Christopher N. Watling

Dr. Christopher N. Watling

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 January 2020 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gregoire LarueGregoire Larue
Gregoire Larue
CWChristopher N. Watling
Christopher N. Watling
ABAlexander A. Black
Alexander A. Black
JWJoanne M. Wood
Joanne M. Wood
MKMahrokh Khakzar
Mahrokh Khakzar

1 October 2018 in Computers in Human Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DJDaniel Johnson
Daniel Johnson
MKMadison Klarkowski
Madison Klarkowski
KVKellie Vella
Kellie Vella
CPCody Phillips
Cody Phillips
MMMitchell McEwan
Mitchell McEwan
CWChristopher N. Watling
Christopher N. Watling

1 March 2010 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChristopher N. Watling
Christopher N. Watling
GPGavan R. Palk
Gavan R. Palk
JJames Freeman
James Freeman
JDJeremy D. Davey
Jeremy D. Davey

8 November 2023 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHMahmudul Hasan
Mahmudul Hasan
CWChristopher N. Watling
Christopher N. Watling
GLGrégoire S. Larue
Grégoire S. Larue
Drowsiness behind the wheel is a major road safety issue with efforts focused on developing drowsy driving detection systems. However, most drowsy driving detection studies using physiological signals have focused on developing a 'black box' machine learning classifier, with much less focus on 'robustness' and 'explainability'-two crucial properties of a trustworthy machine learning model. Therefore, this study has focused on using multiple validation techniques to evaluate the overall performance of such a system using multiple supervised machine learning-based classifiers and then unbox the black box model using explainable machine learning. Driving was simulated via a 30-minute psychomotor vigilance task while the participants reported their level of subjective sleepiness with their physiological signals: electroencephalogram (EEG), electrooculogram (EOG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) being recorded. Six different techniques, comprising subject-dependent and independent techniques were applied for model validation and robustness testing with three supervised machine learning classifiers, namely K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machines (SVM) and random forest (RF), and two explainable methods, namely SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis and partial dependency analysis (PDA) were leveraged for model interpretation. The study identified the leave one participant out, a subject-independent validation technique to be most useful, with the best sensitivity of 70.3 %, specificity of 82.2 %, and an accuracy of 80.1 % using the random forest classifier in addressing the autocorrelation issue due to inter-individual differences in physiological signals. Moreover, the explainable results suggest most important physiological features for drowsiness detection, with a clear cut-off in the decision boundary. The implication of the study will ensure a rigorous validation for robustness testing and an explainable machine learning approach to developing a trustworthy drowsiness detection system and enhancing road safety. The explainable machine learning-based results show promise in real-life deployment of the physiological-signal based in-vehicle trustworthy drowsiness detection system, with higher reliability and explainability, along with a lower system cost.

1 February 2021 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChristopher N. Watling
Christopher N. Watling
MHMahmudul Hasan
Mahmudul Hasan
Gregoire LarueGregoire Larue
Gregoire Larue