Objective : This study analyzed the risk factors in patients who developed distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) after posterior cervical fusion.Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 64 patients, aged ≥18 years (51 and 13 male and female patients, respectively), who underwent single-staged multilevel (3–6 levels) posterior cervical fusion surgery due to multiple cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The surgeries were performed by a single spinal surgeon between January 2012 and December 2017. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and radiological results were collected. We divided the patients into a DJK group and a non-DJK group according to the presence of DJK and investigated the risk factors by comparing the differences between the two groups.Results : Of the 64 patients, 13 developed DJK. No significant differences in clinical results were observed between the two groups before and immediately after the surgery. At the final follow-up, a higher visual analog score for neck pain was observed in the DJK group compared to the non-DJK group (p<0.01). The DJK group had a significantly lower T1 slope and a significantly higher C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) before surgery compared to the non-DJK group (p=0.03 and p<0.01, respectively). Immediately after surgery, the difference between the two groups decreased and no significant difference was observed. However, at the last followup, a significantly higher C2-7 SVA was observed in the DJK group (p<0.01). At the last follow up, there is no discrepancy in T1S-CL. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative higher C2-7 SVA and preoperative lower T1 slope were identified as independent risk factors (p=0.03 and p<0.01, respectively). As a result, it was confirmed that DJK occurred along the process of returning to preoperative values.Conclusion : DJK can be considered to be caused by cervical misalignment due to excessive change in the surgical site in patients with low T1 slope and high C2-7 SVA before surgery. This also affects the clinical outcome after surgery. It is recommended to refrain from excessive segmental lordosis changes during multilevel cervical post fusion surgery, especially in patients with a small preoperative T1 slope and a large SVA value.

Background/Objectives: The debate continues, despite numerous studies, on whether vertebroplasty (VP) or conservative treatment is more suitable for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Meanwhile, teriparatide (TP) has shown promise in accelerating bone healing in OVCFs. This analysis aims to clarify the potential benefits of conservative treatment using TP over VP from several clinical studies on acute OVCFs. Methods: A literature search was performed, using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Review, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, for studies published up until September 2023. Five studies [one randomized controlled study (RCT) and four non-RCTs] were included in a qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model to obtain the effect size. Results: Five studies with a total of 326 (TP = 147, VP = 179) patients were included. Within the first week of treatment, the VP group showed a significantly greater decrease in their visual analog scale (VAS) scores. There was no significant difference in VAS score reduction between the two groups from one to three months. However, after 6 months, the TP group exhibited significant superiority in VAS scores and bone mineral density (BMD). Furthermore, TP was associated with a reduced number of new-onset OVCFs, with a statistically significant estimated odds ratio of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.04–0.51, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Conservative treatment using TP for acute OVCF has been found to reduce subsequent fractures, provide equivalent or superior pain control, and increase BMD compared to VP. Nonetheless, the meta-analysis results are weak, due to the low level of evidence.

Objective : This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with metastatic spinal tumors who underwent either short-segment fixation with anterior support or long-segment fixation with a separation surgery in the thoracic or lumbar spine.Methods : We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who were treated surgically for spinal metastases in the thoracic or lumbar spine at a single tertiary referral center between April 2014 and December 2022. Surgical treatments included spinal cord decompression, short-segment fixation with maximal circumferential debulking of the lytic tumor portion and anterior support, or longsegment fixation without anterior support, followed by separation surgery and posterolateral fusion. We compared the two fixation strategies based on patient demographics, preoperative diagnoses, surgical data, neurological assessments, and changes in segmental Cobb angles immediately after surgery, and at the final follow-up.Results : A total of 91 patients were included (short-segment, 44; long-segment, 47). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding age, sex, comorbidities, primary cancer location, postoperative complications, or reoperation rates. Furthermore, no significant differences in the sagittal Cobb angles, including global angle (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis) and segmental angle were noted from the preop to the final follow-up. Compared to traditional long-segment fixation, short-segment fixation with anterior support significantly improved neurological outcomes in the thoracic region and reduced the length of hospital stay. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding complications or other clinical outcomes.Conclusion : Short-segment fixation is comparable to long-segment fixation in the management of thoracolumbar metastatic spinal tumors, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes. However, short-segment fixation provides the added advantages of improved neurological outcomes in the thoracic region and shorter hospital stays.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a potentially catastrophic disease. Laminoplasty (LP) is a common surgical intervention, but postoperative kyphosis progression is a major complication, for which various risk factors have been identified and used in surgical decision-making. Our focus is on the ability of OPLL with specific morphological traits, designated as the true continuous segment (TCS), to stabilize alignment and prevent postoperative kyphosis after LP. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent cervical LP for OPLL treatment with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Demographic, operative, and radiographic parameters were analyzed. TCS is defined as a continuous segment of OPLL that spans the disk space more than half of the adjacent vertebral body height without crack, or OPLL segment attached to both upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies by bridging, or obvious interbody autofusion, and is identified from preoperative computed tomography. A subgroup analysis for preoperatively lordotic patients, divided into 2 groups based on cervical alignment at the final follow-up, was conducted to identify risk factors for kyphosis progression. Difference analysis, linear regression analysis for loss of lordosis (LoL), and logistic regression analysis for kyphosis progression were used. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were identified. Among them, 78 patients with preoperatively lordotic alignment were divided into 2 groups: those who maintained lordotic alignment (n = 60) and those who progressed to kyphosis (n = 18). Regression analyses revealed a significant protective effect of TCS count against LoL and postoperative kyphosis, with a TCS count of 3 or more conclusively preventing kyphosis (sensitivity 1.000, specificity 0.283, area under the curve 0.629). CONCLUSION: For patients with OPLL, TCS was shown to protect against the LoL after LP. Therefore, TCS should be identified and considered when planning surgical treatment for OPLL.

The integrity of the high cervical spine, the transition zone from the brainstem to the spinal cord, is crucial for survival and daily life. The region protects the enclosed neurovascular structure and allows a substantial portion of the head motion. Injuries of the high cervical spine are frequent, and the fractures of the C2 vertebra account for approximately 17–25% of acute cervical fractures. We review the two major types of C2 vertebral fractures, odontoid fracture and Hangman’s fracture. For both types of fractures, favorable outcomes could be obtained if the delicately selected conservative treatment is performed. In odontoid fractures, as the most common fracture on the C2 vertebrae, anterior screw fixation is considered first for type II fractures, and C1–2 fusion is suggested when nonunion is a concern or occurs. Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture. Many stable extension type I and II fractures can be treated with external immobilization, whereas the predominant flexion type IIA and III fractures require surgical stabilization. No result proves that either anterior or posterior surgery is superior, and the surgeon should decide on the surgical method after careful consideration according to each clinical situation. This review will briefly describe the basic principles and current treatment concepts of C2 fractures.

This case report addresses pharyngeal perforation, an uncommon complication after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). A 78-year-old male, who initially presented with quadriparesis, underwent ACDF. Post-surgery, the porridge he consumed was observed in the drain tube, leading to complications such as respiratory distress and fever. An emergency exploratory surgery was performed, and a suspected pharyngeal perforation was identified and treated with primary repair and sternocleidomastoid flap. Through thorough post-operative observation, we identified critical signs requiring immediate intervention, allowing for a successful recovery without additional complications. This report emphasizes the importance of early detection and intervention for complications following ACDF, providing valuable insights for clinical practice in neurosurgical intensive care.