Peter Falkai

Prof. Dr. Peter Falkai


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPhil H. Lee
Phil H. Lee
VAVerneri Anttila
Verneri Anttila
HWHyejung Won
Hyejung Won
YFYen-Chen A. Feng
Yen-Chen A. Feng
JRJacob Rosenthal
Jacob Rosenthal
JSJordan Smoller
Jordan Smoller

1 March 2017 in American Journal of Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OHOliver D. Howes
Oliver D. Howes
RMRob McCutcheon
Rob McCutcheon
OAOfer Agid
Ofer Agid
ABAndrea de Bartolomeis
Andrea de Bartolomeis
NBNico J.M. van Beveren
Nico J.M. van Beveren
CCChristoph U. Correll
Christoph U. Correll

7 May 2018 in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDominic B. Dwyer
Dominic B. Dwyer
PFPeter Falkai
Peter Falkai
NKNikolaos Koutsouleris
Nikolaos Koutsouleris
Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry explicitly focus on learning statistical functions from multidimensional data sets to make generalizable predictions about individuals. The goal of this review is to provide an accessible understanding of why this approach is important for future practice given its potential to augment decisions associated with the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of people suffering from mental illness using clinical and biological data. To this end, the limitations of current statistical paradigms in mental health research are critiqued, and an introduction is provided to critical machine learning methods used in clinical studies. A selective literature review is then presented aiming to reinforce the usefulness of machine learning methods and provide evidence of their potential. In the context of promising initial results, the current limitations of machine learning approaches are addressed, and considerations for future clinical translation are outlined.

1 July 2001 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKK. K.Vogeleyab
K. K.Vogeleyab
PBP. Bussfeld
P. Bussfeld
ANA. Newen
A. Newen
SHS. Herrmann
S. Herrmann
FHF. Happé
F. Happé
KKK. K.Zillesbf
K. K.Zillesbf

18 July 2018 in European Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BSBrendon Stubbs
Brendon Stubbs
DVDavy Vancampfort
Davy Vancampfort
MHMats Hallgren
Mats Hallgren
JFJoseph Firth
Joseph Firth
NVNicola Veronese
Nicola Veronese
KKKai G. Kahl
Kai G. Kahl
Physical activity (PA) may be therapeutic for people with severe mental illness (SMI) who generally have low PA and experience numerous life style-related medical complications. We conducted a meta-review of PA interventions and their impact on health outcomes for people with SMI, including schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder. We searched major electronic databases until January 2018 for systematic reviews with/without meta-analysis that investigated PA for any SMI. We rated the quality of studies with the AMSTAR tool, grading the quality of evidence, and identifying gaps, future research needs and clinical practice recommendations. For MDD, consistent evidence indicated that PA can improve depressive symptoms versus control conditions, with effects comparable to those of antidepressants and psychotherapy. PA can also improve cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life in people with MDD, although the impact on physical health outcomes was limited. There were no differences in adverse events versus control conditions. For MDD, larger effect sizes were seen when PA was delivered at moderate-vigorous intensity and supervised by an exercise specialist. For schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, evidence indicates that aerobic PA can reduce psychiatric symptoms, improves cognition and various subdomains, cardiorespiratory fitness, whilst evidence for the impact on anthropometric measures was inconsistent. There was a paucity of studies investigating PA in bipolar disorder, precluding any definitive recommendations. No cost effectiveness analyses in any SMI condition were identified. We make multiple recommendations to fill existing research gaps and increase the use of PA in routine clinical care aimed at improving psychiatric and medical outcomes.

27 July 2012 in The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAlkomiet Hasan
Alkomiet Hasan
PFPeter Falkai
Peter Falkai
TWThomas Wobrock
Thomas Wobrock
JLJeffrey Lieberman
Jeffrey Lieberman
BGBirte Glenthoj
Birte Glenthoj
TSThe Wfsbp Task Force On Treatment Guidelines For Schizophrenia
The Wfsbp Task Force On Treatment Guidelines For Schizophrenia
These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia published in 2005. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful and these guidelines are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F; Bandelow et al. 2008b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242). This first part of the updated guidelines covers the general descriptions of antipsychotics and their side effects, the biological treatment of acute schizophrenia and the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.