Agroecological crop protection (ACP) aims to reduce pesticide reliance by redesigning cropping systems to enhance ecological processes for pest control, yet its feasibility and performance under real farming conditions remains insufficiently documented across crops. This study compares agronomic and ecological outcomes of paired agroecological and control fields (following Swiss standard integrated management) across a Swiss network of commercial farms for three major arable crops in a three-year experiment. We quantified the extent of implementation of 24 different agroecological crop protection practices co-designed with farmers, as well pesticide use reduction, and assessed their effects on weeds, diseases and insect pest pressure, natural enemy abundance, and crop yield, while accounting for environmental factors such as soil properties, weather, and landscape composition. Undersowing, flower strips, mechanical weeding, varietal mixture, false seedbed and push-pull were significantly more implemented on the agroecological field than on the control, and pesticide use was strongly reduced. However, results regarding crop protection and performance were strongly crop-dependent. In wheat, yields were maintained despite slightly higher weed biomass. In barley, ACP limited noxious organisms, yet yields declined, suggesting a combination of factors including non-biotic constraints. In oilseed rape, higher weed biomass and pest pressure led to reduced yields, despite increased natural enemy abundance. Landscape composition, weather conditions and soil characteristics contributed to variability of the response parameters. These results show that ACP can substitute for chemical control in some systems, but the effectiveness depends on crop-specific traits and management practices. Overall, successful pesticide reduction requires context-specific, system-based strategies supported by technical expertise.