Kristina Young

Dr. Kristina Young

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 June 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KYKristina Young
Kristina Young
JBJason R Baird
Jason R Baird
TSTalicia Savage
Talicia Savage
BCBenjamin Cottam
Benjamin Cottam
DFDavid Friedman
David Friedman
MCMarka R Crittenden
Marka R Crittenden
The anecdotal reports of promising results seen with immunotherapy and radiation in advanced malignancies have prompted several trials combining immunotherapy and radiation. However, the ideal timing of immunotherapy with radiation has not been clarified. Tumor bearing mice were treated with 20Gy radiation delivered only to the tumor combined with either anti-CTLA4 antibody or anti-OX40 agonist antibody. Immunotherapy was delivered at a single timepoint around radiation. Surprisingly, the optimal timing of these therapies varied. Anti-CTLA4 was most effective when given prior to radiation therapy, in part due to regulatory T cell depletion. Administration of anti-OX40 agonist antibody was optimal when delivered one day following radiation during the post-radiation window of increased antigen presentation. Combination treatment of anti-CTLA4, radiation, and anti-OX40 using the ideal timing in a transplanted spontaneous mammary tumor model demonstrated tumor cures. These data demonstrate that the combination of immunotherapy and radiation results in improved therapeutic efficacy, and that the ideal timing of administration with radiation is dependent on the mechanism of action of the immunotherapy utilized.

9 April 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAndrew J. Gunderson
Andrew J. Gunderson
TYTomoko Yamazaki
Tomoko Yamazaki
KMKayla McCarty
Kayla McCarty
NFNathaniel Fox
Nathaniel Fox
MPMichaela Phillips
Michaela Phillips
KYKristina Young
Kristina Young
Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) is a multipotent immunosuppressive cytokine. TGFβ excludes immune cells from tumors, and TGFβ inhibition improves the efficacy of cytotoxic and immune therapies. Using preclinical colorectal cancer models in cell type-conditional TGFβ receptor I (ALK5) knockout mice, we interrogate this mechanism. Tumor growth delay and radiation response are unchanged in animals with Treg or macrophage-specific ALK5 deletion. However, CD8αCre-ALK5flox/flox (ALK5ΔCD8) mice reject tumors in high proportions, dependent on CD8+ T cells. ALK5ΔCD8 mice have more tumor-infiltrating effector CD8+ T cells, with more cytotoxic capacity. ALK5-deficient CD8+ T cells exhibit increased CXCR3 expression and enhanced migration towards CXCL10. TGFβ reduces CXCR3 expression, and increases binding of Smad2 to the CXCR3 promoter. In vivo CXCR3 blockade partially abrogates the survival advantage of an ALK5ΔCD8 host. These data demonstrate a mechanism of TGFβ immunosuppression through inhibition of CXCR3 in CD8+ T cells, thereby limiting their trafficking into tumors.

9 August 2022 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TYTomoko Yamazaki
Tomoko Yamazaki
AGAndrew J Gunderson
Andrew J Gunderson
MGMiranda Gilchrist
Miranda Gilchrist
MWMark Whiteford
Mark Whiteford
MKMaria X Kiely
Maria X Kiely
KYKristina Young
Kristina Young

16 August 2016 in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTodd Crocenzi
Todd Crocenzi
BCBenjamin Cottam
Benjamin Cottam
PNPippa Newell
Pippa Newell
RWRonald F. Wolf
Ronald F. Wolf
PHPaul D. Hansen
Paul D. Hansen
MCMarka R. Crittenden
Marka R. Crittenden
Background Preclinical studies have shown synergy between radiation therapy and immunotherapy. However, in almost all preclinical models, radiation is delivered in single doses or short courses of high doses (hypofractionated radiation). By contrast in most clinical settings, radiation is delivered as standard small daily fractions of 1.8-2 Gy to achieve total doses of 50–54 Gy (fractionated radiation). We do not yet know the optimal dose and scheduling of radiation for combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Methods To address this, we analyzed the effect of neoadjuvant standard fractionated and hypofractionated chemoradiation on immune cells in patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results We found that standard fractionated chemoradiation resulted in a significant and extended loss of lymphocytes that was not explained by a lack of homeostatic cytokines or response to cytokines. By contrast, treatment with hypofractionated radiation therapy avoided the loss of lymphocytes associated with conventional fractionation. Conclusion Hypofractionated neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with reduced systemic loss of T cells. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01342224, April 21, 2011; NCT01903083, July 2, 2013.

2 September 2016 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMarka R. Crittenden
Marka R. Crittenden
JBJason Baird
Jason Baird
DFDavid Friedman
David Friedman
TSTalicia Savage
Talicia Savage
LULauren Uhde
Lauren Uhde
MGMichael J. Gough
Michael J. Gough
Mertk on tumor macrophages is a therapeutic target to prevent tumor recurrence following radiation therapy

6 February 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAndrew J Gunderson
Andrew J Gunderson
TYTomoko Yamazaki
Tomoko Yamazaki
KMKayla McCarty
Kayla McCarty
MPMichaela Phillips
Michaela Phillips
AAAlejandro Alice
Alejandro Alice
KYKristina Young
Kristina Young
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a fibrotic stroma with a poor lymphocyte infiltrate, in part driven by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). CAFs, which express fibroblast activation protein (FAP), contribute to immune escape via exclusion of anti-tumor CD8+ T cells from cancer cells, upregulation of immune checkpoint ligand expression, immunosuppressive cytokine production, and polarization of tumor infiltrating inflammatory cells. FAP is a post-proline peptidase selectively expressed during tissue remodeling and repair, such as with wound healing, and in the tumor microenvironment by cancer-associated fibroblasts. We targeted FAP function using a novel small molecule inhibitor, UAMC-1110, and mice with germline knockout of FAP and concomitant knock-in of E. coli beta-galactosidase. We depleted CAFs by adoptive transfer of anti-βgal T cells into the FAP knockout animals. Established syngeneic pancreatic tumors in immune competent mice were targeted with these 3 strategies, followed by focal radiotherapy to the tumor. FAP loss was associated with improved antigen-specific tumor T cell infiltrate and enhanced collagen deposition. However, FAP targeting alone or with tumor-directed radiation did not improve survival even when combined with anti-PD1 therapy. Targeting of CAFs alone or in combination with radiation did not improve survival. We conclude that targeting FAP and CAFs in combination with radiation is capable of enhancing anti-tumor T cell infiltrate and function, but does not result in sufficient tumor clearance to extend survival.