Background Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays an established bariatric procedure. Although preoperative gastroscopy is recommended to rule out severe pathologies, there is little evidence about the role of routine histopathologic examination of resected specimens. We sought to identify the prevalence of histopathological relevant findings in patients undergoing LSG and to evaluate their impact in clinical practice. Methods A retrospective analysis on a prospectively collected dataset on patients undergoing LSG between August 2009 and May 2018 in two bariatric centers was performed. Demographic and clinical data and histopathological results were analyzed. Results Sixhundred-thrirteen patients were identified, mean age was 43.1 years (14-75), average body mass index was 44.8 kg/m(2)(34.4-73.9). Histopathology revealed abnormal findings in 47.97% of the patients, most common pathology was chronic non-active or minimally to moderate active gastritis (n = 202;32.95%). Among others, Helicobacter-associated gastritis (n = 33;5.38%), intestinal metaplasia (n = 13;2.12%), micronodular enterochromaffine-like cell hyperplasia (n = 2; 0.33%) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n = 6; 0.98%) were present. No malignancies were found. Histopathological results required a change in the postoperative management in 48 patients (7.83%). The costs of histopathological assessment ranged between 0.77% and 2.55% of per-case payment. Conclusion A wide range of histopathological findings occur in specimens after LSG, requiring a relevant number of patients additional therapies or surveillance. Therefore, routine histopathological examination after LSG is recommendable.

Introduction Biliodigestive leaks are typically caused by an insufficiency at the surgical anastomosis. Biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) insufficiencies can lead to bilomas, abscesses and vascular erosion in chronic conditions. Material and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical and radiological records of all patients with biliodigestive insufficiency who received interventional treatment between July 2015 and February 2021. Nine patients (three with unilateral drainage and six with bilateral drainage) were treated with a modified percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD). Clinical success was considered after complete resolution of the peribiliary collections, absence of bile within the surgical drains, radiological patency of the BDA (contrast medium flowing properly through the BDA and no signs of leakage) and haemodynamic stability of the patient without signs of sepsis. Results Clinical success was achieved in all nine patients. No patients required revision surgery to repair their BDA. The mean indwelling drainage time was 34.8±16.5 days. The mean number of interventional procedures performed per patient was 6.6±2.0. Conclusion Patients who present with BDA insufficiency may benefit from interventional radiological techniques. Our modified PTCD resolved the BDA leak in all nine cases and should be considered as a valuable option for the treatment of patients with this complication. Our technique demonstrated to be feasible and effective.

: Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a relevant problem in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study is to implement a bundle of care in order to reduce SSIs in colorectal surgery. Methods: All patients undergoing colorectal surgery between October 2018 and December 2021 will be included in a prospective observational study. Since our colorectal bundle has been established gradually, patients will be grouped in a pre-implementation (2018–2019), implementation (2019–2020) and post implementation phase (2021), in order to assess the effectiveness of the actions undertaken. Primary endpoint of this study will be surgical site infection (SSI) rate, while secondary endpoints encompass potential risk factors for SSIs. We assume that obesity, age, diabetes, alcoholism and smoking may lead to a higher risk for SSIs. Discussion: This study aims to determine whether the colorectal bundle designed and implemented at Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, will lead to a significant reduction of SSIs. The impact of potential risk factors for SSIs will additionally be evaluated. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04677686. Registered retrospectively 18 December 2020. Highlights:

Background/Objectives: Acute infected necrotizing pancreatitis remains associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The step-up approach combines minimal-invasive drainage with endoscopic transgastric or percutaneous necrosectomy and has been shown to improve outcomes compared with open surgery. Laparoscopic-assisted necrosectomy (LAPN) may be performed in cases of infected walled-off necrosis (WON) following percutaneous drainage and is typically carried out using laparoscopic instrumentation. A newly implemented interdisciplinary approach includes sinus tract endoscopy, guided necrosectomy (STEN), which employs flexible endoscopy through a surgically created sinus tract and offers a less invasive and more targeted alternative to LAPN, providing improved visualization of complex necrotic cavities and facilitating repeatable step-up debridement. This study aimed to assess the introduction of STEN compared with LAPN in the management of infected WON within a step-up approach. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with infected walled-off necrosis (WON) treated using a step-up approach between 2019 and 2025 was conducted. Patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous drainage followed by either STEN or LAPN were included. Demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome comprising major complications and 6-month mortality. Secondary outcomes included overall complication rates, need for reinterventions, and length of hospital stay. Results: During the study period, 17 patients were included. All patients were managed using a step-up approach: nine underwent STEN and eight underwent LAPN. In the STEN group, six patients (66.7%) met the primary endpoint, all due to major complications, with no mortality observed. In the LAPN group, the primary endpoint occurred in four patients (50.0%), including one death and three major complications. Conclusions: Our study showed that both STEN and LAPN were effective in treating infected WON within a step-up approach. STEN and LAPN showed comparable outcomes. However, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and with caution given the retrospective design and the small sample size of this study. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings and to better define the role of this technique in the management of infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Schwannomas of the gastrointestinal tract are spindle cell tumors originating from peripheral nerve lining Schwann cells, accounting for 2–6% of all mesenchymal tumor and are benign in 98% of cases. Most commonly, they are asymptomatic and discovered incidentallyin elderly. The preoperative diagnosis is challenging because clinical manifestations and CT findings are nonspecific, and biopsies during colonoscopy are in most cases non conclusive, as in our patient, who presented atypical abdominal pain and hematochezia. The best therapeutic option is a complete surgical resection, which will give the definitive diagnosis by confirming S-100 proteins on the immunohistochemical analysis.