Palliative care has been shown to help patients live well with serious illness, but the specific psychological factors that contribute to this benefit remain investigational. Although support of patient coping has emerged as a likely factor, it is unclear how palliative care helps patients to cope with serious illness. The therapeutic relationship has been proposed as a key element in beneficial patient outcomes, possibly undergirding effective patient and family coping. Understanding the distress of our patients with psychological depth requires the input of varied clinicians and thinkers. The complex conceptual model we developed draws upon the contributions of medicine, nursing, psychology, spiritual care, and social work disciplines. To elucidate these issues, we convened an interdisciplinary seminar of content experts to explore the psychological components of palliative care practice. “Healing Beyond the Cure: Exploring the Psychodynamic Aspects of Palliative Care” was held in May 2019 at Harvard University's Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. Over two days, the working group explored these essential elements of successful palliative care encounters through lecture and open discussion. This special report describes the key psychological aspects of palliative care that we believe underlie optimal adaptive coping in palliative care patients. We also outline key areas for further development in palliative care research, education, and clinical practice. The discussion held at this meeting became the basis for a planned series of articles on the psychological elements of palliative care that will be published in the Journal of Palliative Medicine on a monthly basis during the fall and winter of 2021–2022.

Background: Communication about prognosis is a key ingredient of effective palliative care. When patients with advanced cancer develop increased prognostic understanding, there is potential for existential distress to occur. However, the existential dimensions of prognosis communication are underexplored. Objective: To describe the existential dimensions of prognosis communication in naturally-occurring palliative care conversations. Methods: This study was an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. We analyzed a random subset of patients from the Palliative Care Communication Research Initiative (PCCRI) parent study ( n = 34, contributing to 45 palliative care conversations). Data were based on audio-recorded and transcribed inpatient palliative care conversations between adults with advanced cancer, their families, and palliative care clinicians. We stratified the study sample by levels of prognosis communication, and qualitatively examined patterns of existential communication, comparing the intensity, frequency, and content, within and across levels. Results: Existential communication was more common, and of stronger intensity, within conversations with higher levels of prognosis communication. Conversations with more prognosis communication appeared to exhibit a shift toward the existential and away from the more physical nature of the serious illness experience. Conclusion: Existential and prognosis communication are intimately linked within palliative care conversations. Results highlight the multiplicity and mutuality of concerns that arise when contemplating mortality, drawing attention to areas of palliative care communication that warrant future research.

Identifying and attending to the existential needs of persons with serious illness and their care partners are integral to whole-person palliative care (PC). Yet, many PC clinicians, due to individual factors and wider systemic barriers, are ill-prepared and under-resourced to navigate the existential dimension. In this article, written from clinical, research, and lived experiences, we offer tips to empower PC clinicians to understand, recognize, and respond to patients' and care partners' existential experiences by leveraging their existing skills, collaborating closely with colleagues, exploring their own existential experience, and implementing evidence-based interventions. We propose that by prioritizing existential care within PC, we can shift the culture of health care to better affirm the humanity of both patients and clinicians.