Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to illustrate the feasibility of a full digital workflow to design and manufacturing a consecutive series of customized nasoalveolar molding (NAM) appliances in advance for presurgical unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) treatment. Methods: The full digital workflow consisted of acquisition of 3D image data of an infant's maxilla by using intraoral scanner (TRIOS; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark); the initial data were imported into an appropriate computer-aided design (CAD) software environment, the digital model was virtual modified to achieve a harmonic alveolar arch, and generated a consecutive of digital models of each movement stage; the digital model of NAM appliance was designed based on the virtual modified model; bio-compatible material MED610 was used to manufacturing the real NAM appliances by 3D printing. A consecutive series of NAM appliances was delivered to CLP infant before lip surgery. Results: Intraoral scanning was harmless and safer than conventional impression technique for CLP infants. The CAD/3D printing procedures allowed a series of NAM appliances to be designed and manufactured in advance. The clinical results showed that this full digital workflow was efficient, viable and able to estimate the treatment objective. By the end of presurgical NAM treatment, the malposition alveolar segments had been aligned normally, the surrounding soft tissues repositioned. Conclusions: The full digital workflow presented has provided the potential for presurgical NAM treatment of infants with cleft lip and palate. Intraoral scanning served as a starting point, so subsequent virtual treatment planning and CAD/3D printing procedures could realize the full digital workflow, a whole series of customized NAM appliances was manufactured in advance. This method brings the benefits of safety, affectivity and time-saving.

Objective: Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors of infancy. Oral propranolol has achieved great success in treating IHs since 2008. To minimize the systemic side events caused by oral administration of propranolol, topical timolol started to be applied in the treatment of IHs, especially for superficial lesions. Methods: We treated 724 children with superficial IHs using oral propranolol or topical timolol, and investigated the efficacy and safety of the two treatment patterns. Results: Both oral propranolol and topical timolol achieved a satisfactory therapeutic outcome, with an effective response rate of 97 and 96.4%, respectively. No significant differences in visual analog scale (VAS) improvement between the two groups were observed. Occurrence rate of systemic adverse events for patients treated with oral propranolol (3.9%) was significantly higher than that for patients treated with topical timolol (0%). Clinical response was not associated with gender, duration of treatment, lesion location, lesion size, gestational age, and progesterone use during pregnancy, but closely associated with age at treatment initiation, which indicated that younger age at treatment initiation predicted for a better regression rate. Conclusions: We recommend that topical timolol instead of oral propranolol could be the first-line therapy for superficial IHs because of its good efficacy and improved safety.

Selecting either buccal or lingual approach for the mandibular third molar surgical extraction has been an intense debate for years. The aim of this observational retrospective study was to classify the molar based on the proximity to the external cortical bone and analyze the position of inferior alveolar canal (IAC) of each type. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) data of 110 deeply impacted mandibular third molars from 91 consecutive patients were analyzed. A new classification based on the mean deduction value (MD) of buccal-lingual alveolar bone thickness was proposed: MD≥1 mm was classified as buccal position, 1 mm>MD>−1 mm was classified as central position, MD≤−1 mm was classified as lingual position. The study samples were distributed as: buccal position (1.8%) in 2 subjects, central position (10.9%) in 12 and lingual position (87.3%) in 96. Ninety-six molars (87.3%) contacted the IAC. The buccal and inferior IAC course were the most common types in impacted third molar, especially in lingually positioned ones. Our study suggested that amongst deeply impacted mandibular third molars, lingual position occupies the largest proportion, followed by the central and then the buccal type.