Ruth Esther Hogg

Prof. Ruth Esther Hogg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2015 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KWKatie M. Williams
Katie M. Williams
GBGeir Bertelsen
Geir Bertelsen
PCPhillippa Cumberland
Phillippa Cumberland
CWChristian Wolfram
Christian Wolfram
VVVirginie J.M. Verhoeven
Virginie J.M. Verhoeven
CHChristopher J. Hammond
Christopher J. Hammond
To investigate whether myopia is becoming more common across Europe and explore whether increasing education levels, an important environmental risk factor for myopia, might explain any temporal trend. Meta-analysis of population-based, cross-sectional studies from the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium. The E(3) Consortium is a collaborative network of epidemiological studies of common eye diseases in adults across Europe. Refractive data were available for 61 946 participants from 15 population-based studies performed between 1990 and 2013; participants had a range of median ages from 44 to 78 years. Noncycloplegic refraction, year of birth, and highest educational level achieved were obtained for all participants. Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent ≤-0.75 diopters. A random-effects meta-analysis of age-specific myopia prevalence was performed, with sequential analyses stratified by year of birth and highest level of educational attainment. Variation in age-specific myopia prevalence for differing years of birth and educational level. There was a significant cohort effect for increasing myopia prevalence across more recent birth decades; age-standardized myopia prevalence increased from 17.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.6-18.1) to 23.5% (95% CI, 23.2-23.7) in those born between 1910 and 1939 compared with 1940 and 1979 (P = 0.03). Education was significantly associated with myopia; for those completing primary, secondary, and higher education, the age-standardized prevalences were 25.4% (CI, 25.0-25.8), 29.1% (CI, 28.8-29.5), and 36.6% (CI, 36.1-37.2), respectively. Although more recent birth cohorts were more educated, this did not fully explain the cohort effect. Compared with the reference risk of participants born in the 1920s with only primary education, higher education or being born in the 1960s doubled the myopia prevalence ratio-2.43 (CI, 1.26-4.17) and 2.62 (CI, 1.31-5.00), respectively-whereas individuals born in the 1960s and completing higher education had approximately 4 times the reference risk: a prevalence ratio of 3.76 (CI, 2.21-6.57). Myopia is becoming more common in Europe; although education levels have increased and are associated with myopia, higher education seems to be an additive rather than explanatory factor. Increasing levels of myopia carry significant clinical and economic implications, with more people at risk of the sight-threatening complications associated with high myopia.

18 March 2015 in European Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KWKatie M. Williams
Katie M. Williams
VVVirginie J. M. Verhoeven
Virginie J. M. Verhoeven
PCPhillippa Cumberland
Phillippa Cumberland
GBGeir Bertelsen
Geir Bertelsen
CWChristian Wolfram
Christian Wolfram
CHChristopher J. Hammond
Christopher J. Hammond
To estimate the prevalence of refractive error in adults across Europe. Refractive data (mean spherical equivalent) collected between 1990 and 2013 from fifteen population-based cohort and cross-sectional studies of the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium were combined in a random effects meta-analysis stratified by 5-year age intervals and gender. Participants were excluded if they were identified as having had cataract surgery, retinal detachment, refractive surgery or other factors that might influence refraction. Estimates of refractive error prevalence were obtained including the following classifications: myopia ≤−0.75 diopters (D), high myopia ≤−6D, hyperopia ≥1D and astigmatism ≥1D. Meta-analysis of refractive error was performed for 61,946 individuals from fifteen studies with median age ranging from 44 to 81 and minimal ethnic variation (98 % European ancestry). The age-standardised prevalences (using the 2010 European Standard Population, limited to those ≥25 and <90 years old) were: myopia 30.6 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 30.4–30.9], high myopia 2.7 % (95 % CI 2.69–2.73), hyperopia 25.2 % (95 % CI 25.0–25.4) and astigmatism 23.9 % (95 % CI 23.7–24.1). Age-specific estimates revealed a high prevalence of myopia in younger participants [47.2 % (CI 41.8–52.5) in 25–29 years-olds]. Refractive error affects just over a half of European adults. The greatest burden of refractive error is due to myopia, with high prevalence rates in young adults. Using the 2010 European population estimates, we estimate there are 227.2 million people with myopia across Europe.

1 September 2016 in Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNathan G. Lambert
Nathan G. Lambert
HEHanan Elshelmani
Hanan Elshelmani
MSMalkit K. Singh
Malkit K. Singh
FMFiona C. Mansergh
Fiona C. Mansergh
MWMichael Wride
Michael Wride
BABalamurali K. Ambati
Balamurali K. Ambati

10 June 2011 in Human Molecular Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYi Yu
Yi Yu
TBTushar R. Bhangale
Tushar R. Bhangale
JFJesen Fagerness
Jesen Fagerness
SRStephan Ripke
Stephan Ripke
GTGudmar Thorleifsson
Gudmar Thorleifsson
JSJohanna M. Seddon
Johanna M. Seddon
Despite significant progress in the identification of genetic loci for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), not all of the heritability has been explained. To identify variants which contribute to the remaining genetic susceptibility, we performed the largest meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies to date for advanced AMD. We imputed 6 036 699 single-nucleotide polymorphisms with the 1000 Genomes Project reference genotypes on 2594 cases and 4134 controls with follow-up replication of top signals in 5640 cases and 52 174 controls. We identified two new common susceptibility alleles, rs1999930 on 6q21-q22.3 near FRK/COL10A1 [odds ratio (OR) 0.87; P = 1.1 × 10−8] and rs4711751 on 6p12 near VEGFA (OR 1.15; P = 8.7 × 10−9). In addition to the two novel loci, 10 previously reported loci in ARMS2/HTRA1 (rs10490924), CFH (rs1061170, and rs1410996), CFB (rs641153), C3 (rs2230199), C2 (rs9332739), CFI (rs10033900), LIPC (rs10468017), TIMP3 (rs9621532) and CETP (rs3764261) were confirmed with genome-wide significant signals in this large study. Loci in the recently reported genes ABCA1 and COL8A1 were also detected with suggestive evidence of association with advanced AMD. The novel variants identified in this study suggest that angiogenesis (VEGFA) and extracellular collagen matrix (FRK/COL10A1) pathways contribute to the development of advanced AMD.

1 December 2017 in Vision Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGary Bargary
Gary Bargary
JBJenny Bosten
Jenny Bosten
PGPatrick T. Goodbourn
Patrick T. Goodbourn
ALAdam J. Lawrance-Owen
Adam J. Lawrance-Owen
RHRuth Esther Hogg
Ruth Esther Hogg
JMJ.D. Mollon
J.D. Mollon

1 February 2018 in JAMA Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRadha Das
Radha Das
GSGareth Spence
Gareth Spence
RHRuth Esther Hogg
Ruth Esther Hogg
MSMichael Stevenson
Michael Stevenson
UCUsha Chakravarthy
Usha Chakravarthy
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) represents a spectrum of pathological changes that occur in the microvasculature of the eye in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a characteristic feature of DR and an important cause of vision loss in people with diabetes.1 In patients with DME, fluid accumulates within the macular tissue layers as a consequence of failure of the blood-retinal barrier. Typically DME causes blurring and distortion of vision, which is reflected in a reduction in visual acuity (VA). The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR)2 found that 20% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 25% of those with type 2 diabetes will develop DME after 10 years of follow-up.