Masahito Nakano

Dr. Masahito Nakano

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2013 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSShuji Sumie
Shuji Sumie
ONOsamu Nakashima
Osamu Nakashima
KOKoji Okuda
Koji Okuda
RKRyoko Kuromatsu
Ryoko Kuromatsu
AKAtsushi Kawaguchi
Atsushi Kawaguchi
MSMichio Sata
Michio Sata

11 July 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShigeo Shimose
Shigeo Shimose
HIHideki Iwamoto
Hideki Iwamoto
TNTakashi Niizeki
Takashi Niizeki
TSTomotake Shirono
Tomotake Shirono
YNYu Noda
Yu Noda
TTTakuji Torimura
Takuji Torimura
We sought to investigate the clinical profile(s) associated with the discontinuation of lenvatinib (LEN) due to severe adverse events (DLSAE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study enrolled 177 patients with HCC treated with LEN. Independent factors associated with DLSAE were advanced age, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2, fatigue grade ≥ 3, and appetite loss ≥ 2. The overall survival (OS) in the group that did not require DLSAE was significantly longer compared to the group that did require DLSAE (median survival time (MST): not reached vs. 12.8 months, p < 0.001). Moreover, advanced age was the most important variable for DLSAE in a decision tree analysis. Hypertension and hand-foot-skin-reaction (HFSR) were also significantly associated with longer survival, and the occurrence of hypertension was the earliest predictor for improved prognosis, while appetite loss and development of grade ≥ 3 fatigue were predictive of a poor prognosis. We concluded that the appearance of hypertension has potential as an early surrogate marker to predict improved prognosis. Moreover, careful management to avoid discontinuation of treatment leads to longer survival in patients receiving LEN.

14 February 2014 in Molecular and Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HAHajime Aino
Hajime Aino
SSShuji Sumie
Shuji Sumie
TNTakashi Niizeki
Takashi Niizeki
RKRyoko Kuromatsu
Ryoko Kuromatsu
NTNobuyoshi Tajiri
Nobuyoshi Tajiri
MSMichio Sata
Michio Sata
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there are differences in the clinical characteristics and survival between patients with advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis who received and those who did not receive previous treatment. Between April, 1998 and April, 2012, a total of 419 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis (81 previously untreated and 338 previously treated) were enrolled in this study. The differences in the clinical characteristics, including metastatic sites, were compared between the two groups. In addition, the prognostic predictors among all the patients and among the 81 previously untreated patients were analyzed. The distribution of the major metastatic sites was similar in the two groups; the most frequent site of extrahepatic metastasis was the lungs, followed by the bones, lymph nodes and adrenal glands. The median survival time (MST) among the 419 patients was 6.8 months. The 1‑, 2‑, 3‑ and 5‑year survival rates were 31.6, 15.3, 9.5 and 2.3%, respectively. No significant differences in survival were observed between patients who received and those who did not receive previous treatment. The multivariate analysis revealed that the Child‑Pugh classification, white blood cell count, neutrophil‑lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and primary tumor stage were independent predictors of survival for all the patients and for the 81 previously untreated patients. Differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis were identified between patients who received and those who did not receive previous treatment. Furthermore, intrahepatic tumor status, Child‑Pugh classification, white blood cell count and NLR were demonstrated to be independent predictors of survival in HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis.

19 April 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HIHideki Iwamoto
Hideki Iwamoto
HSHiroyuki Suzuki
Hiroyuki Suzuki
SSShigeo Shimose
Shigeo Shimose
TNTakashi Niizeki
Takashi Niizeki
Masahito NakanoMasahito Nakano
Masahito Nakano
TTTakuji Torimura
Takuji Torimura
Background: Although lenvatinib has become the standard therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the high incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) is an issue. This study aimed to clarify the AEs of lenvatinib and the therapeutic impact of five days-on/two days-off administration (i.e., weekends-off strategy) for lenvatinib. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the therapeutic effects and AEs of 135 patients treated with lenvatinib, and the improvement of tolerability and therapeutic efficacy of 30 patients treated with the weekends-off strategy. We also evaluated lenvatinib-induced vascular changes in tumors and healthy organs using a mouse hepatoma model. Results: The incidence rates of any grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs were 82.1% and 49.6%. Fatigue was the most important AE since it resulted in dose reduction and discontinuation. Of the 30 patients who received weekends-off lenvatinib, 66.7% tolerated the AEs. Although 80.8% of the patients showed progression after dose reduction, the therapeutic response improved in 61.5% of the patients by weekends-off lenvatinib. Notably, weekends-off administration significantly prolonged the administration period and survival (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05). The mouse hepatoma model showed that weekends-off administration contributed to recovery of vascularity in the organs. Conclusion: Weekends-off administration of lenvatinib was useful to recover the therapeutic response and tolerability toward AEs.

16 October 2015 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Masahito NakanoMasahito Nakano
Masahito Nakano
MTMasatoshi Tanaka
Masatoshi Tanaka
RKRyoko Kuromatsu
Ryoko Kuromatsu
HNHiroaki Nagamatsu
Hiroaki Nagamatsu
NTNobuyoshi Tajiri
Nobuyoshi Tajiri
TJthe Kurume Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan
the Kurume Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan
Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is approved for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. However, its therapeutic effect in advanced HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis remains uncertain. This study aimed to prospectively assess the efficacy, safety, and survival risk factors and evaluate the prognostic impact of sorafenib treatment in advanced HCC patients with or without extrahepatic metastasis. Between May 2009 and March 2014, 312 consecutive advanced HCC patients who received sorafenib were enrolled in this study. We evaluated their characteristics and compared the clinical outcomes of those with and without extrahepatic metastasis. Of the enrolled patients, 245 (81%) received sorafenib treatment for more than 1 month, with a median duration of 3.6 months. Eighteen patients demonstrated partial response to sorafenib therapy, 127 had stable disease, and 134 had progressive disease at the first radiologic assessment. The median survival time (MST) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were 10.3 and 3.6 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified gender, Child‐Pugh class, baseline serum des‐gamma‐carboxy prothrombin level, and treatment duration as independent risk factors for survival. Extrahepatic metastasis was detected in 178 patients. However, the MST, PFS, and therapeutic effect were comparable between patients with and without extrahepatic metastasis. The independent risk factors for decreased overall survival in patients with extrahepatic metastasis were similar to those affecting all patients. Our results indicated that sorafenib could be administered for hepatic reserve and as long‐term treatment for advanced HCC patients regardless of their extrahepatic metastasis status.

1 March 2012 in Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TNTakashi Niizeki
Takashi Niizeki
SSShuji Sumie
Shuji Sumie
TTTakuji Torimura
Takuji Torimura
JKJunichi Kurogi
Junichi Kurogi
RKRyoko Kuromatsu
Ryoko Kuromatsu
MSMichio Sata
Michio Sata