Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive valvular heart disease marked by a restriction of blood flow through the aortic valve, resulting in considerable morbidity and mortality if not addressed. AS has historically been managed through surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), but there is a growing trend towards the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). TAVR has transformed the management of symptomatic severe AS and is currently authorized for patients with varying levels of surgical risk. The rising application of TAVR in patients under 65 years presents a challenge for heart valve teams (HVTs) managing younger individuals whose life expectancy may surpass the durability of the valve. Patients over 65 years are typically treated with bioprosthetic tissue valves; however, there remains significant uncertainty regarding the selection between TAVR and SAVR.

This narrative review critically summarizes the literature on the associations of Type A and Type D personality, together with related personality traits, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) onset, prognosis, cardiac surgery, and rehabilitation outcomes. For the past half a century, there has been a consistent interest in the question of whether or not there is a connection between personality qualities and CVD. At the same time as individuals with a Type A personality who were angry, competitive, and excessively motivated were overrepresented among patients seeking treatment for CVD, it was also noted that these individuals were more likely to acquire coronary artery disease or syndrome. Anger and animosity were among the unfavorable impacts that were found to be connected with worse cardiovascular outcomes, according to the findings of research. After that, a new personality entity was brought into existence, which was referred to as the type D “distressed” personality. This personality type coupled negative affectivity and social inhibition. Type D personality subsequently became a major focus of research, and several studies reported associations with poorer patient-reported health and adverse cardiac outcomes. However, these findings have not been consistently replicated, and the stability, incremental predictive value, and independence of Type D personality from depression, disease severity, and other psychosocial factors remain debated. As a result, there are a number of criticisms that pertain to the current knowledge of the connection between personality construct and the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases as well as the outcome of these diseases. This review provides a critical narrative synthesis of supportive and conflicting evidence and highlights the methodological limitations that currently prevent definitive causal or prognostic conclusions.

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) comprises acute aortic dissection, intramural haematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and limited intimal tear, conditions that require rapid recognition because mortality and resource use are strongly influenced by time to diagnosis, anatomical extent, malperfusion, and the need for emergency surgical or endovascular intervention. This revised narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on clinical, genetic, environmental, and health-system determinants of prolonged hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) utilisation, bed occupancy, and costs in patients with AAS. Beyond summarising established risk factors, the review adds a resource-oriented framework that links hypertension, advanced age, female sex, smoking-related comorbidity, hereditary aortopathies, haemodynamic instability, malperfusion, delayed diagnosis, operative complexity, and postoperative complications to measurable downstream outcomes such as ICU length of stay, total hospital length of stay, reoperation, readmission, and longitudinal imaging surveillance. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant studies, registries, guideline documents, and cost analyses published between January 2000 and May 2026, with particular emphasis on studies from the last five years. The review was not designed as a meta-analysis; therefore, effect estimates are interpreted according to study design and generalisability. AAS imposes a disproportionate burden on hospital systems because high-risk patients often require advanced imaging, prolonged haemodynamic monitoring, complex open or endovascular repair, ICU care, and lifelong follow-up. Earlier diagnosis, structured risk stratification, targeted genetic evaluation, aggressive control of modifiable risk factors, and system-level pathways such as dedicated aortic networks may shorten hospital stay and reduce avoidable costs.