Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have been proved as an efficient way to improve health care quality. However, the inflexibility in integrating multiple clinical practice guidelines (multi-CPGs), the mass input workload of patient data, and the difficulty in system sharing become barriers of CDSSs implementation. In this paper, we proposed a framework of CDSS for chronic disease based on ontology and service-oriented architecture (SOA) to improve these defects. We used ontology for knowledge base construction on multi-CPGs integration to overcome their differences as well as reduce the input procedure of patient data by ontology reasoning. Furthermore, we built the CDSS on an SOA structure to provide flexibility in system and data sharing, such that patients could get suggestions from the same system for self-management of chronic disease. A typical case was used to validate the CDSS functions and accuracy. Two clients were developed to illustrate the SOA superiority.

Clinical prediction from electronic health records (EHRs) is complicated by pervasive missingness and label scarcity, which make performance sensitive to the match between data conditions and pipeline choice. Choosing the best pipeline for a new incomplete dataset still requires costly trial-and-error. We cast this as an algorithm selection problem and address two bottlenecks—instance scarcity and distance quality—that have so far prevented meta-learning from reaching clinical settings. Graph neural networks offer diverse strategies (patient similarity networks, bipartite imputation graphs, attention-driven feature interaction), yet no single architecture dominates across missingness patterns, and selecting the best pipeline for a new dataset remains a trial-and-error approach. Formal algorithm selection could automate this choice but requires many characterized meta-instances—more than clinical settings typically provide. We propose two solutions: (1) constructive instance augmentation, applying controlled quality perturbations (MCAR and MNAR missingness injection, label trimming) to 20 base EHR datasets to expand the meta-knowledge base to 83 characterized meta-instances, each described by a 10-dimensional missingness fingerprint, without additional model training; and (2) dynamic-supervised metric learning, using differential evolution to optimize fingerprint feature weights so that static distances preserve method-performance similarity captured by dynamic fingerprints, which require model sweeps and are unavailable at deployment. Under base-dataset-level leave-one-dataset-out cross-validation over 21 pipelines, the resulting metric-learned kNN recommender attains the highest win rate (20.5%) among non-oracle strategies on the augmented store, selecting the correct pipeline more often than any fixed default. At deployment, the recommender needs only the 10-dimensional static fingerprint with pre-learned weights; no sweep data is required for new datasets. Cross-domain evaluation on 25 external subsets (colorectal cancer, kidney disease, MIMIC-IV) demonstrates framework modularity: when the fingerprint module is adapted (standard meta-features in place of the missingness-specific set), the recommender achieves regret of 0.025 (55% below random selection).

Objective: Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate significant capabilities in medical text understanding and generation. However, their diagnostic reliability in complex clinical scenarios remains limited. This study aims to enhance LLMs' diagnostic accuracy and clinical reasoning ability. Method: We propose an Etiology-Aware Attention Steering Framework to integrate structured clinical reasoning into LLM-based diagnosis. Specifically, we first construct Clinical Reasoning Scaffolding (CRS) based on authoritative clinical guidelines for three representative acute abdominal emergencies: acute appendicitis, acute pancreatitis, and acute cholecystitis. Next, we develop the Etiology-Aware Head Identification algorithm to pinpoint attention heads crucial for the model's etiology reasoning. To ensure reliable clinical reasoning alignment, we introduce the Reasoning-Guided Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning that embeds etiological reasoning cues into input representations and steers the selected Etiology-Aware Heads toward critical information through a Reasoning-Guided Loss function. Result: On the Consistent Diagnosis Cohort, our framework improves average diagnostic accuracy by 15.65% and boosts the average Reasoning Focus Score by 31.6% over baselines. External validation on the Discrepant Diagnosis Cohort further confirms its effectiveness in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Further assessments via Reasoning Attention Frequency indicate that our models exhibit enhanced reliability when faced with real-world complex scenarios. Conclusion: This study presents a practical and effective approach to enhance clinical reasoning in LLM-based diagnosis. By aligning model attention with structured CRS, the proposed framework offers a promising paradigm for building more interpretable and reliable AI diagnostic systems in complex clinical settings.