Sian Hemmings

Prof. Sian Hemmings


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2012 in Molecular Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSS. Evelyn Stewart
S. Evelyn Stewart
DYD Yu
D Yu
JSJ M Scharf
J M Scharf
BNB M Neale
B M Neale
JFJ A Fagerness
J A Fagerness
DPD L Pauls
D L Pauls
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common, debilitating neuropsychiatric illness with complex genetic etiology. The International OCD Foundation Genetics Collaborative (IOCDF-GC) is a multi-national collaboration established to discover the genetic variation predisposing to OCD. A set of individuals affected with DSM-IV OCD, a subset of their parents, and unselected controls, were genotyped with several different Illumina SNP microarrays. After extensive data cleaning, 1465 cases, 5557 ancestry-matched controls and 400 complete trios remained, with a common set of 469 410 autosomal and 9657 X-chromosome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Ancestry-stratified case–control association analyses were conducted for three genetically-defined subpopulations and combined in two meta-analyses, with and without the trio-based analysis. In the case–control analysis, the lowest two P-values were located within DLGAP1 (P=2.49 × 10−6 and P=3.44 × 10−6), a member of the neuronal postsynaptic density complex. In the trio analysis, rs6131295, near BTBD3, exceeded the genome-wide significance threshold with a P-value=3.84 × 10−8. However, when trios were meta-analyzed with the case–control samples, the P-value for this variant was 3.62 × 10−5, losing genome-wide significance. Although no SNPs were identified to be associated with OCD at a genome-wide significant level in the combined trio–case–control sample, a significant enrichment of methylation QTLs (P<0.001) and frontal lobe expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) (P=0.001) was observed within the top-ranked SNPs (P<0.01) from the trio–case–control analysis, suggesting these top signals may have a broad role in gene expression in the brain, and possibly in the etiology of OCD.

24 October 2013 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LDLea K. Davis
Lea K. Davis
DYDongmei Yu
Dongmei Yu
CKClare L. Keenan
Clare L. Keenan
EGEric Gamazon
Eric Gamazon
AKAnuar I. Konkashbaev
Anuar I. Konkashbaev
JSJeremiah M. Scharf
Jeremiah M. Scharf
The direct estimation of heritability from genome-wide common variant data as implemented in the program Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) has provided a means to quantify heritability attributable to all interrogated variants. We have quantified the variance in liability to disease explained by all SNPs for two phenotypically-related neurobehavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette Syndrome (TS), using GCTA. Our analysis yielded a heritability point estimate of 0.58 (se = 0.09, p = 5.64e-12) for TS, and 0.37 (se = 0.07, p = 1.5e-07) for OCD. In addition, we conducted multiple genomic partitioning analyses to identify genomic elements that concentrate this heritability. We examined genomic architectures of TS and OCD by chromosome, MAF bin, and functional annotations. In addition, we assessed heritability for early onset and adult onset OCD. Among other notable results, we found that SNPs with a minor allele frequency of less than 5% accounted for 21% of the TS heritability and 0% of the OCD heritability. Additionally, we identified a significant contribution to TS and OCD heritability by variants significantly associated with gene expression in two regions of the brain (parietal cortex and cerebellum) for which we had available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Finally we analyzed the genetic correlation between TS and OCD, revealing a genetic correlation of 0.41 (se = 0.15, p = 0.002). These results are very close to previous heritability estimates for TS and OCD based on twin and family studies, suggesting that very little, if any, heritability is truly missing (i.e., unassayed) from TS and OCD GWAS studies of common variation. The results also indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures. Family and twin studies have shown that genetic risk factors are important in the development of Tourette Syndrome (TS) and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). However, efforts to identify the individual genetic risk factors involved in these two neuropsychiatric disorders have been largely unsuccessful. One possible explanation for this is that many genetic variations scattered throughout the genome each contribute a small amount to the overall risk. For TS and OCD, the genetic architecture (characterized by the number, frequency, and distribution of genetic risk factors) is presently unknown. This study examined the genetic architecture of TS and OCD in a variety of ways. We found that rare genetic changes account for more genetic risk in TS than in OCD; certain chromosomes contribute to OCD risk more than others; and variants that influence the level of genes expressed in two regions of the brain can account for a significant amount of risk for both TS and OCD. Results from this study might help in determining where, and what kind of variants are individual risk factors for TS and OCD and where they might be located in the human genome.

18 April 2024 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CNCaroline Nievergelt
Caroline Nievergelt
AMAdam X. Maihofer
Adam X. Maihofer
EAElizabeth G. Atkinson
Elizabeth G. Atkinson
CCChia-Yen Chen
Chia-Yen Chen
KCKarmel W. Choi
Karmel W. Choi
KKKarestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen

1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSharain Suliman
Sharain Suliman
SHSian Hemmings
Sian Hemmings
SSSoraya Seedat
Soraya Seedat
Background: Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin that is involved in the synaptic plasticity and survival of neurons. BDNF is believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of several neuropsychiatric disorders. As findings of BDNF levels in the anxiety disorders have been inconsistent, we undertook to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed BDNF protein levels in anxiety disorders. Methods: We conducted the review using electronic databases and searched reference lists of relevant articles for any further studies. Studies that measured BDNF protein levels in any anxiety disorder and compared these to a control group were included. Effect sizes of the differences in BDNF levels between anxiety disorder and control groups were calculated. Results: Eight studies with a total of 1179 participants were included. Initial findings suggested that BDNF levels were lower in individuals with any anxiety disorder compared to those without (Standard Mean Difference [SMD]=-0.94 [-1.75, -0.12], p≤0.05). This, however, differed with regards to source of BDNF protein (plasma: SMD=-1.31 [-1.69, -0.92], p≤0.01; serum: SMD=-1.06 [-2.27, 0.16], p≥0.01) and type of anxiety disorder (PTSD: SMD=-0.05 [-1.66, 1.75], p≥0.01; OCD: SMD=-2.33 [-4.21, -0.45], p≤0.01). Conclusion: Although BDNF levels appear to be reduced in individuals with an anxiety disorder, this is not consistent across the various anxiety disorders and may largely be explained by the significantly lowered BDNF levels found in OCD. Results further appear to be mediated by differences in sampling methods. Findings are, however, limited by the lack of research in this area, and given the potential for BDNF as a biomarker of anxiety disorders it would be useful to clarify the relationship further.

1 October 2017 in Psychosomatic Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSian Hemmings
Sian Hemmings
SMStefanie Malan-Müller
Stefanie Malan-Müller
LHLeigh L. Mmed (Psych) van Den Heuvel
Leigh L. Mmed (Psych) van Den Heuvel
BDBrittany A. Demmitt
Brittany A. Demmitt
MSMaggie Stanislawski
Maggie Stanislawski
CLChristopher Lowry
Christopher Lowry
Objective: Inadequate immunoregulation and elevated inflammation may be risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and microbial inputs are important determinants of immunoregulation; however, the association between the gut microbiota and PTSD is unknown. This study investigated the gut microbiome in a South African sample of PTSD-affected individuals and trauma-exposed (TE) controls to identify potential differences in microbial diversity or microbial community structure. Methods: The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 was used to diagnose PTSD according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria. Microbial DNA was extracted from stool samples obtained from 18 individuals with PTSD and 12 TE control participants. Bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene V3/V4 amplicons were generated and sequenced. Microbial community structure, α-diversity, and β-diversity were analyzed; random forest analysis was used to identify associations between bacterial taxa and PTSD. Results: There were no differences between PTSD and TE control groups in α- or β-diversity measures (e.g., α-diversity: Shannon index, t = 0.386, p = .70; β-diversity, on the basis of analysis of similarities: Bray-Curtis test statistic = –0.033, p = .70); however, random forest analysis highlighted three phyla as important to distinguish PTSD status: Actinobacteria, Lentisphaerae, and Verrucomicrobia. Decreased total abundance of these taxa was associated with higher Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale scores (r = –0.387, p = .035). Conclusions: In this exploratory study, measures of overall microbial diversity were similar among individuals with PTSD and TE controls; however, decreased total abundance of Actinobacteria, Lentisphaerae, and Verrucomicrobia was associated with PTSD status.

19 July 2016 in Current Environmental Health Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChristopher Lowry
Christopher Lowry
DSDavid G. Smith
David G. Smith
PSPhilip H. Siebler
Philip H. Siebler
DSDominic Schmidt
Dominic Schmidt
CSChristopher E. Stamper
Christopher E. Stamper
GRGraham A. W. Rook
Graham A. W. Rook