Kaleab Abebe

Dr. Kaleab Abebe


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 February 2008 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDavid Brent
David Brent
GEGraham Emslie
Graham Emslie
GCGreg Clarke
Greg Clarke
KWKaren Dineen Wagner
Karen Dineen Wagner
JAJoan Rosenbaum Asarnow
Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow
JZJamie Zelazny
Jamie Zelazny
Adolescent depression is a common, chronic, recurrent, and impairing condition that accounts for a substantial proportion of the disability and mortality incurred in this age group.1,2 Untreated depression results in impairment in school, interpersonal relationships, occupational adjustment, and increases the risk for suicidal behavior and completed suicide.3-5 Therefore, the proper treatment of adolescent depression has profound public health implications for youth in this critical stage of development.6-8

11 December 2014 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRobert Schrier
Robert Schrier
KAKaleab Abebe
Kaleab Abebe
RPRonald D. Perrone
Ronald D. Perrone
VTVicente E. Torres
Vicente E. Torres
WBWilliam E. Braun
William E. Braun
ACArlene B. Chapman
Arlene B. Chapman
Hypertension is common in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and is associated with increased total kidney volume, activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and progression of kidney disease. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 558 hypertensive participants with ADPKD (15 to 49 years of age, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] >60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area) to either a standard blood-pressure target (120/70 to 130/80 mm Hg) or a low blood-pressure target (95/60 to 110/75 mm Hg) and to either an angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril) plus an angiotensin-receptor blocker (telmisartan) or lisinopril plus placebo. The primary outcome was the annual percentage change in the total kidney volume. The annual percentage increase in total kidney volume was significantly lower in the low-blood-pressure group than in the standard-blood-pressure group (5.6% vs. 6.6%, P=0.006), without significant differences between the lisinopril–telmisartan group and the lisinopril–placebo group. The rate of change in estimated GFR was similar in the two medication groups, with a negative slope difference in the short term in the low-blood-pressure group as compared with the standard-blood-pressure group (P<0.001) and a marginally positive slope difference in the long term (P=0.05). The left-ventricular-mass index decreased more in the low-blood-pressure group than in the standard-blood-pressure group (−1.17 vs. −0.57 g per square meter per year, P<0.001); urinary albumin excretion was reduced by 3.77% with the low-pressure target and increased by 2.43% with the standard target (P<0.001). Dizziness and light-headedness were more common in the low-blood-pressure group than in the standard-blood-pressure group (80.7% vs. 69.4%, P=0.002). In early ADPKD, the combination of lisinopril and telmisartan did not significantly alter the rate of increase in total kidney volume. As compared with standard blood-pressure control, rigorous blood-pressure control was associated with a slower increase in total kidney volume, no overall change in the estimated GFR, a greater decline in the left-ventricular-mass index, and greater reduction in urinary albumin excretion. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; HALT-PKD [Study A] ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00283686.)

11 December 2014 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VTVicente E. Torres
Vicente E. Torres
KAKaleab Abebe
Kaleab Abebe
ACArlene B. Chapman
Arlene B. Chapman
RSRobert W. Schrier
Robert W. Schrier
WBWilliam E. Braun
William E. Braun
RPRonald D. Perrone
Ronald D. Perrone
Hypertension develops early in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and is associated with disease progression. The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension in patients with ADPKD. Dual blockade of the RAAS may circumvent compensatory mechanisms that limit the efficacy of monotherapy with an angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II–receptor blocker (ARB). In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 486 patients, 18 to 64 years of age, with ADPKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR], 25 to 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area) to receive an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) and placebo or lisinopril and an ARB (telmisartan), with the doses adjusted to achieve a blood pressure of 110/70 to 130/80 mm Hg. The composite primary outcome was the time to death, end-stage renal disease, or a 50% reduction from the baseline estimated GFR. Secondary outcomes included the rates of change in urinary aldosterone and albumin excretion, frequency of hospitalizations for any cause and for cardiovascular causes, incidence of pain, frequency of ADPKD-related symptoms, quality of life, and adverse study-medication effects. Patients were followed for 5 to 8 years. There was no significant difference between the study groups in the incidence of the composite primary outcome (hazard ratio with lisinopril–telmisartan, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.42). The two treatments controlled blood pressure and lowered urinary aldosterone excretion similarly. The rates of decline in the estimated GFR, urinary albumin excretion, and other secondary outcomes and adverse events, including hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury, were also similar in the two groups. Monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor was associated with blood-pressure control in most patients with ADPKD and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The addition of an ARB did not alter the decline in the estimated GFR. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; HALT-PKD [Study B] ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01885559.)

1 March 2011 in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VTVicente E. Torres
Vicente E. Torres
JGJared J. Grantham
Jared J. Grantham
ACArlene B. Chapman
Arlene B. Chapman
MMMichal Mrug
Michal Mrug
KBKyongtae T. Bae
Kyongtae T. Bae
F(for the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP)
for the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP)
Summary: Background and objectives: The Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP) was created to identify markers of disease progression in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Linear mixed models were utilized to model effects of baseline parameters on changes in natural-log (ln)-transformed total kidney volume (TKV) and iothalamate clearance (GFR) across time in CRISP participants (creatinine clearance at entry >70 ml/min). Stepwise selection was used to obtain a final main effect model. Results: TKV increased from year to year, whereas GFR uncorrected for body surface area (BSA) decreased only at year 6. Higher lnTKV and urine sodium excretion (UNaV), lower serum HDL-cholesterol, and younger age at baseline associated with greater lnTKV growth from baseline to year 3 and to year 6. Higher lnTKV at baseline associated with greater GFR decline from year 1 to year 3 and to year 6. Higher BSA and 24-hour urine osmolality at baseline associated with greater GFR decline from year 1 to year 6. Higher UNaV and lower serum HDL-cholesterol at baseline associated with greater GFR decline from year 1 to year 6 by univariate analysis only. Associations seen during year 1 to year 6 (not seen during year 1 to year 3) reflect the time lag between structural and functional disease progression. Conclusions: Serum HDL-cholesterol, UNaV, and 24-hour urine osmolality likely affect ADPKD progression. To what extent their modification may influence the clinical course of ADPKD remains to be determined.

1 January 2015 in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMarie C. Hogan
Marie C. Hogan
KAKaleab Abebe
Kaleab Abebe
VTVicente E. Torres
Vicente E. Torres
ACArlene B. Chapman
Arlene B. Chapman
KBKyongtae T. Bae
Kyongtae T. Bae
RSRobert W. Schrier
Robert W. Schrier

1 February 2014 in American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDana C. Miskulin
Dana C. Miskulin
KAKaleab Abebe
Kaleab Abebe
ACArlene B. Chapman
Arlene B. Chapman
RPRonald D. Perrone
Ronald D. Perrone
TSTheodore I. Steinman
Theodore I. Steinman
RSRobert W. Schrier
Robert W. Schrier