Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a global pandemic and a disruptive health crisis. COVID-19–related morbidity and mortality have been attributed to an exaggerated immune response. The role of complement activation and its contribution to illness severity is being increasingly recognized. Here, we summarize current knowledge about the interaction of coronaviruses with the complement system. We posit that (a) coronaviruses activate multiple complement pathways; (b) severe COVID-19 clinical features often resemble complementopathies; (c) the combined effects of complement activation, dysregulated neutrophilia, endothelial injury, and hypercoagulability appear to be intertwined to drive the severe features of COVID-19; (d) a subset of patients with COVID-19 may have a genetic predisposition associated with complement dysregulation; and (e) these observations create a basis for clinical trials of complement inhibitors in life-threatening illness.

The complement system is a tightly regulated, cascading protein network representing a key component linking the innate and humoral immune systems. However, if misdirected or dysregulated, it can be similarly damaging to host-tissue. The role of complement dysregulation on vascular endothelial cells has been well established in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and target organ injury. Yet, a great deal of complexity exists around the role of complement in TMA associated with other diseases. A further complicating factor is the cross-talk between complement, neutrophils, and coagulation pathways in the pathophysiology of TMA. Advancements in the understanding of the etiopathogenesis of aHUS paved the way for the successful development of anticomplement therapies (complement C5 inhibitors), which have revolutionized the treatment of aHUS. Therefore, a clearer understanding of the role of the complement system in TMA associated with other conditions will help to identify patients who would benefit from these therapies. This review aims to provide an assessment of the nature and extent of complement involvement in TMA associated with autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, and scleroderma renal crisis. Defining the role of complement in TMA in these conditions will help to guide timely diagnosis and management.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) represents a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by microvascular thrombosis and end-organ damage. Pregnancy-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (p-TMA) has emerged as a distinct clinical entity with unique diagnostic challenges. Identifying the specific form of p-TMA is critical for appropriate and timely management. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the various forms of thrombotic microangiopathies associated with pregnancy, highlighting our current understanding of their pathophysiology and the evolving landscape of diagnosis and treatment for each.

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy typically characterized by anemia, thrombocytopenia, and end-organ injury. aHUS occurs due to endothelial injury resulting from overactivation of the alternative pathway of the complement system. The etiology of the dysregulated complement system is either a genetic mutation in 1 or more complement proteins or an acquired deficiency due to autoantibodies. Over the past decade, advancements in our understanding of the role of complement in the pathophysiology of aHUS as well as the availability of anticomplement drugs has been a game-changer for our patients. These drugs have revolutionized the clinical course, outcome, and prognosis of this disease. Therefore, all patients in whom aHUS is suspected should undergo testing for complement genetic variants and autoantibodies. In approximately 30% to 40% of patients, a genetic variant of uncertain significance (VUS) may be identified. Such patients should undergo further testing to define the significance of the VUS. A combination of antigenic, functional, and biomarker analyses can assist in establishing the significance of the variants and thereby define the etiology in most patients. These analyses will also help to determine the duration of treatment based on the individual's genetic alteration. This review aims to shed light on the diagnosis and management of aHUS and discusses how to stratify patients to determine who can safely discontinue anticomplement therapy.

The increasing availability of clinically approved genetic tests for kidney disease has spurred the growth in the use of these tests in kidney transplant practice. Neither the testing options nor the patient population where this should be deployed has been defined, and its value in kidney transplant evaluation has not been demonstrated. Transplant providers may not always be aware of the limitations of genetic testing and may need guidance on comprehending test results and providing counsel, as many centers do not have easy access to a renal genetic counselor or a clinical geneticist. In this practice resource, a working group of nephrologists, geneticists, and a genetic counselor provide a pragmatic, tailored approach to genetic testing, advocating for its use only where the genetic diagnosis or its exclusion can impact the choices available for transplantation or posttransplant management or the workup of living donor candidates at increased risk for heritable disease.