The use of echocardiography for the evaluation of the cardiovascular well-being of term and preterm infants is gaining significant interest. The aim of echocardiography in this setting is to provide hemodynamic information in real time in order to support bedside clinical decision making (1,2,3). This approach is perceived to enhance clinical judgment, provide a better understanding of active physiological processes, and monitor the response to treatment. Combination of clinical examination and bedside echocardiography has been shown to facilitate clinical decision making (4). There is some evidence that routine use of echocardiography on the neonatal unit might lead to early identification of cardiovascular compromise that could facilitate clinical management (5), potentially improving short-term outcomes (6,7). There is growing literature highlighting the potential merits of echocardiography in the identification of cardiovascular compromise and guiding neonatal cardiovascular care (4,6,8,9). There is a need to ensure standardization of training and clinical practice guidelines, with quality assurance systems in place to maintain safe dissemination of this practice. There are currently two published guidelines in neonatal echocardiography with recommendations for training and an accredited structured training program with accreditation in neonatal cardiac ultrasound. The practice guidelines and recommendations for the use of echocardiography (Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography (TNE)) and Expert consensus statement on Neonatologist performed echocardiography (NoPE) in the United Kingdom were published in the last 5 y (10,11). However, some aspects of these two guidelines are difficult to implement in a pan European setting. The Australian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine has developed and implemented a basic training and accreditation process in Australia encompassing cardiac, brain, and abdominal ultrasound that is difficult to adopt in Europe (http://www.asum.com.au). As a result, a working group under the auspices of the European Society for Paediatric Research and the European Society for Neonatology was convened to devise a consensus statement for neonatologist performed echocardiography training taking into account the heterogeneous nature of training facilities, personnel, and infrastructure across Europe. In this statement, we aim to (i) highlight the difficulties in implementing the current TNE and UK guidelines in a European setting; (ii) define the training facilities and infrastructure necessary for optimal training conditions; (iii) identify training standards applicable across Europe; and (iv) discuss some practical aspects including a suggested governance structure for oversight of training and continued quality assurance. We have elected to use the term neonatologist performed echocardiography (NPE) as used in the UK guideline because it identifies the person performing the assessment and the target organ assessed. This consensus statement deals with NPE for assessment of hemodynamic function in infants with a structurally normal heart (patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and patent foramen ovale included). Although confirmation of normal structural anatomy is within the remit of this practice, diagnosis and management of congenital heart disease (CHD) is beyond the scope of this guideline. This practice should always remain under the remit of pediatric cardiology services. Preterm and term infants with clinical or echocardiographic suspicion of CHD should be immediately referred to a pediatric cardiologist. Neonatology services in Europe are very heterogeneous in nature and include Level 1 and 2 units, stand-alone Level 3 maternity units, those colocated with adult services, and quaternary maternity units located either physically with, or in the vicinity of, a children’s hospital. More importantly, the proximity between pediatric cardiology services and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are very variable across Europe. In general, pediatric cardiology services in Europe are under pressure and might not be adequately resourced to take in an additional influx of echocardiography trainees outside a dedicated cardiology fellowship program. As a result, a “one size fits all” approach for NPE training and accreditation in Europe may not be feasible. The American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography/Association for European Paediatric Cardiology guideline for TNE training is an ideal example of a structured approach to standardize training and maintenance of competence (11,12). Our consensus group fully endorses large sections of those guidelines including the background and indications, practical aspects, the suggested approach to the various clinical indications (Sections 1 and 2), and we suggest the reader to refer to the sections for a comprehensive overview of those topics. However, certain aspects of the proposals for training are currently not achievable in a European context. The guideline proposes a two-phase process of a core training period followed by an advanced period of training, both lasting 4–6 mo. During the core period, the candidates should carry out >150 scans and review a further 150 scans, 80% of which should be structurally abnormal. This training is mandated to be carried out in an echocardiography laboratory under the direction of the pediatric cardiology service. Following an unspecified assessment process, the candidate moves on to the advanced stage for another period of 4–6 mo and an additional 150 scans and 150 study reviews. The suggested place of training is the NICU for the advanced phase. However, direct or indirect supervision and coordination by the pediatric cardiology service are mandated during this phase of training as well. This approach to training has faced difficulties in lead North American centers and is not feasible in Europe where pediatric cardiology services...