There is currently a debate on whether all Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures should be revised. The aim of our work was to establish a decision-making algorithm that helps to decide whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty (RA) should be performed in these patients. Relative indications in favour of ORIF are low-medium functional demand (Parker mobility score (PMS) <5), high anaesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) ≥ 3), many comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 5), 1 zone fractured (VB2.1), anatomical reconstruction possible, and no prior loosening (hip pain). Relative indications in favour of RA are high functional demand (PMS ≥6), low anaesthetic risk (ASA< 3), few comorbidities (CCI<5), fracture ≥ 2 zones (VB2.2), comminuted fractures, and prior loosening (hip pain). In cemented stems, those fractures with fully intact cement–bone interface, no stem subsidence into the cementraliser, cement mantle anatomically reducible, and some partial stem-cement attachment can be safely treated with ORIF.

Hip fracture is the most feared complication of osteoporosis, producing up to 30% mortality at the first year. With the aging of society, it is increasingly common to deal with ethical dilemmas that involve decision making in the elderly patient with a hip fracture. The objectives of the present work are to describe the main bioethical dilemmas in this group of patients and their relationship with surgical delay. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study that studied an elderly population admitted to a University Hospital with a diagnosis of hip fracture. In total, 415 patients were analyzed. The majority received surgical treatment, a correct application of the principles of justice, non-maleficence and beneficence is verified, but a possible violation of the principle of autonomy is confirmed. Based on the results of this study, the elderly population may somehow lose their principle of autonomy when they enter a hospital due to a hip fracture. On the other hand, the so-called ageism due to ignorance can influence the surgical delay and therefore the mortality of these patients.

The incidence of peripheral neurological injuries related to calcaneal osteotomies reported in the literature is low and often described as occasional. The main objective of this study is to determine the incidence of neurological injuries after calcaneal osteotomies and identify which nerve structures are most affected. This retrospective work included 69 patients. Medical records, surgical protocols, and radiographs were analyzed. All patients were summoned to perform current functional tests (EFAS score and SF-12), and a thorough physical examination was performed systematically and bilaterally. The total incidence of neurological injuries was 43.5% (30/69). The percentage of neurapraxias (transient injuries) was 8.7%, while 34.8% of patients presented neurological sequelae (permanent injuries). The most injured nerve or branch was, in decreasing order: sural nerve, medial plantar branch, lateral plantar branch and medial calcaneal branch. Following the so-called “safe zone” clearly decreases the incidence of sural nerve injury (p = 0.035). No significant differences were found between osteotomy site, number of screws, and type of closure and increased neurological injuries. No significant differences were found in the functional tests between the different techniques, nor between patients who presented neurological injuries and those who did not. Neurological injuries after calcaneal osteotomies are underdiagnosed and the incidence is higher than previously reported (43.5%). Such injuries mostly go unnoticed and have no implications in the functional results and patients’ satisfaction.