Irene Grossmann

Irene Grossmann


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2015 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVC.J. Verberne
C.J. Verberne
ZZZ. Zhan
Z. Zhan
EHE. van Den Heuvel
E. van Den Heuvel
IGIrene Grossmann
Irene Grossmann
PDP.M. Doornbos
P.M. Doornbos
TWT. Wiggers
T. Wiggers

12 February 2010 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGIrene Grossmann
Irene Grossmann
JAJohannes K. A. Avenarius
Johannes K. A. Avenarius
WMWalter J. B. Mastboom
Walter J. B. Mastboom
JKJoost M. Klaase
Joost M. Klaase
Background Preoperative staging of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has the potential benefit of altering treatment options when metastases are present. The clinical value of chest computed...

7 October 2011 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGIrene Grossmann
Irene Grossmann
JKJoost M. Klaase
Joost M. Klaase
JAJohannes Ka Avenarius
Johannes Ka Avenarius
IHIgnace de Hingh
Ignace de Hingh
WMWalter Jb Mastboom
Walter Jb Mastboom
TWTheo Wiggers
Theo Wiggers
Advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), either locally advanced, metastasized (mCRC) or both, is present in a relevant proportion of patients. The chances on curation of advanced CRC are continuously improving with modern multi-modality treatment options. For incurable CRC the focus lies on palliation of symptoms, which is not necessarily a resection of the primary tumor. Both situations motivate adequate staging before treatment in CRC. This prospective observational study evaluates the outcomes after the introduction of routine staging with abdominal CT before treatment.

1 February 2014 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IGIrene Grossmann
Irene Grossmann
PDP.M. Doornbos
P.M. Doornbos
JKJoost M. Klaase
Joost M. Klaase
GBGeertruida de Bock
Geertruida de Bock
TWT. Wiggers
T. Wiggers

11 May 2011 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGIrene Grossmann
Irene Grossmann
CVCharlotte Verberne
Charlotte Verberne
GBGeertruida de Bock
Geertruida de Bock
KHKlaas Havenga
Klaas Havenga
IKIdo Kema
Ido Kema
TWTheo Wiggers
Theo Wiggers
Following curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), 30% to 50% of patients will develop recurrent disease. For CRC there are several lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis that early detection of metachronous disease offers a second opportunity for cure. This paper revisits the potential role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in follow-up. A comprehensive review of the literature (1978–2008) demonstrates that the initial promise of serum CEA as an effective surveillance tool has been tarnished through perpetuation of poorly designed studies. Specific limitations included: testing CEA as only an ‘add-on’ diagnostic tool; lack of standardization of threshold values; use of static thresholds; too low measurement frequency. Major changes in localizing imaging techniques and treatment of metastatic CRC further cause a decrease of clinical applicability of past trial outcomes. In 1982, Staab hypothesized that the optimal benefit of serum CEA as a surveillance tool is through high-frequency triage using a dynamic threshold (HiDT). Evidence supporting this hypothesis was found in the biochemical characteristics of serum CEA and retrospective studies showing the superior predictive value of a dynamic threshold. A multi-centred randomized phase III study optimizing the usage of HiDT against resectability of recurrent disease is commencing recruitment in the Netherlands.

1 April 2025 in BMJ Open Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DDDimmy van Dongen
Dimmy van Dongen
JTJaco Tresfon
Jaco Tresfon
FGFrank Guldenmund
Frank Guldenmund
DRDaphne Roos
Daphne Roos
JGJop Groeneweg
Jop Groeneweg
IGIrene Grossmann
Irene Grossmann
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) voicing their views (speaking up) is crucial for patient safety and care quality. Yet, this is underused, especially during multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs), where diverse professionals collaborate to optimise patient treatment plans. Despite the benefits of open communication, HCWs face barriers such as hierarchical dynamics, time constraints and psychological risks. Aim: This study examines factors influencing HCWs’ speaking-up behaviours in MDTMs, focusing on motivators, barriers and dynamics across disciplines. Method: We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with MDTM participants of a gastrointestinal surgery ward, including surgeons, residents, nurses, nursing students, dieticians, ostomy nurses and physical therapists. Data were analysed collaboratively using thematic analysis. Results: Participants are highly motivated to advocate for patients and provide optimal care. However, barriers impact speaking up during MDTMs. Three major themes were identified: (1) time pressure, (2) perception of goals and roles and (3) familiarity among team members. Structural, relational and contextual factors affect HCWs’ ability to speak up, with nurses and paramedics experiencing more hesitancy than physicians. Lack of preparation time, ambiguous objectives, no formal agenda and unfamiliarity among team members hinder contributions, leading to unbalanced input. Conclusion: Findings support a systems-based approach to addressing barriers. Interventions should focus on clear goals, reduced time pressures and enhanced team cohesion, rather than placing the responsibility solely on individuals. For instance, adjusting meeting schedules to accommodate diverse availability improves participation across disciplines. Strengthening familiarity among team members fosters trust and lowers the perceived risks of speaking up, ensuring more balanced contributions during MDTMs.