Daniel Wang

Dr. Daniel Wang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 October 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDeborah Lai
Deborah Lai
DWDaniel Wang
Daniel Wang
JCJoshua Calvano
Joshua Calvano
ARAli S. Raja
Ali S. Raja
SHShuhan He
Shuhan He
COVID-19 has highlighted an opportunity for medical professionals to engage in online Public Engagement with Science (PES). Currently a popular platform for PES is Reddit. Reddit provides an Ask Me Anything (AMA) format for subject matter experts to answer questions asked by the public. On March 11, 2020, from 2:00 to 4:00pm EST, two Emergency Department physicians from Massachusetts General Hospital hosted an AMA session on coronavirus. We retroactively conducted an analysis of the questions and answers from this AMA session in order to better understand the public’s concerns around coronavirus and identify future opportunities for medical experts to leverage the Reddit AMA format in communicating with the general public. Results suggested that participants sought not only to obtain information, but to engage in discussion, and did so with each other in the absence of expert responses. The majority of bi-directional discussion occurred between participants. Due to the volume of questions and ratio of experts to participants, not all questions were answered. More posts provided facts or opinions, than posts that providing resources or requesting resources.

13 September 2022 in Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDaniel Wang
Daniel Wang
CLCrystal Li
Crystal Li
NHNicole Hatchard
Nicole Hatchard
GCGeorge C. Chang Chien
George C. Chang Chien
JAJohn Alm
John Alm
Context: Shoulder and neck pain are leading causes of disability worldwide. Rotator cuff pathology has strong associations with such pain and is extensively targeted by healthcare practitioners. A dysfunctional lower trapezius muscle has also been shown to contribute to neck and shoulder pain, yet it is often overlooked. Objectives: This systematic review analyzes those with a history of, or who are currently managing, shoulder or neck pain to indicate differences in measures of lower trapezius function when compared to subjects without that pain. Methods: Studies with no age restrictions were included in the study. Studies could determine lower trapezius muscle function with any quantifiable measurement tool or clinical assessment. If the study included a control group (no pain) and a comparator group (pain), and if lower trapezius muscle function was assessed in both, the study was typically included. The significance of the lower trapezius muscle function change was summarized in these pain patients. From a final total of 18 studies identified, level of muscle activity, muscle activation, time to onset, muscle strength, and muscle thickness were reported. Results: The 18 included articles involved 485 participants with shoulder and/or neck pain and 455 without. Half of the shoulder pain studies (6/12), and all of the neck pain studies (6/6), demonstrated that the lower trapezius had a noticeable impact. The lower trapezius muscle in participants with shoulder and neck pain tended to show decreased muscle strength, and decreased time to onset/latency. Conclusions: The findings from this systematic review should be taken into consideration when assessing and treating patients with shoulder and neck pain. Future studies that define the type and duration of shoulder and neck pain, as well as prospectively assessing lower trapezius muscle function in those with and without that pain, are needed.

1 December 2021 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDeborah Lai
Deborah Lai
DWDaniel Wang
Daniel Wang
MMMatthew McGillivray
Matthew McGillivray
SBShadi Baajour
Shadi Baajour
ARAli S Raja
Ali S Raja
SHShuhan He
Shuhan He

1 June 2024 in North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAnkur Kayastha
Ankur Kayastha
KLKirthika Lakshmanan
Kirthika Lakshmanan
MVMichael J. Valentine
Michael J. Valentine
ANAnh Nguyen
Anh Nguyen
KDKaushal Dholakia
Kaushal Dholakia
DWDaniel Wang
Daniel Wang
ChatGPT is an advanced language AI able to generate responses to clinical questions regarding lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being considered to assist clinicians in decision-making. This study compared ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 responses to established NASS clinical guidelines and evaluated concordance. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 were prompted with fifteen questions from The 2012 NASS Clinical Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Clinical questions organized into categories were directly entered as unmodified queries into ChatGPT. Language output was assessed by two independent authors on September 26, 2023 based on operationally-defined parameters of accuracy, over-conclusiveness, supplementary, and incompleteness. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 performance was compared via chi-square analyses. Among the fifteen responses produced by ChatGPT-3.5, 7 (47%) were accurate, 7 (47%) were over-conclusive, fifteen (100%) were supplementary, and 6 (40%) were incomplete. For ChatGPT-4.0, ten (67%) were accurate, 5 (33%) were over-conclusive, 10 (67%) were supplementary, and 6 (40%) were incomplete. There was a statistically significant difference in supplementary information (100% vs. 67%; p=.014) between ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0. Accuracy (47% vs. 67%; p=.269), over-conclusiveness (47% vs. 33%; p=.456), and incompleteness (40% vs. 40%; p=1.000) did not show significant differences between ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 both yielded 100% accuracy for definition and history and physical examination categories. Diagnostic testing yielded 0% accuracy for ChatGPT-3.5 and 100% accuracy for ChatGPT-4.0. Nonsurgical interventions had 50% accuracy for ChatGPT-3.5 and 63% accuracy for ChatGPT-4.0. Surgical interventions resulted in 0% accuracy for ChatGPT-3.5 and 33% accuracy for ChatGPT-4.0. ChatGPT-4.0 provided less supplementary information and overall higher accuracy in question categories than ChatGPT-3.5. ChatGPT showed reasonable concordance to NASS guidelines, but clinicians should caution use of ChatGPT in its current state as it fails to safeguard against misinformation.

28 June 2022 in Pain Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJeimylo Cristobal de Castro
Jeimylo Cristobal de Castro
DWDaniel Wang
Daniel Wang
GCGeorge C Chang Chien
George C Chang Chien
The currently available drugs to treat neuropathic pain do not provide adequate pain management. As such, other treatments including stem cells, platelet-rich plasma and plasma-derived molecules su... Plain language summary The currently available drugs to treat neuropathic pain do not provide adequate pain control. As such, other various regenerative treatments modalities are being explored bec...

31 May 2022 in Regenerative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJeimylo Cristobal de Castro
Jeimylo Cristobal de Castro
EHElvira L Henares-Esguerra
Elvira L Henares-Esguerra
MTMaria Bida Olivia S Tamayo-Shih
Maria Bida Olivia S Tamayo-Shih
DWDaniel Wang
Daniel Wang
GCGeorge C Chang Chien
George C Chang Chien
Aim: To describe the successful treatment of bone marrow edema in the setting of hip osteoarthritis using ultrasound-guided injection of photoactivated leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP).... Plain language summary Aim: To describe the successful treatment of bone marrow swelling in the setting of hip osteoarthritis using ultrasound-guided injection of enhanced platelet-rich plasma (PRP...