To mimic more realistic lung tissue conditions, co-cultures of epithelial and immune cells are one comparatively easy-to-use option. To reveal the impact of immune cells on the mode of action (MoA) of CuO nanoparticles (NP) on epithelial cells, A549 cells as a model for epithelial cells have been cultured with or without differentiated THP-1 cells, as a model for macrophages. After 24 h of submerged incubation, cytotoxicity and transcriptional toxicity profiles were obtained and compared between the cell culture systems. Dose-dependent cytotoxicity was apparent starting from 8.0 µg/cm² CuO NP. With regard to gene expression profiles, no differences between the cell models were observed concerning metal homeostasis, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, confirming the known MoA of CuO NP, i.e., endocytotic particle uptake, intracellular particle dissolution within lysosomes with subsequent metal ion deliberation, increased oxidative stress, and genotoxicity. However, applying a co-culture of epithelial and macrophage-like cells, CuO NP additionally provoked a pro-inflammatory response involving NLRP3 inflammasome and pro-inflammatory transcription factor activation. This study demonstrates that the application of this easy-to-use advanced in vitro model is able to extend the detection of cellular effects provoked by nanomaterials by an immunological response and emphasizes the use of such models to address a more comprehensive MoA.

While the toxicity of metal-based nanoparticles (NP) has been investigated in an increasing number of studies, little is known about metal-based fibrous materials, so-called nanowires (NWs). Within the present study, the physico-chemical properties of particulate and fibrous nanomaterials based on Cu, CuO, Ni, and Ag as well as TiO₂ and CeO₂ NP were characterized and compared with respect to abiotic metal ion release in different physiologically relevant media as well as acellular reactivity. While none of the materials was soluble at neutral pH in artificial alveolar fluid (AAF), Cu, CuO, and Ni-based materials displayed distinct dissolution under the acidic conditions found in artificial lysosomal fluids (ALF and PSF). Subsequently, four different cell lines were applied to compare cytotoxicity as well as intracellular metal ion release in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Both cytotoxicity and bioavailability reflected the acellular dissolution rates in physiological lysosomal media (pH 4.5); only Ag-based materials showed no or very low acellular solubility, but pronounced intracellular bioavailability and cytotoxicity, leading to particularly high concentrations in the nucleus. In conclusion, in spite of some quantitative differences, the intracellular bioavailability as well as toxicity is mostly driven by the respective metal and is less modulated by the shape of the respective NP or NW.

Although exposure to heavy metals such as cadmium and inorganic arsenic has declined in recent decades, they remain prevalent environmental contaminants in food, drinking water, and tobacco smoke. This study aimed to identify and compare molecular endpoints of arsenite and cadmium toxicity at the gene and protein expression levels, with a focus on metal homeostasis, the oxidative stress response and redox-regulated processes. Human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) were used as an in vitro model. First, the appropriate exposure conditions were defined by assessing cytotoxicity and intracellular metal accumulation. The cells were then incubated with 1–10 µM NaAsO₂ or 1–5 µM CdCl₂ for 24 h, after which gene and protein expression were analyzed. When compared to arsenite, cadmium was a markedly stronger inducer of metallothionein (MT) expression, indicating distinct effects on metal homeostasis. Both metals induced a concentration-dependent upregulation of oxidative stress-related genes. Cadmium led to a stronger activation of NF-κB signaling, while arsenite decreased selenoprotein-associated gene expression and affected genes involved ferroptosis regulation. Differences in gene and protein expression patterns were also observed, suggesting that transcriptional responses do not necessarily translate into corresponding changes at the protein level after 24 h. These findings highlight shared and compound-specific mechanisms, as well as the importance of multi-level analyses.

The transition metal copper (Cu) is an essential trace element for humans and serves as a cofactor for numerous enzymes. Therefore, intracellular Cu homeostasis must be tightly regulated. Meanwhile, Cu is increasingly used in industrial and biomedical applications, particularly in nanoparticle (NP) form. However, studies have demonstrated that Cu(II) oxide (CuO) NPs are highly toxic. Therefore, understanding the underlying toxic effects of such compounds is of the utmost importance. In this context, transcriptomic profiling is regarded as a valuable tool. Nevertheless, comparative studies addressing organ-relevant models, such as the liver and lungs, are scarce. Furthermore, no transcriptomic studies have been conducted on human bronchial lung epithelial cells exposed to CuO NPs and Cu²⁺. In this study, we compared the cellular effects of human bronchial lung epithelial cells exposed to both CuO NPs and Cu²⁺ to the effects in human liver cells exposed to Cu²⁺ by applying RNA sequencing. Although cytotoxicity was comparable, we showed that Cu uptake was highly dependent on both the cell type and the form of Cu. The most pronounced concentration-dependent transcriptional changes were observed with CuO NP exposure in BEAS-2B cells. The only differentially expressed genes (DEGs) found by all exposures and treatments were metallothioneins (MTs). The most sensitive targets of Cu-induced toxicity were related to nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFkB), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Furthermore, the effects observed at the transcriptome level were studied at the functional level, such as cell cycle regulation and cytokine release. Thus, we demonstrated that the two cell types differ in susceptibility, and that complementing transcriptome profiling with functional studies provides important mechanistic insights.