Elizabeth Isenring

Prof. Elizabeth Isenring

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2017 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJann Arends
Jann Arends
PBPatrick Bachmann
Patrick Bachmann
VBVickie Baracos
Vickie Baracos
NBNicole Barthelemy
Nicole Barthelemy
HBHartmut Bertz
Hartmut Bertz
Jean Charles PreiserJean Charles Preiser
Jean Charles Preiser

1 December 2013 in Maturitas
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEkta Agarwal
Ekta Agarwal
MMMichelle Miller
Michelle Miller
AYAlison Yaxley
Alison Yaxley
EIElizabeth Isenring
Elizabeth Isenring

1 October 2013 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEkta Agarwal
Ekta Agarwal
MFMaree Ferguson
Maree Ferguson
MBMerrilyn Banks
Merrilyn Banks
MBMarijka Batterham
Marijka Batterham
JBJudy Bauer
Judy Bauer
EIElizabeth Isenring
Elizabeth Isenring

29 June 2004 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EIElizabeth Isenring
Elizabeth Isenring
SCSandra Capra
Sandra Capra
JBJudy Bauer
Judy Bauer
Malnutrition occurs frequently in patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal (GI) or head and neck area and can lead to negative outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of early and intensive nutrition intervention (NI) on body weight, body composition, nutritional status, global quality of life (QoL) and physical function compared to usual practice in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the GI or head and neck area. Outpatients commencing at least 20 fractions of radiotherapy to the GI or head and neck area were randomised to receive intensive, individualised nutrition counselling by a dietitian using a standard protocol and oral supplements if required, or the usual practice of the centre (general advice and nutrition booklet). Outcome parameters were measured at baseline and 4, 8 and 12 weeks after commencing radiotherapy using valid and reliable tools. A total of 60 patients (51M : 9F; mean age 61.9±14.0 years) were randomised to receive either NI (n=29) or usual care (UC) (n=31). The NI group had statistically smaller deteriorations in weight (P<0.001), nutritional status (P=0.020) and global QoL (P=0.009) compared with those receiving UC. Clinically, but not statistically significant differences in fat-free mass were observed between the groups (P=0.195). Early and intensive NI appears beneficial in terms of minimising weight loss, deterioration in nutritional status, global QoL and physical function in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the GI or head and neck area. Weight maintenance in this population leads to beneficial outcomes and suggests that this, rather than weight gain, may be a more appropriate aim of NI.