Michelle A. Mathiason

Ms. Michelle A. Mathiason

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2005 in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BRBrenda L. Rooney
Brenda L. Rooney
CSCharles W. Schauberger
Charles W. Schauberger
MMMichelle A. Mathiason
Michelle A. Mathiason
Vailable through medical record review at 4, 10, and 15 years. Obesity-related illnesses were recorded 15 years later. RESULTS: A total of 484 (61%) original cohort members were available for follow-up. Weight gain during pregnancy, weight loss by 6 months postpartum, and baseline body mass index (BMI) were all related to current BMI and weight gain at follow-up. Women who breastfed beyond 12 weeks and participated in postpartum aerobic exercise had lower BMI and weight gain 15 years later. By follow-up, 13% had developed diabetes or prediabetes. Thirty percent had developed heart disease, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Baseline BMI and weight change over 15 years were significant predictors of both diseases. Smoking status at last follow-up was also a significant predictor of heart disease or pre–heart disease. CONCLUSION: Excess pregnancy weight gain and failure to lose weight in an appreciable time are indicators of obesity in midlife. Excess weight gain and obesity status are predictors of diabetes and heart disease, although pregnancy-related weight changes alone are not directly related. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II-2...

7 October 2010 in Maternal and Child Health Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BRBrenda L. Rooney
Brenda L. Rooney
MMMichelle A. Mathiason
Michelle A. Mathiason
CSCharles W. Schauberger
Charles W. Schauberger

1 December 2014 in The American Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JZJonathan D. Zellmer
Jonathan D. Zellmer
MMMichelle A. Mathiason
Michelle A. Mathiason
KKKara J. Kallies
Kara J. Kallies
SKShanu N. Kothari
Shanu N. Kothari

1 November 2009 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJacob D. Gundrum
Jacob D. Gundrum
MMMichelle A. Mathiason
Michelle A. Mathiason
DMDerek B. Moore
Derek B. Moore
RGRonald S. Go
Ronald S. Go
Purpose We performed a population-based study of primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the United States to determine its incidence and survival trends, prognostic factors, and clinical outcome compared with males with nodal DLBCL. Patients and Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was reviewed to identify patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2005. To study the potential impact of the introduction of rituximab on survival, we used the year 2000 as cutoff point. Results We identified 769 patients with testicular DLBCL. The median age at diagnosis was 68.0 years. The incidence of DLBCL increased over time, with the highest rate among whites (twice that of blacks). The median overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 4.6 years, whereas the disease-specific survival (DSS) rates at 3, 5, and 15 years were 71.5%, 62.4%, and 43.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of worse DSS were older age, diagnosis before 1986, advanced stage, left testicular involvement, and not having surgery and radiation. The use of radiation did not change significantly over time. When testicular and nodal DLBCL patients were analyzed together, testicular primary was an independent predictor of better OS and DSS. Unlike nodal DLBCL, DSS did not improve in the patients with testicular DLBCL diagnosed after the year 2000. Conclusion The incidence of testicular DLBCL is increasing. Compared with nodal DLBCL, testicular DLBCL patients have a better overall prognosis but are at higher risk of late disease-related deaths. The introduction of rituximab in clinical practice does not seem to improve their early outcome.

2 December 2016 in Rheumatology International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCCorjena Cheung
Corjena Cheung
JWJean F. Wyman
Jean F. Wyman
UBUlf Gunnar Bronas
Ulf Gunnar Bronas
TMTeresa McCarthy
Teresa McCarthy
KRKyle Rudser
Kyle Rudser
MMMichelle A. Mathiason
Michelle A. Mathiason

13 December 2005 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRonald S. Go
Ronald S. Go
KFKathleen A. Frisby
Kathleen A. Frisby
JLJennifer A. Lee
Jennifer A. Lee
MMMichelle A. Mathiason
Michelle A. Mathiason
CMChristine M. Meyer
Christine M. Meyer
KUKathryn E. Umberger
Kathryn E. Umberger
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, only limited data are available regarding clinical trial accrual patterns and the barriers encountered among newly diagnosed patients seen at community‐based cancer centers.METHODS: In the current study, the authors prospectively collected clinical and sociodemographic data from all adult patients seen at a community‐based cancer center who had new cancers diagnosed between 2003–2004. Clinical trial enrollment decisions were noted and factors that prevented accrual were identified.RESULTS: There was a total of 1012 new cancer patients. In 587 patients (58%), clinical trials appropriate for the diagnosis and stage of disease were not available. Among those patients for whom trials were available, 19.8% did not meet eligibility criteria, and only 9.9% of patients were enrolled. Although more trials were found to be available for women compared with men (51% vs. 32%; P < 0.01), the accrual rates were equal (11.2% vs. 7.6%; P = 0.24). Elderly patients comprised approximately 59.4% of those patients with available trials, but they were less likely to be enrolled (5.1% vs. 16.8%; P < 0.01). The major barriers to nonparticipation can be grouped into protocol limitations (68.1%), physician triage (16%), and patient decisions (15.9%). The overall accrual rate when all patients were included was 4% (42 of 1012 patients).CONCLUSIONS: At the study institution, participation in clinical trials is reported to be low. The unavailability of appropriate clinical trials represents the most significant barrier. Continuing efforts to encourage physicians and to educate patients remain necessary. If the current study findings are found to be applicable to other community‐based cancer centers, making a larger variety of clinical trials available to the community may help to improve the accrual of patients to national cancer clinical trials. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.