In 2024, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, faced the most severe flood event in its recorded history, which compromised several ground-based hydrological gauges. The SWOT (Surface Water and Ocean Topography) satellite, capable of measuring water surface elevation (WSE) in continental waters, is a valuable tool for providing critical data. This study investigates whether node-level WSE data from the SWOT satellite can effectively function as virtual hydrological stations under such extreme conditions. The study was applied in all of RS state considering 100 in situ gauges and was subdivided into three sections: (i) an evaluation of the variation in SWOTʹs WSE data compared to the variation in in situ levels from telemetric gauges, considering subsequent cycles of passes between July 2023 and April 2025, yielding an MAE = 35 cm and an RMSE = 73 cm after outlier removal; (ii) an evaluation of the variation in SWOTʹs WSE data compared to the variation in telemetric level data, considering one window prior to and another during the extreme event, resulting an MAE = 26 cm and an RMSE = 34 cm; (iii) an analysis of SWOTʹs data availability during the extreme event, when in situ telemetric data were unavailable. The results demonstrate an agreement between the variation observed in SWOT data and that in telemetric gauges in RS, even during extreme events. Moreover, in the absence of in situ data, SWOT was still able to capture WSE data.

High-quality water surface elevation (WSE) measurements are critical in hydrological applications, yet no systematic evaluation of the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission exists for Brazil’s diverse lake systems, where satellite observations are essential given limited in situ monitoring. We evaluated WSE from SWOT over 132 Brazilian lakes, comparing LakeSP, Raster_250m, and Raster_100m products against field measurements over a 20-month period. The 68th percentile errors were under 29 cm for the full dataset, below 12 cm for Flag = 0, and below 21 cm for Flag = 1, indicating good agreement but also the presence of outliers and the need for data screening. A Random Forest analysis identified quality flags, lake geometry, and cross-track distance as key drivers of WSE precision. Flag = 0 is overly restrictive, retaining only 22% of observations, while Flag = 1 contains anomalous data. The SWOT Quality-Range Threshold for Lakes (SQRTL) filter combines Flag = 0 with cross-track constrained Flag = 1 observations. SQRTL more than triples data availability relative to Flag = 0, maintaining comparable precision (68th percentile below 16 cm) and reducing median revisit from 88–123 days to 16–18 days for raster products and from 25 to 14 days for LakeSP. These results provide the first large-scale SWOT WSE evaluation over Brazilian lakes and a transferable filtering framework applicable wherever SWOT and field observations overlap, with potential to extend monitoring to over 100,000 water bodies in the SWOT Prior Lake Database.