Stephani Chagoury

Dr. Stephani Chagoury

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2024 in Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Laura GhanemLaura Ghanem
Laura Ghanem
SCStephani Chagoury
Stephani Chagoury
AIAndrea Issa
Andrea Issa
KKKaline Maya Khoury
Kaline Maya Khoury
KKKelly Katherine Karam
Kelly Katherine Karam
MMMilissa Makhlouf
Milissa Makhlouf
Background: The side effects of two related chemicals, ammonium thioglycolate (ATG) and thioglycolic acid (TGA) have been widely highlighted in the world of cosmetics. These thioglycolate compounds are considered essential ingredients in a new technique known as brow lamination. This technique is widely used nowadays, with the aim of changing the eyebrow shape. Aims: To our knowledge, this is the first study to address the possible side effects of brow lamination. Results: The hydrophilic characteristic of ATG and TGA reflects their transdermal absorption through the intracellular and transappendageal pathways. These compounds can affect the skin through allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), characterized by skin irritation, dryness, and erythema. Moreover, these thioglycolates can alter several mechanical and chemical reactions in the eyebrows' hair, therefore affecting their shape, structure, and pigmentation. In addition, these chemicals contained in brow lamination can exert systemic manifestations, at the level of the reproductive, ocular, respiratory, and endocrine systems. Conclusion: More studies should be elaborated to shed light on the possible side effects of this trend. Additionally, further regulations should be taken into consideration to ensure the concentration and the measures applied are convenient to minimize these side effects.

28 May 2026 in Diabetology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAndrea Issa
Andrea Issa
SCStephani Chagoury
Stephani Chagoury
CSCharbel Semaan
Charbel Semaan
TYTatiana Youness
Tatiana Youness
TMTheresa Mazraani
Theresa Mazraani
FHFrederic Harb
Frederic Harb
Background: The prevalence of GDM is increasing and is associated with maternal health and neonatal complications. Therapeutic intervention for this condition is important for the health of both mothers and their unborn children. Objective: The present meta-analysis evaluates the effects of pharmacological, nutritional, and physical activity interventions on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM, including glucometabolic control, weight gain, blood pressure, lipid profiles, and pregnancy complications. Methods: Multiple databases were systematically searched for studies investigating GDM interventions and their effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes, including at least one of the following endpoints: 2 h postprandial glycemia, FBG, HbA1c, triglycerides, cholesterol, weight gain, blood pressure, cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, gestational age at delivery, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal complications, birth weight, preterm birth, Apgar score at 5 min, macrosomia, and NICU admission. Initial screening identified 204 records, which were narrowed to 17 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis following multi-author relevance review. Six reviewers independently extracted data and resolved discrepancies through consensus. Study quality was appraised by two reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and data were analyzed using the RevMan Web software with random-effects models. Results: Pharmacological, nutritional, and physical activity interventions in women with gestational diabetes mellitus demonstrated statistically significant reductions in gestational weight gain and cesarean delivery rates. No statistically significant effects were observed for HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial glucose, lipid profiles, or blood pressure. Several outcomes, including preeclampsia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal complications, and NICU admission, showed non-significant trends toward benefit, but these findings were based on limited data and should be interpreted cautiously. No meaningful effects were observed for gestational age at delivery, neonatal birth weight, preterm birth, Apgar score, or macrosomia. Substantial heterogeneity was present across metabolic outcomes, limiting the interpretability of pooled estimates. Conclusions: Nutritional and physical activity interventions significantly reduce HbA1c, gestational weight gain, and cesarean delivery in women with GDM, with protective trends for preeclampsia and neonatal complications. However, effects on lipid profiles and blood pressure remain inconsistent. Personalized, multimodal strategies integrating pharmacological, nutritional, and lifestyle modifications are necessary for optimal GDM management.