelliSilvia Vivarelli
Silvia Vivarelli
RSRossella Salemi
Rossella Salemi
Saverio CandidoSaverio Candido
Saverio Candido
Luca FalzoneLuca Falzone
Luca Falzone
MSMaria Santagati
Maria Santagati
Massimo LibraMassimo Libra
Massimo Libra
Cancer is a multifactorial pathology and it represents the second leading cause of death worldwide. In the recent years, numerous studies highlighted the dual role of the gut microbiota in preserving host’s health. Gut resident bacteria are able to produce a number of metabolites and bioproducts necessary to protect host’s and gut’s homeostasis. Conversely, several microbiota subpopulations may expand during pathological dysbiosis and therefore produce high levels of toxins capable, in turn, to trigger both inflammation and tumorigenesis. Importantly, gut microbiota can interact with the host either modulating directly the gut epithelium or the immune system. Numerous gut populating bacteria, called probiotics, have been identified as protective against the genesis of tumors. Given their capability of preserving gut homeostasis, probiotics are currently tested to help to fight dysbiosis in cancer patients subjected to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Most recently, three independent studies show that specific gut resident species may potentiate the positive outcome of anti-cancer immunotherapy. The highly significant studies, uncovering the tight association between gut microbiota and tumorigenesis, as well as gut microbiota and anti-cancer therapy, are here described. The role of the Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), as the most studied probiotic model in cancer, is also reported. Overall, according to the findings here summarized, novel strategies integrating probiotics, such as LGG, with conventional anti-cancer therapies are strongly encouraged.

1 April 2012 in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStefania Stefani
Stefania Stefani
DCDoo Ryeon Chung
Doo Ryeon Chung
JLJodi Lindsay
Jodi Lindsay
AFAlex W. Friedrich
Alex W. Friedrich
AKAngela M. Kearns
Angela M. Kearns
FMFiona M. MacKenzie
Fiona M. MacKenzie

1 April 2013 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPaul E Goss
Paul E Goss
BLBrittany L Lee
Brittany L Lee
TBTanja Badovinac-Crnjevic
Tanja Badovinac-Crnjevic
KSKathrin Strasser-Weippl
Kathrin Strasser-Weippl
YCYanin Chavarri-Guerra
Yanin Chavarri-Guerra
GAGustavo Azenha
Gustavo Azenha

25 July 2024 in Epidemiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luigi La ViaLuigi La Via
Luigi La Via
GSGiuseppe Sangiorgio
Giuseppe Sangiorgio
SSStefania Stefani
Stefania Stefani
Andrea MarinoAndrea Marino
Andrea Marino
GNGiuseppe Nunnari
Giuseppe Nunnari
Antonino ManiaciAntonino Maniaci
Antonino Maniaci
A dysregulated host response to infection causes organ dysfunction in sepsis and septic shock, two potentially fatal diseases. They continue to be major worldwide health burdens with high rates of morbidity and mortality despite advancements in medical care. The goal of this thorough review was to present a thorough summary of the current body of knowledge about the prevalence of sepsis and septic shock worldwide. Using widely used computerized databases, a comprehensive search of the literature was carried out, and relevant studies were chosen in accordance with predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A narrative technique was used to synthesize the data that were retrieved. The review’s conclusions show how widely different locations and nations differ in terms of sepsis and septic shock’s incidence, prevalence, and fatality rates. Compared to high-income countries (HICs), low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately burdened more heavily. We talk about risk factors, comorbidities, and difficulties in clinical management and diagnosis in a range of healthcare settings. The review highlights the need for more research, enhanced awareness, and context-specific interventions in order to successfully address the global burden of sepsis and septic shock.