Alexandre Faisal-Cury

Alexandre Faisal-Cury


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 April 2022 in Journal of Psychiatric Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAlexandre Faisal-Cury
Alexandre Faisal-Cury
CZCarolina Ziebold
Carolina Ziebold
DRDaniel Maurício de Oliveira Rodrigues
Daniel Maurício de Oliveira Rodrigues
AMAlicia Matijasevich
Alicia Matijasevich

26 February 2016 in Psychology, Health & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAlexandre Faisal-Cury
Alexandre Faisal-Cury
PMPaulo Menezes
Paulo Menezes
JQJulieta Quayle
Julieta Quayle
AMAlicia Matijasevich
Alicia Matijasevich
Purpose: to evaluate the relationship between unplanned pregnancy (UP), a common problem in high and low income countries and maternal depression (MD). Methods: Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study with pregnant women recruited from 10 primary care clinics of the public sector in São Paulo, Brazil. Participants were questioned about pregnancy intention at 20–30 weeks of gestation. The Self Report Questionnaire score >7 was used to evaluated the presence of depression during pregnancy and 11 months after childbirth. Four groups of MD were defined: never; antenatal only; postnatal only; persistent (both antenatal/postnatal). Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between UP and MD, controlling for confounding. Results: Data were analysed for 701 at the postpartum period. Five hundred and sixty-two (67.8%) women did not plan the pregnancy. Women with UP had 2.5 more risk of being depressed during both assessments (during pregnancy and postpartum) when compared to women with a planned pregnancy (RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.47:4.30). In the adjusted models, women with UP were significantly more likely to have persistent depression (RR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2:4.3). Conclusion: UP is an independent risk factor for persistent depression, but not for postpartum depression

1 September 2012 in Maternal and Child Health Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlexandre Faisal-Cury
Alexandre Faisal-Cury
PMPaulo Menezes
Paulo Menezes
ADAna Flávia Pires Lucas D’oliveira
Ana Flávia Pires Lucas D’oliveira
LSLilia Blima Schraiber
Lilia Blima Schraiber
CLClaudia S. Lopes
Claudia S. Lopes

1 December 2012 in Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AFAlexandre Faisal-Cury
Alexandre Faisal-Cury
PMPaulo Menezes
Paulo Menezes
To estimate the association between antenatal and postnatal depression and to examine the role of socioeconomic conditions in the risk of postnatal depression. A prospective cohort study, conducted between May 2005 and January 2006, with 831 pregnant women recruited from primary care clinics in the public sector in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. The presence of antenatal and postnatal depression was measured with the Self Report Questionnaire (SRQ-20). Sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics and obstetric information were obtained through a questionnaire. Crude and adjusted risk ratios (RR), with 95% CI, were calculated using a Poisson regression. The prevalence of postnatal depressive symptoms was 31.2% (95%CI: 27.8-34.8%). Among the 219 mothers who had depressive symptoms, nearly 50% had already shown depressive symptoms during pregnancy. Women who had antenatal depression were 2.4 times more likely to present with postnatal depression than were women who did not have such symptoms during pregnancy. In the multivariate analysis, higher scores for assets (RR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96), higher education (RR: 0.75 95%CI 0.59-0.96), daily contact with neighbors (RR: 0.68, 95%CI 0.51-0.90) and antenatal depression (RR: 2.44, 95%CI 1.93-3.08) remained independently associated with postnatal depression. Antenatal and postnatal depression are highly prevalent in the primary care setting.

1 November 2023 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDaniel Maurício de Oliveira Rodrigues
Daniel Maurício de Oliveira Rodrigues
PMPaulo Rossi Menezes
Paulo Rossi Menezes
ASAna Elise Machado Ribeiro Silotto
Ana Elise Machado Ribeiro Silotto
AHArtur Heps
Artur Heps
NSNathália Martins Pereira Sanches
Nathália Martins Pereira Sanches
AFAlexandre Faisal-Cury
Alexandre Faisal-Cury
Importance: Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and there is increasing interest in nonpharmacological treatments. Auricular acupuncture (AA) is a simple, low-cost, and well-tolerated option, but further studies are needed to establish its efficacy and safety.Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of auricular acupuncture as a treatment for depression.Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 4 university research centers in Brazil, from March to July 2023. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 to 50 years whose score on the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) indicated moderate depression (score 10-14) or moderately severe depression (score 15-19). Exclusion criteria included previous application of AA, risk of suicidal ideation, or severe depression (PHQ-9 score >20). An intent-to-treat analysis and modified intent-to-treat analysis were conducted.Intervention: Participants were randomized into 2 treatment groups, which included specific AA (SA) and nonspecific AA (NSA). Both groups received 12 sessions of AA with semipermanent needles with daily stimulation twice a week over 6 weeks and were followed-up for 3 months. All participants continued with their usual care for ethical reasons. The SA group’s treatment protocol consisted of 6 acupuncture points on the auricular pavilion chosen according to the diagnosis of depression by traditional Chinese medicine (Shenmen, subcortex, heart, lung, liver, and kidney). The NSA group’s acupuncture points were the external ear, the cheek and face area, and 4 nonspecific points in the helix region unassociated with mental health symptoms. A locator device was used to confirm which areas had neuroreactive points.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a reduction of at least 50% in the PHQ-9 score (ie, depression recovery) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included depression recovery at 4 and 6 weeks; depression remission (PHQ-9 score < 5) at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months); and adverse events.Results: A total of 304 participants were screened, and 74 participants (62 women [84%]; median [IQR] age, 29 [23-27] years) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 37 participants randomized to each group (SA and NSA). A total of 47 participants (64%) were followed-up through 3 months. The results showed no statistically significant difference in depressive recovery between the groups at 3 months (14 of 24 participants in the SA group [58%] vs 10 of 23 participants in the NSA group [43%]; risk ratio [RR], 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76-2.45; P = .38). The proportions of depression recovery and remission at 4 and 6 weeks based on the PHQ-9 were higher in the SA group (except for depression recovery at 6 weeks) with no statistically significant differences. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in symptom remission at 3 months (11 of 24 participants in the SA group [46%] vs 3 of 23 participants in the NSA group [13%]; RR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.16-3.34; P = .02) in favor of SA. There were no significant differences in adverse event rates between the groups, evidencing the intervention’s safety. Most participants reported mild pain at the needle application site (33 patients [94%] in the SA group vs 32 patients [91%] in the NSA group). Five participants dropped out of the study due to adverse events.Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that SA over 6 weeks is safe. Although there was no statistically significant difference between groups for the primary efficacy outcome, patients receiving SA did experience greater symptom remission at 3 months. A larger sample size and longer intervention are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of SA for depression.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05855421

1 May 2015 in The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlexandre Faisal-Cury
Alexandre Faisal-Cury
PMPaulo Menezes
Paulo Menezes
JQJulieta Quayle
Julieta Quayle
AMAlicia Matijasevich
Alicia Matijasevich
SDSimone Grilo Diniz
Simone Grilo Diniz