Daniela Berg

Prof. Daniela Berg


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 March 2014 in Movement Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDaniela Berg
Daniela Berg
RPRonald B. Postuma
Ronald B. Postuma
BBBastiaan Bloem
Bastiaan Bloem
PCPiu Chan
Piu Chan
BDBruno Dubois
Bruno Dubois
GDGünther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl
With advances in knowledge disease, boundaries may change. Occasionally, these changes are of such a magnitude that they require redefinition of the disease. In recognition of the profound changes in our understanding of Parkinson's disease (PD), the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society (MDS) commissioned a task force to consider a redefinition of PD. This review is a discussion article, intended as the introductory statement of the task force. Several critical issues were identified that challenge current PD definitions. First, new findings challenge the central role of the classical pathologic criteria as the arbiter of diagnosis, notably genetic cases without synuclein deposition, the high prevalence of incidental Lewy body (LB) deposition, and the nonmotor prodrome of PD. It remains unclear, however, whether these challenges merit a change in the pathologic gold standard, especially considering the limitations of alternate gold standards. Second, the increasing recognition of dementia in PD challenges the distinction between diffuse LB disease and PD. Consideration might be given to removing dementia as an exclusion criterion for PD diagnosis. Third, there is increasing recognition of disease heterogeneity, suggesting that PD subtypes should be formally identified; however, current subtype classifications may not be sufficiently robust to warrant formal delineation. Fourth, the recognition of a nonmotor prodrome of PD requires that new diagnostic criteria for early‐stage and prodromal PD should be created; here, essential features of these criteria are proposed. Finally, there is a need to create new MDS diagnostic criteria that take these changes in disease definition into consideration. © 2014 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

20 April 2021 in Nature Reviews Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDaniela Berg
Daniela Berg
PBPer Borghammer
Per Borghammer
SFSeyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad
Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad
SHSebastian Heinzel
Sebastian Heinzel
JHJacob Horsager
Jacob Horsager
RPRonald B. Postuma
Ronald B. Postuma

1 September 2003 in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDaniela Berg
Daniela Berg
Carsten HolzmannCarsten Holzmann
Carsten Holzmann
OROlaf Riess
Olaf Riess

1 November 2008 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDaniela Berg
Daniela Berg
JGJana Godau
Jana Godau
UWUwe Walter
Uwe Walter

25 August 2018 in Movement Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RPRonald B. Postuma
Ronald B. Postuma
WPWerner Poewe
Werner Poewe
ILIrene Litvan
Irene Litvan
SLSimon J G Lewis
Simon J G Lewis
ALAnthony E. Lang
Anthony E. Lang
DBDaniela Berg
Daniela Berg

26 October 2005 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDaniela Berg
Daniela Berg
KSKatherine J. Schweitzer
Katherine J. Schweitzer
PLPetra Leitner
Petra Leitner
AZAlexander Zimprich
Alexander Zimprich
PLPeter Lichtner
Peter Lichtner
TGThomas Gasser
Thomas Gasser
There is increasing evidence of genetic contribution to the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. The identification of mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene has shed new light on genetic variations responsible for autosomal dominantly inherited Parkinson's disease. In this analysis, the most comprehensive published so far, we screened a second large series comprising 53 families with Parkinson's disease for mutations in the LRRK2 gene by direct sequencing to further determine the frequency of the mutation and evaluate the clinical phenotype to establish a genotype/phenotype relation. For comparison, all novel and known mutations were investigated in a cohort of 337 patients with apparently sporadic Parkinson's disease and a cohort of 1200 control subjects using an ABI 7900 Allelic Detection system. We identified 7 more families with LRRK2 variations in the 53 families with Parkinson's disease. Four of these are novel amino acid substitutions (R793M, Q930R, S1096C, S1228T). Because of incomplete penetrance and possible phenocopies pathogenic relevance of the Q930R and S1096C mutations as well as for the previously described A3342G splice site mutation could not be established with certainty. The so far most common mutation (G2019) was not detected in our large cohort. Late onset and typical l-dopa responsive parkinsonian features were generally observed, often accompanied by impairment of executive functions and high interference values in neuropsychological testing, as well as sleeping disturbances but rare hallucinations. There were no abnormalities in electrophysiological investigations. Distinct intrafamily and interfamily differences could be observed, including the clinical presentation of diffuse Lewy body disease in one patient. The frequent finding of cerebral atrophy on MRI and less substantia nigra hyperechogenicity compared with idiopathic Parkinson's disease on transcranial ultrasound needs to be confirmed in further studies. Together with the findings obtained in 46 families in our first study, LRRK2 mutations, therefore, account for 13% of apparently autosomal dominant families in our population with varying but still generally typical clinical presentation of Parkinson's disease.