Six change detection procedures were tested using Landsat MultiSpectral Scanner (MSS) images for detecting areas of changes in the region of the Terminos Lagoon, a coastal zone of the State of Campeche, Mexico. The change detection techniques considered were image differencing, vegetative index differencing, selective principal components analysis (SPCA), direct multi-date unsupervised classification, post-classification change differencing and a combination of image enhancement and post-classification comparison. The accuracy of the results obtained by each technique was evaluated by comparison with aerial photographs through Kappa coefficient calculation. Post-classification comparison was found to be the most accurate procedure and presented the advantage of indicating the nature of the changes. Poor performances obtained by image enhancement procedures were attributed to the spectral variation due to differences in soil moisture and in vegetation phenology between both scenes. Methods based on classification were found to be less sensitive at these spectral variations and more robust when dealing with data captured at different times of the year.

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have become a popular tool in the analysis of remotely sensed data. Although significant progress has been made in image classification based upon neural networks, a number of issues remain to be resolved. This paper reviews remotely sensed data analysis with neural networks. First, we present an overview of the main concepts underlying ANNs, including the main architectures and learning algorithms. Then, the main tasks that involve ANNs in remote sensing are described. The limitations and crucial issues relating to the application of the neural network approach are discussed. A brief review of the implementation of ANNs in some of the most popular image processing software packages is presented. Finally, we discuss the application perspectives of neural networks in remote sensing image analysis.

Pixel‐based and object‐oriented classifications were tested for land‐cover mapping in a coal fire area. In pixel‐based classification a supervised Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) algorithm was utilized; in object‐oriented classification, a region‐growing multi‐resolution segmentation and a soft nearest neighbour classifier were used. The classification data was an ASTER image and the typical area extent of most land‐cover classes was greater than the image pixels (15 m). Classification results were compared in order to evaluate the suitability of the two classification techniques. The comparison was undertaken in a statistically rigorous way to provide an objective basis for comment and interpretation. Considering consistency, the same set of ground data was used for both classification results for accuracy assessment. Using the object‐oriented classification, the overall accuracy was higher than the accuracy obtained using the pixel‐based classification by 36.77%, and the user’s and producer’s accuracy of almost all the classes were also improved. In particular, the accuracy of (potential) surface coal fire areas mapping showed a marked increase. The potential surface coal fire areas were defined as areas covered by coal piles and coal wastes (dust), which are prone to be on fire, and in this context, indicated by the two land‐cover types ‘coal’ and ‘coal dust’. Taking into account the same test sites utilized, McNemar’s test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the difference between the two methods. The differences in accuracy expressed in terms of proportions of correctly allocated pixels were statistically significant at the 0.1% level, which means that the thematic mapping result using object‐oriented image analysis approach gave a much higher accuracy than that obtained using the pixel‐based approach..