Anusuya Willis

Dr. Anusuya Willis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in Harmful Algae
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMICHELE BURFORD
MICHELE BURFORD
JBJohn Beardall
John Beardall
AWAnusuya Willis
Anusuya Willis
POPhilip Orr
Philip Orr
VMValeria F. Magalhaes
Valeria F. Magalhaes
BNBrett Neilan
Brett Neilan

1 July 2011 in Protist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlessandra De Martino
Alessandra De Martino
ABAna Bartual
Ana Bartual
AWAnusuya Willis
Anusuya Willis
AMAgnes Meichenin
Agnes Meichenin
BVBeatriz Villazán
Beatriz Villazán
CBChris Bowler
Chris Bowler


1 September 2016 in Toxicon
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAnusuya Willis
Anusuya Willis
ACAnn W. Chuang
Ann W. Chuang
JWJason N. Woodhouse
Jason N. Woodhouse
BNBrett Neilan
Brett Neilan
MBMICHELE BURFORD
MICHELE BURFORD

3 March 2020 in Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAnusuya Willis
Anusuya Willis
JWJason N. Woodhouse
Jason N. Woodhouse
Cyanobacteria were the first oxygenic photosynthersizers, evolving ∼3.5 bya, they have since radiated into one of the most diverse and widely distributed phyla of bacteria. Cyanobacterial diversification occurs through ecological adaptation, facilitated by asexual reproduction, homologous recombination and horizontal gene transfer, and selection pressures on ecotypes leading to speciation. Delimiting cyanobacterial species is, thus, fraught with difficulties and a clear taxonomy has not yet been universally accepted. This review discusses diversity and description of cyanobacteria: covering traditional and new methods to define species boundaries and concluding with a focus on the advances made through genomics. Examples from the genera Raphidiopsis, Microcystis, and Prochlorococcus are used throughout. Genome plasticity allows cyanobacteria to rapidly adapt and be resilient to environmental changes, illustrating the means of their persistence, and is an important aspect of their biology. Genomics has revealed generalist and specialist genome strategies, intraspecific diversity, and genome evolution in response to environmental stimuli. New taxonomic definitions will need to account for intraspecific genetic variation, with a species classification that is relevant to a species concept and scientific endeavors. Capturing intraspecific diversity with comparative genomics may provide a new path to species classification. This is demonstrated with two case studies; comparison of available genomes shows differing species delineation of Raphidiopsis and Microcystis. In both genera, species boundaries occur at ∼96% average nucleotide identity (ANI), where homologous recombination is constrained, but speciation of Raphidiopsis raciborskii, R. brookii, and R. curvata has occurred through geographic isolation, whereas available data on Microcystis contain at least 15 species, reflecting, to differing extents, different ecotypes, which may co-exist. Both case studies question the relative importance of species-specific versus habitat specific gene pools as drivers of inter- and intraspecific diversity.

16 November 2005 in Journal of Phycology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAnthony Chiovitti
Anthony Chiovitti
RHRuth E. Harper
Ruth E. Harper
AWAnusuya Willis
Anusuya Willis
ABAntony Bacic
Antony Bacic
PMPaul Mulvaney
Paul Mulvaney
RWRichard Wetherbee
Richard Wetherbee